Comparison of Biometric Values and Intraocular Lens Power Calculations Obtained by Ultrasound and Optical Biometry
Published Online: Dec 13, 2016
Page range: 321 - 326
Received: Feb 09, 2015
Accepted: Feb 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjecr-2016-0034
Keywords
© 2016
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
This study sought to compare the biometric values and intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained by standard ultrasound and optical biometry.
We examined 29 eyes in preparation for cataract surgery. None of the patients had refractive surgery or corneal anomaly. In all patients, the horizontal and vertical refractive power of the cornea was determined using a keratometer (Bausch&Lomb). The axial length of the eye was determined via A-scan ultrasound (BVI-compact-V-plus) using Hollady’s formula. The IOL power and complete biometric measurements were obtained via an IOL Master-500-Zeiss using the Hollady-2 formula. All obtained values were compared and analysed using the statistical program SPSS 20.
The average age of treated patients was 71.21±1.68 years. In 16 patients with dense cataracts (55.17%), it was not possible to determine the IOL power by optical biometry. Optical biometry obtained significantly increased axial length values of 24.04±0.29 mm compared with those obtained with ultrasound biometry (23.89±0.28 mm, p=0.003). The mean refractive cornea power values of the horizontal meridian measured using a keratometer (42.50±0.47 D) and an IOL Master (42.69±0.49 D) were not statistically different (p=0.187). The mean values of the refractive cornea power of the vertical meridian obtained using a keratometer (42.62±0.48D) and an IOL Master (43.36±0.51 D) exhibited a statistically significant difference (p=0.000). The keratometer obtained statistically significant lower mean values of corneal refractive power (42.73±0.32 D) compared with those obtained with optical biometry (43.22±0.35 D, p=0.000). Ultrasound biometry obtained significantly increased the mean values of IOL power (20.19±0.48D) compared with those obtained with optical biometry (19.71±0.48 D, p=0.018).
The large number of patients who receive an operation for dense cataracts indicate the need for representation of both biometric methods in our clinical practice.