Reinvention of the Public Sector: Total Quality Management and Change Management

Open access


The present article provides a review of Total Quality Management (TQM) and Change Management in Public Sector. It highlights the special role of TQM in the Public Sector, the concept of Quality in Public Sector Services, the Innovation in Public Sector and the role that E-Government can play. Moreover, it emphasizes some Best Practices that have been applied in Greece and consists of innovative and interesting practices. It concludes by integrating all concepts discussed with the factors that shape change.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bessant J. R. (2003). High-involvement innovation: Building and sustaining competitive advantage through continuous change. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.

  • Bovaird T. & Löffler E. (2002). Moving from excel-lence models of local service Delivery to bench-marking of good local governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences 68(1) 9-24. DOI:10.1177/0020852302681001.

  • Bovaird T. Löffler E. & Parrado-Dí ez S. (2002). De-veloping local governance networks in Europe. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Bowen D. E. (1986). Managing customers as human re-sources in service organizations. Human Resource Management 25 371-383. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.3930250304.

  • Bradley C. (2000). Managing change. Training and De-velopment in Australia 27(1) 10-14.

  • Burtonshaw-Gunn S. A. (2008). The essential management toolbox: Tools models and notes for managers and consultants. Chichester England: Wiley & Sons.

  • Cameron E. & Green M. (2004). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models tools & techniques of organizational change. London: Kogan Page.

  • Chen H.-K. Chen H.-Y. Wu H.-H. & Lin W.-T. (2004). Implementation in a healthcare and phar-maceutical logistics organization: The case of Zuellig Pharma in Taiwan. Journal of Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 15(9-10) 1171-1178. DOI: 10.1080/1478336042000255550.

  • Choi M. & Ruona W. E. A. (2011). Individual readi-ness for organizational change and its implications for human resource and organization development. Human Resource Development Review 10(1) 46-73. DOI: 10.1177/1534484310384957.

  • Daemen H. & Schaap L. (2000). Citizen and city: Devel-opments infifteen local democracies in Europe. Delft: Eburon.

  • Denhardt R. B. & Denhardt J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Adminis-tration Review 60(6) 549-559. DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00117.

  • Dervitsiotis K. N. (2005). Δıoiκηση Oλıκńζ Πoıóτηταζ. Athens: Law Library. (in Greek).

  • de Waal A. A. (2003). Behavioral factors important for the successful implementation and use of performance management systems. Management Decision 41(8) 688-697. DOI: 10.1108/00251740310496206.

  • de Waal A. A. (2004). Stimulating performance - driven behavior to obtain better results. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 53(4) 301-316. DOI: 10.1108/17410400410533890.

  • Dover P. (2003). Change agents at work: Lessons from Siemens Nixdorf. Journal of Change Management 3(3) 243-257. DOI: 10.1080/714042535.

  • Drucker P. (2012). Managing in a Time of Great Change. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

  • Engel C (2003). Quality management tools in CEE can-didate countries: Current practice needs and expectations. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Ad-ministration.

  • Ford J. D. Ford L. W. & D'Amelio A. (2008). Resist-ance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review 33(2) 362-377. DOI:10.5465/ AMR.2008.31193235

  • Ford J. D. Ford L. W. & McNamara R. T. (2002). Resist-ance and the background conversations of charge. Journal of Organizational Change Management 15(2) 105-121. DOI: 10.1108/09534810210422991.

  • Fuegen K. & Brehm J. W. (2004). The intensity of affect and resistance to social influence. In Knowles E. S. & Linn J. A. Resistance and persuasion. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Giannakopoulou S. (2011).- H ∊φαapuoórσ s καctAdary Aı-íκησηc-λıκńc Πıóφηφαc cr Aηuai ai-ıωφıκó φuα:- π∊ρíπφωση φυ-ıv Πλαıσíυ-ηıλó-γησηc σφ-πυργ∊í Aııκηφıκńc-sTaπαıuGuıσηc &-λ∊κφρvıκńc Aiaia (3£íκvrησOTηc. KA’ EK7i5£UTiKr| Zaσıct-uńuα-∊vıκń c Aic-θvıκń-χλń ^η-[ióiac Aıíκησηc. (in Greek).

  • Halvorsen T. Hauknes J. Miles I. & Røste R. (2005). On the differences between public and private sector innovation. Oslo: NIFU STEP.

  • Hartley J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public ser-vices: Past and present. Public Money and Management 25(1) 27-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x.

  • Hersey P. Blanchard K. H. & Johnson D. E. (2011). Management of organizational behaviour: Leading human resources. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

  • Hsuan-Kai C Hsuan-Yueh C Hsin-Hung W. & Wen-Tsann L. (2004). TQM implementation in a healthcare and pharmaceutical logistics organization: The case of Zuellig Pharma in Taiwan. Total Qual-ity Management and Business Excellence 15(9-10) 1171-1178. DOI: 10.1080/1478336042000255550.

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2000). Quality management systems: Fundamentals and vo-cabulary. Geneva: ISO.

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2009). Managing for the sustained success of an organization: A quality management approach. Geneva: ISO.

  • Ivan-Ungureanu C & Marcu M. (2006). The Lisbon strategy. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting 3(1) 74-83.

  • James P. (1998). Mávατp. ∊vτ-λıκń c; Πıóτηταq. Athens: Prentice Hall. (in Greek).

  • Julnes P. & Holzer M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measurement in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review 61(6) 693-708. DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00140.

  • Kazakou K. (2010). To Koiıvó Πλαíσı-ηıλóγησηc ωc evíκηaAdo ρıia Aıíκηση-λıκń c Πıóτηταc.-∊σσαλ-]: ΠspspactKÓ Lvotitouto Em(óρωσηc„-fi-αc Aη(ióσıυ-ávατ (i∊vτ. (in Greek).

  • Knowles E. S. & Linn JA. (2004). The importance of resistance to persuasion. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Ed.) Resistance and persuasion (pp. 3-9). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Kotter J. P. Schlesinger L. A & Sathe V. (1986). Organization: Text cases and readings on the management of organizational design and change. Homewood IL: Irwin.

  • Kuperus H. & Rode A. (2008). Top public managers in Europe: Management and working conditions of the senior civil servants in European Union member States. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Ad-ministration.

  • Llewellyn N. & Jones G. (2003). Controversies and conceptual development: Examining public entre-preneurship. Public Management Review 5(2) 245-266. DOI: 10.1080/1461667032000066426.

  • Luijn H. Keuzenkamp S. & McDonnell S. (2004). Does leave work: Summary. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultu-reel Planbureau.

  • Massey A. (1999). Public Policy and Administration. Quality Issues in the Public Sector 14(3) 1-14. DOI: 10.1177/095207679901400301.

  • Matei L. & Lazˇr CG. (2011). Quality management and the reform of public administration in several states in South-Eastern Europe: Comparative Analy-sis. Theoretical and Applied Economics 18(4) 65-98.

  • Matei A. & Sabin Andreescu S. (2005). Managementul calitˇţii totale în sectorul public: Experienţe euro-pene. In International Conference of Public administration at the beginning of the third millennium: Dis-seminating the best Japanese practices in Romania 21-22 Novembre 2005 (pp. 50-58). Bucharest: Facul-tatea de Administraţie Publicˇ. (in Romanian).

  • Matheson A. & Hae-Sang H. (2003). Public sector modernization: A new agenda. OECD Journal on Budgeting 3(1) 7-23.

  • Moustakis V. (2012). Aııκητıκń-∊χvλγíα. Chania: Disigma. (in Greek).

  • Oakland J. S. & Porter L. J. (2003). TQM: Text with Cas-es. Burlington: Elsevier.

  • OECD. (2001). Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2001. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. DOI: 10.1787/eag-2001-en.

  • OECD. (2003). The e-Government Imperative. OECD Journal on Budgeting 3(1) 61-96.

  • Passas P. (2010). Texts of application tools of public management in Greek public administration: Lecture notes. Athens: National School of Public Administration. (in Greek).

  • Pollitt C & Bouckaert G. (1995). Quality improvement in European public services: Concepts cases and com-mentary. London: Sage.

  • Pollitt C & Bouckaert G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.

  • Robbins S. P. (1998). Organizational behavior: Concepts controversies and applications. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Rosenfeld R. H. & Wilson D. C. (1999). Managing organ-izations: Text readings and cases. London: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

  • Smye M. & Cooke R. (1994). The key to corporate sur-vival: change begins and ends with people. In L. A. Berger M. J. Sikora & D. R. Berger (Ed.) The change management handbook: A road map to corporate transformation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Sotirakou T. & Zeppou M. (2006). Utilizing performance measurement to modernize the Greek public sector. Management Decision 44(9) 1277-1304. DOI:10.1108/00251740610707730.

  • Staes P. & Thijs N. (2005). Quality management on the European agenda. Eipascope 2005(1) 33-41.

  • Stashevsky S. & Elizur D. (2000). The effect of quality management and participation in decision-making on indi-vidual performance. Journal of Quality Management 5(1) 53-65. DOI:10.1016/S1084-8568(00)00012-2.

  • Tsiotras C. (2000). ∊λτíωση Πıóτητα c;. Athens: Benos. (in Greek)

  • Wanberg C. R. & Banas J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(1) 132-142. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.132.

  • Wong M. S. Hideki N & George P. (2011). The use of importance-performance analysis (ipa) in evaluating Japan's E-government services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 3(2) 17-30. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-18762011000200003.

  • Young P. C. (2012). Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: An introduction. Berlin: Springer.

  • Zampetakis LA. & Moustakis V. (2007). Entrepreneur-ial behavior in the Greek public sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 13(1)19-38. DOI: 10.1108/13552550710725165.

  • Zavlanos M. (2006). Πıóτητα στı cΠαρ∊χóu∊v∊ę-πηρ∊-σí∊c; καı τα Πρïóvτα. Athens: Stamoulis Publications. (in Greek).

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 383 218 4
PDF Downloads 180 124 0