Stress-Dilatancy for Soils. Part III: Experimental Validation for the Biaxial Condition

Open access


The validation of the general stress-dilatancy relationship is shown based on biaxial compression test data presented in the literature under drained and undrained conditions. Rowe’s and Bolton’s relationships can be treated as simplified forms of the general stress-dilatancy relationship. The stress ratio values are a function of not only the dilatancy but also the intermediate principal stress, the non-coaxiality angle defined by Gutierrez and Ishihara and the stress-strain path. For many granular soils, the critical frictional state angle of the shearing resistance Φo = Φ′cv and parameters α and β are functions of the drainage condition, the stress level and the stress and strain paths.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] BARDEN L. KHAYATT A.J. WIGHTMAN A. Elastic and slip components of the deformation of sand Canadian Geotechnical J. 1969 Vol. 6 No. 3 227-240.

  • [2] BISHOP A.W. Test requirements of measuring the coefficient of earth pressure at rest Proc. European Conf. Earth Pressure Problems Brussels 1958 1 2-14.

  • [3] BOLTON M.D. The strength and dilatancy of sands Geotechnique 1986 36 No. 1 65-78.

  • [4] CHU J. LEROUEIL S. LEONG W.K. Unstable behaviour of sand and its implication for slope stability Canadian Geotechnical J. 2003 Vol. 40 No. 5 873-885.

  • [5] CORNFORTH D.H. Some experiments on the influence of strain conditions on the strength of sand Geotechnique 1964 14 No. 2 143-167.

  • [6] DRESCHER A. VARDOULAKIS I. HAN C. A biaxial apparatus for testing soils Geotech. Testing J. ASTM 1990 13 No. 3 226-234.

  • [7] FINNO R.J. ALARCON M.A. MOONEY M.A. VIGGIANI G. Shear bands in plane strain active tests of moist tamped and pluviated sands Proc. of the Fount. Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng. Hamburg 1997 295-298.

  • [8] GAJO A. BIGONI D. WOOD M. Multiple shear band development and related instabilities in granular materials J. Mech. Phus. Solids 2004 52 No. 12 2683-2724.

  • [9] GREEN G.E. READES D.W. Boundary conditions anisotropy and sample shape effects on the stress-strain behaviour of sand in triaxial compression and plane strain Geotechnique 1975 25 No. 2 333-356.

  • [10] GUTIERREZ M. WANG J. Non-coaxial version of Rowe’s stress-dilatancy relation Granular Matter 2009 Vol. 11 129-137.

  • [11] HAN C. DRESCHER A. Shear bands in biaxial tests on dry coarse sand Soils and Foundations 1993 Vol. 33 No. 1 118-132.

  • [12] HORNE M.R. The Behaviour of an Assembly of Rotund Rigid Cohesionless Particles. I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1965 Vol. 286 No. 1404 62-78.

  • [13] HORNE M.R. The Behaviour of an Assembly of Rotund Rigid Cohesionless Particles. II. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1965 Vol. 286 No. 1404 79-97.

  • [14] LAM W.-K. TATSUOKA F. Effects of initial anisotropic fabric and σ2 on strength and deformation characteristics of sand Soils and Foundations 1988 Vol. 28 No. 1 89-106.

  • [15] MASUDA T. TATSUOKA F. YAMADA S. SATO T. Stressstrain behaviour of sand in plane strain compression extension and cyclic loading tests Soils and Foundations 1999 Vol. 39 No. 5 31-45.

  • [16] ODA M. KOISHIKAWA I. HIGUCHI T. Experimental study of anisotropic shear strength of sand by plane strain test Soils and Foundations 1978 Vol. 18 No. 1 25-38.

  • [17] PRADHAN T.B.S. TATSUOKA F. HORII N. Strength and deformation characteristics of sand in torsional simple shear Soils and Foundations 1988 Vol. 28 No. 3 131-148.

  • [18] ROSCOE K.H. The influence of strains in soil mechanics Geotechnique 1970 25 No. 2 333-356.

  • [19] ROWE P.W. The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact Proc. Roy. Soc. Sen. A. 1962 269 500-527.

  • [20] ROWE P.W. The relation between the shear strength of sands in triaxial compression plane strain and direct shear Geotechnique 1969 36 No. 1 65-78.

  • [21] SZYPCIO Z. Stress-dilatancy for soils. Part I: The frictional state theory Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 2016 Vol. 38 No. 4 51-57.

  • [22] SZYPCIO Z. Stress-dilatancy for soils. Part II: Experimental validation for triaxial tests. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 2916 Vol. 38 No. 4 59-65.

  • [23] TATSUOKA F. SAKAMOTO M. KAWAMURA T. FUKUSHIMA S. Strength and deformation characteristics of sand in plane strain compression at extremely low pressures Soils and Foundations 1986 Vol. 26 No. 1 65-84.

  • [24] TATSUOKA F. NAKAMURA S. HUANG C. TANI K. Strength anisotropy and shear bend direction in plane strain tests of sound Soil and Foundations 1990 Vol. 30No. 1 35-54.

  • [25] TOPOLNICKI M. Observed stress-strain behaviour of remoulded saturated clay and examination of two constitutive models Publ. of the Institute of Soil and Rock Mechanics in Karlsruhe 1987 107.

  • [26] VARDOULAKIS I. Shear bend inclination and shear modulus of sand in biaxial test Int. J. Num. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 1980 4 103-119.

  • [27] WANATOWSKI D. CHU J. Effect of Specimen Preparation Method on the Stress-Strain Behaviour of Sand in Plane- Strain Compression Tests Geotechnical Testing Journal 2008 Vol. 31 No. 4 308-320.

  • [28] WANATOWSKI D. Asymptotic behaviour of sand in planestrain compression tests Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 2007 Vol. 29 No. 3-4 1-26.

  • [29] WANATOWSKI D. Undrained instability of loose sand under plane-strain conditions and its engineering application Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2007 No. 10 131-141.

  • [30] WANATOWSKI D. Strain softening and instability of sand. Experimental study under plane-strain conditions VDM Verlag 2009.

  • [31] YASIN S.J.M. TATSUOKA F. Stress history-dependent deformation characteristics of dense sand in plane strain Soils and Foundations 2000 40 No. 2 77-98.

  • [32] ZHUANG L. NAKATA Y. KIM U.G. KIM D. Influence of relative density particle shape and stress path on the plane strain compression behaviour of granular materials Acta Geotechnica 2014 No. 9(2) 241-255.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.213
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.106

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 152 57 4
PDF Downloads 245 158 15