Locating Critical Circular and Unconstrained Failure Surface in Slope Stability Analysis with Tailored Genetic Algorithm

Open access


This article presents an efficient search method for representative circular and unconstrained slip surfaces with the use of the tailored genetic algorithm. Searches for unconstrained slip planes with rigid equilibrium methods are yet uncommon in engineering practice, and little publications regarding truly free slip planes exist. The proposed method presents an effective procedure being the result of the right combination of initial population type, selection, crossover and mutation method. The procedure needs little computational effort to find the optimum, unconstrained slip plane. The methodology described in this paper is implemented using Mathematica. The implementation, along with further explanations, is fully presented so the results can be reproduced. Sample slope stability calculations are performed for four cases, along with a detailed result interpretation. Two cases are compared with analyses described in earlier publications. The remaining two are practical cases of slope stability analyses of dikes in Netherlands. These four cases show the benefits of analyzing slope stability with a rigid equilibrium method combined with a genetic algorithm. The paper concludes by describing possibilities and limitations of using the genetic algorithm in the context of the slope stability problem.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Bengtsson M.G. 1993 Genetic algorithms URL http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/MathSource/569/

  • [2] Cheng Y. Location of critical failure surface and some further studies on slope stability analysis Computers and Geotechnics 2003 30(3) 255–267.

  • [3] Cheng Y. Li L. Chun Chi S. Wei W. Particle swarm optimization algorithm for the location of the critical noncircular failure surface in two-dimensional slope stability analysis Computers and Geotechnics 2007 34(2) 92–103.

  • [4] Das S.K. Slope stability analysis using genetic algorithm Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 2005 10 429–439.

  • [5] Gao W. Forecasting of landslide disasters based on bionics algorithm. Part 1: Critical slip surface searching Computers and Geotechnics 2014 61 370–377.

  • [6] Garg A. Garg A. Tai K. Barontini S. Stokes A. A computational intelligence-based genetic programming approach for the simulation of soil water retention curves Transport in Porous Media 2014 103(3) 497–513.

  • [7] Goh A.T. Genetic algorithm search for critical slip surface in multiple-wedge stability analysis Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1999 36(2) 382–391.

  • [8] Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning 1st Ed. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc. Boston MA USA 1989.

  • [9] Li Y.-C. Chen Y.-M. Zhan T.L. Ling D.-S. Cleall P.J. An efficient approach for locating the critical slip surface in slope stability analyses using a real-coded genetic algorithm Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2010 47(7) 806–820.

  • [10] Madej J. Metody sprawdzania stateczności zboczy Wydawnictwo Komunikacji Łączności 1981.

  • [11] Manouchehrian A. Gholamnejad J. Sharifzadeh M. Development of a model for analysis of slope stability for circular mode failure using genetic algorithm Environmental Earth Sciences 2014 71(3) 1267–1277.

  • [12] Matthews C. Farook Z. Helm P. Slope stability anlysis – limit equilibrium or finite element method? Ground Engineering 2014 22–28.

  • [13] McCombie P. Wilkinson P. The use of the simple genetic algorithm in finding the critical factor of safety in slope stability analysis Computers and Geotechnics 2002 29(8) 699–714.

  • [14] Osiński P. Rickson R.J. Hann M.J. Koda E. Assessment of slope stability influenced by vegetation cover and additional loads applied Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences Land Reclamation 2014 46(2) 81–91.

  • [15] Pasik T. Liniowa analiza numeryczna zachowania się gruntu pod fundamentem bezpośrednim przy wykorzystaniu czterowęzłowego elementu skończonego z wygładzonym polem naprężeń Acta Sci. Pol. Architectura 2016 15(1) 15–26.

  • [16] Pasik T. Van der Meij R. 2016. Locating critical circular and unconstrained failure surface in slope stability analysis with tailored genetic algorithm – mathematica code.

  • [17] Sarma S.K. Tan D. Determination of critical slip surface in slope analysis Gotechnique 2006 56(8) 539–550.

  • [18] Sas W. Głuchowski A. Bursa B. Szymański A. Energy-based analysis of permanent strain behaviour of cohesive soil under cyclic loading Acta Geophysica 2017 65(2) 331–344.

  • [19] Sengupta A. Upadhyay A. Locating the critical failure surface in a slope stability analysis by genetic algorithm Applied Soft Computing 2009 9(1) 387–392.

  • [20] Srokosz P. Slope stability analysis by variational method with genetic algorithm application Part 4: Parallel genetic algorithms Archives of Civil Engineering 2009 55(2) 229–256.

  • [21] Toll D. Asquith J. Fraser A. Hassan A. Liu G. Lourenco S. Mendes J. Noguchi T. Osiński P. Stirling R. Tensiometer techniques for determining soil water retention curves Asia-Pacific Conference on Unsaturated Soil At Guilin China 2015.

  • [22] Van M.A. Koelewijn A.R. Barends F.B.J. Uplift phenomenon: Model validation and design International Journal of Geomechanics 2015 5(2) 98–106.

  • [23] Van der Meij R. Sellmeijer J.B. A genetic algorithm for solving slope stability problems: From bishop to a free slip plane [in:] T. Benz S. Nordal (Eds.) Proceedings of NUMGE 2010. Taylor & Francis Group 2010 345–350

  • [24] Wellin P. Programming with Mathematica: An Introduction Cambridge University Press Cambridge Books Online 2013.

  • [25] Zhu J.-F. Chen C.-F. Search for circular and noncircular critical slip surfaces in slope stability analysis by hybrid genetic algorithm Journal of Central South University 2014 21(1) 387–397.

  • [26] Zolfaghari A.R. Heath A.C. McCombie P.F. Simple genetic algorithm search for critical non-circular failure surface in slope stability analysis Computers and Geotechnics 2005 32(3) 139–152.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.213
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.106

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 867 182 2
PDF Downloads 344 196 4