In this paper, we indicate how Jan Woleński’s non-linguistic concept of the norm allows us to clarify the deontic relationship between sentences and the given normative system. A relationship of this kind constitutes a component of the metalogic of relating deontic logic, which subjects the logical value of the deontic sentence to the logical value of the constituent sentence and its relationship with a given normative system in the accessible possible worlds.
1. Carmo, J., and A. Jones. Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, In D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 8, Springer Science+Business Media, 2002, pp. 147-264.
2. Epstein, R. Relatedness and implication, Philosophical Studies 36 (2), 1979, pp. 137-173.
3. Epstein, R. (with the assistance and collaboration of: W. Carnielli, I. D’Ottaviano, S. Krajewski, R. Maddux). The Semantic Foundations of Logic. Volume 1. Propositional Logics, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 1990.
4. Fagin, R., and J. Y. Halpern. Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 34, 1988, pp. 39-76.
5. Hilpinen, R. Deontic logic, In L. Goble (ed.), Blackwell guide to philosophical logic, Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd., 2001, pp. 159-182.
6. Hilpinen, R., and P. McNamara. Deontic logic. A historical survey and introduction, In D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden and L. van der Torre (eds.), Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, London: College Publications, 2013, pp. 3-136.
7. Hintikka, J. Deontic logic and its philosophical morals, In J. Hintikka, Models for Modalities, Dordrecht: Springer, 1969, pp. 184-214.
8. Jadacki, J. J. The Polish 20th century philosophers’ contribution to the theory of imperatives and norms, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2), 2011, pp. 106-145.
9. Jarmużek, T. Relating semantics as fine-grained semantics for intensional propositional logics, In A. Giordani and J. Malinowski (eds.), Logic in High Definition. Current Issues in Logical Semantics, London: Springer 2020, pp. 19-36
10. Jarmużek, T., and B. Kaczkowski, On some logic with a relation imposed on formulae. Tableau system F, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 43 (1/2), 2014, pp. 53-72.
11. Jarmużek, T., and M. Klonowski, On logic of strictly-deontic modalities. A semantic and tableau Approach, Logic and Logical Philosophy 29 (3), 2020, pp. 335-380.
12. Jarmużek, T., and M. Klonowski. Some intensional logics defined by relating semantics and tableau systems, In A. Giordani and J. Malinowski (eds.), Logic in High Definition. Current Issues in Logical Semantics, London: Springer, 2020, pp. 37-54.
13. Jörgensen, J. Imperatives and logic, Erkenntnis 7, 1937, pp. 288-296.
14. Opałek, K. Argumenty za nielingwistyczną koncepcją normy. Uwagi dyskusyjne, Studia Prawnicze 3–4, 1985, pp. 205-218.
15. Opałek, K., and J. Woleński. Logika i interpretacja powinności, Krakowskie Studia Prawnicze 21, 1988, pp. 13-29.
16. Searle, J. How to derive ought from is, Philosophical Review 73 (1), 1964, pp. 43-58.
17. Woleński, J. Spór o znaczenie normatywne, In Naturalistyczne i antynaturalistyczne interpretacje humanistyki, Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM, 1966, pp. 3-14.
18. Woleński, J. Z zagadnień analitycznej filozofii prawa, Warszawa, Kraków: PWN, 1980 (Wydanie drugie, zmienione i rozszerzone: Kraków, Wydawnictwo Aureus, 2012).
19. Woleński, J. Naturalizm, antynaturalizm i metaetyka, Folia Philosophica 29, 2011, pp. 241-256.
20. Woleński, J. Próba naturalistycznej interpretacji norm i ocen, Etyka 50, 2015, pp. 29-47.
21. Woleński, J. Wykłady o naturalizmie, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, 2016.