Questions about the nature of reality and consciousness remain unresolved in philosophy today, but not for lack of hypotheses. Ontologies as varied as physicalism, microexperientialism and cosmopsychism enrich the philosophical menu. Each of these ontologies faces a seemingly fundamental problem: under physicalism, for instance, we have the ‘hard problem of consciousness,’ whereas under microexperientialism we have the ‘subject combination problem.’ I argue that these problems are thought artifacts, having no grounding in empirical reality. In a manner akin to semantic paradoxes, they exist only in the internal logico-conceptual structure of their respective ontologies.
1. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
2. Black, D. and Grant, J. The Essential Companion to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2014.
3. Chalmers, D. Consciousness and its Place in Nature. In.S. Stich and T. Warfield (eds.). Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.
4. Chalmers, D. The Combination Problem for Panpsychism. In G. Brüntrup and L. Jaskolla (eds.). Panpsychism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
5. Coleman, S. The Real Combination Problem: Panpsychism, Micro-subjects, and Emergence. Erkenntnis 79, 2014, pp. 19-44.
6. Dennett, D. Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin Books, 1991.
7. Goff, P. Why Panpsychism Doesn’t Help Us Explain Consciousness. Dialectica 63, 2009, pp. 289-311.
8. Griffin, D. Unsnarling the World-Knot. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 1998.
9. Hameroff, S. Consciousness, Neurobiology and Quantum Mechanics: The Case for a Connection. In J. Tuszynski (ed.). The Emerging Physics of Consciousness, Berlin: Springer, 2006.
10. Kastrup, B. An Ontological Solution to the Mind-Body Problem. Philosophies 2, 2017, doi: 10.3390/philosophies2020010.
11. Kastrup, B. On the Plausibility of Idealism: Refuting Criticisms. Disputatio, 2017 (in print).
12. Koch, C. The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach. Englewood: Roberts & Company Publishers, 2004.
13. Levine, J. Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64, 1983, pp. 354-361.
14. Linde, A. Universe, Life, Consciousness. A paper delivered at the Physics and Cosmology Group of the ‘Science and Spiritual Quest’ program of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences (CTNS), Berkeley, CA, 1998. Available from: web.stanford.edu/~alinde/SpirQuest.doc.
15. Nagasawa, Y. and Wager, K. Panpsychism and Priority Cosmopsychism. In. G. Brüntrup and L. Jaskolla (eds.). Panpsychism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
16. Rosenberg, G. A Place for Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
17. Sellars, W. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.
18. Shani, I. Cosmopsychism: A Holistic Approach to the Metaphysics of Experience. Philosophical Papers 44, 2015, pp. 389-437.