On Some Methods in Safety Evaluation in Geotechnics

Open access


The paper demonstrates how the reliability methods can be utilised in order to evaluate safety in geotechnics. Special attention is paid to the so-called reliability based design that can play a useful and complementary role to Eurocode 7. In the first part, a brief review of first- and second-order reliability methods is given. Next, two examples of reliability-based design are demonstrated. The first one is focussed on bearing capacity calculation and is dedicated to comparison with EC7 requirements. The second one analyses a rigid pile subjected to lateral load and is oriented towards working stress design method. In the second part, applications of random field to safety evaluations in geotechnics are addressed. After a short review of the theory a Random Finite Element algorithm to reliability based design of shallow strip foundation is given. Finally, two illustrative examples for cohesive and cohesionless soils are demonstrated.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] ASHRAF A.A. ABDALLAH S.B. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Seepage below and around Hydraulic Structures J. Hydrologic Eng. 2009 14(3) 243-247.

  • [2] ALONSO E. KRIZEK R.J. Stochastic formulation of soil properties Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering Vol. II Aachen 1975 9-32.

  • [3] BOWLES J.E. Foundation analysis and design 5th ed. McGraw-Hill 1996.

  • [4] BOX G.P. DRAPER N.R. Empirical model-building and response surface J. Wiley & Sons New York 1996.

  • [5] BREITUNG K. Asymptotic approximation for multinormal integrals J. Eng. Mech. ASCE. 1984 110(3) 357-366.

  • [6] BRINCH HANSEN J. The ultimate resistance of rigid piles against transversal force The Danish Geotechnical Institute Bulletin No. 12 Copenhagen 1961.

  • [7] CAFARO F. CERUBINI C. COTECCHIA F. Use of the scale of fluctuation to describe the geotechnical variability of an Italian clay Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering eds. Melchers and Stewart Rotterdam 2000 481-486.

  • [8] CHERUBINI C. Probabilistic approach to the design of anchored sheet pile walls Computers and Geotechnics 2000 26(3-4) 309-330.

  • [9] CHERUBINI C. VESSIA G. PUŁA W. Statistical soil characterization of Italian sites for reliability analysis Characterization and Engineering Properties of Natural Soil eds. Tan W. Phoon K.K. Hight Lerouell Singapore Taiwan 2007 2681-706.

  • [10] CHOK Y.H. JAKSA M.B. GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. KAGGWA W.S. A parametric study on reliability of spatially random cohesive slopes Australian Geomechanics 2007 42(2) 79-85.

  • [11] CORNELL C.A. A first-order reliability theory for structural design Study No. 3 Structural Reliability and Codified Design University of Waterloo Ontario 1969.

  • [12] CORNELL C.A. A probability-based Structural Code ACI Journal 1969 66(12) 974-985.

  • [13] DER KIUREGHIAN A. KE J.-D. The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 1988 3(2) 83-91.

  • [14] DITLEVSEN O. Principle of Normal Tail Approximation Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE. 1981 107(EM6) 1191-1208.

  • [15] DITLEVSEN O. MADSEN H.O. Structural Reliability Methods John Wiley & Sons Chichester 1996.

  • [16] EN 1997-1:2004. Eurocode 7. Geotechnical Design Part 1: General Rules. CEN European Committee for Standardization Brussels.

  • [17] EN 1990:2002. Eurocode: Basis of structural design. CEN European Committee for Standardization Brussels.

  • [18] FENTON G.A. VANMARCKE E. Simulation of random fields via local average subdivision ASCE J. Geotech. Eng. 1990 116(8) 1733-1749.

  • [19] FENTON G.A GRIFFITHS D.V. Bearing capacity prediction of spatially random c-φ soils Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2003 40(1) 54-65.

  • [20] FENTON G.A. GRIFFITHS D.V. CAVERS W. Resistance factors for settlement design Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2005 42(5) 1422-1436.

  • [21] FENTON G.A. GRIFFITHS D.V. ZHANG X.Y. Load and resistance factor design of shallow foundations against bearing failure Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2008 45(11) 1556-1571.

  • [22] FENTON G.A. GRIFFITHS D.V. Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering John Wiley & Sons New York 2008.

  • [23] FISZ M. Probability theory and mathematical statistics Wiley New York 1960.

  • [24] GHANEM R. SPANOS P. Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach Springer-Verlag New York 1991.

  • [25] GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. Seepage beneath water retaining structures founded on spatially random soil Geotechnique 1993 43(6) 577-587.

  • [26] GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. Probabilistic analysis of exit gradients due to steady seepage Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1998 124(9) 789-797.

  • [27] GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. Bearing capacity of spatially random soil: The undrained clay Prandtl problem revisited Geotechnique 2001 54(4) 351-359.

  • [28] GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. TVETEN D.E. Probabilistic earth pressure analysis by the Random Finite Element Method Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG 05) G. Barla and M. Barla (eds.) Turin 2005 4 235-249.

  • [29] GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. ZIEMANN H.R. The influence of strength variability in the analysis of slope failure risk Proc. of the Second Japan-U.S. Workshop on Testing Modeling and Simulation Kyoto P.V. Lade and T. Nakai (eds.) 2005 also in: Geotechnical Special Publication 2006 156 113-123.

  • [30] GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. ZIEMANN H.R. Reliability of passive earth pressure Georisk: Assessment and Manag. of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 2008 2(2) 113-121.

  • [31] GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. Probabilistic settlement analysis by stochastic and random finite element methods Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2009 135(11) 1629-1637.

  • [32] HASOFER A.M. LIND N.C. An Exact and Invariant First- Order Reliability Format Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE 1974 100(EM1) 111-121.

  • [33] HISADA T. NAKAGIRI S. Stochastic finite element developed for structural safety and reliability Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability ICOSSAR-3 1981 395-408.

  • [34] HOHENBICHLER M. GOLLWITZER S. KRUSE W. RACKWITZ R. New light on first and second-order reliability methods Structural Safety 1987 4 267-284.

  • [35] HOHENBICHLER M. RACKWITZ R. Improvement of the secondorder reliability estimates by importance sampling Journal Eng. Mech. ASCE 1988 114(12) 2195-2199.

  • [36] KUO Y.L. JAKSA M.B. KAGGWA W.S. FENTON G.A. GRIFFITHS D.V. GOLDSWORTHY J.S. Probabilistic analysis of multi-layered soil effects on shallow foundation settlement Proc. of 9th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics G. Farquhar et al. (eds.) University of Auckland 2004 2 541-547.

  • [37] LIU P.L. DER KIUREGHIAN A. Optimization algorithms for structural reliability Structural Safety 1991 9 161-177.

  • [38] LOW B.K. TANG W.H. Reliability analysis using objectoriented constrained optimization Structural Safety 2004 26(1) 69-89.

  • [39] LOW B.K. TANG W.H. Efficient spreadsheet algorithm for first-order reliability method Journal Eng. Mech ASCE 2007 133(12) 1378-1387.

  • [40] LOW B.K. PHOON K.K. Reliability based design and its complementary role to Eurocode 7 design approach Computers and Geotechnics 2015 65 30-44.

  • [41] LUMB P. The variability of natural soils Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1966 3(2) 74-97.

  • [42] NUTTALL J.D. HICKS M.A. LLORET CABOT M. Stochastic approach to slope stability analysis with in-situ data Industrial safety and life cycle engineering 2013 527-538.

  • [43] PIECZYŃSKA J. Random finite element method in analysis of a bearing capacity of a shallow foundation PhD Thesis Wrocław University of Technology 2012 (in Polish).

  • [44] PIECZYŃSKA-KOZŁOWSKA J.M. PUŁA W. GRIFFITHS D.V. FENTON G.A. Influence of embedment self-weight and anisotropy on bearing capacity reliability using the random finite element method Computers and Geotechnics 2015 67 229-238.

  • [45] PN-EN 1997-1:2008/Ap2. Polish annex to PN-EN 1997-1:2008.

  • [46] PUŁA W. Applications of Structural Reliability Theory to safety evaluation of Foundations Wrocław University of Technology Press 2004 (in Polish).

  • [47] PUŁA W. Reliability of laterally loaded rigid piles [in:] Probabilistic methods in geotechnical engineering CISM Courses and Lectures Springer 2007 No. 491 169-183.

  • [48] PUŁA W. RÓŻAŃSKI A. Reliability of rigid piles subjected to lateral loads ACME 2012 12 205-218.

  • [49] PUŁA W. ZASKÓRSKI Ł. Estimation of the probability distribution of the bearing capacity of cohesionless soil using the random finite element method Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2014 11 (5) 707-720.

  • [50] RACKWITZ R. FIESSLER B. Structural reliability under combined random loads sequences Computers and Structures 1978 9 489-494.

  • [51] RACKWITZ R. Reviewing probabilistic soils modeling Computers and Geotechnics 2000 26(3-4) 309-330.

  • [52] ROSENBLATT M. Remarks on a multivariate transformation Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1952 23 470-472.

  • [53] THAO N.T.P. Geotechnical analysis of a chosen region of the Wrocław city by statistical method Wrocław University of Technology Wrocław 1984 (in Polish).

  • [54] TOMLINSON M.J. Foundation design and construction 7th ed. Prentice Hall 2001.

  • [55] TVEDT L. Two second-order approximations to the failure probability Det Norske Veritas RDIV/20-004-83 1983.

  • [56] VANMARCKE E.H. Probabilistic Modeling of Soil Profiles Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division ASCE 1977 103(GT11) 1227-1246.

  • [57] VANMARCKE E.H. Reliability of earth slopes J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 1977 103(GT11) 1247-1265.

  • [58] VANMARCKE E.H. Random Fields - Analysis and Synthesis. MIT Press 1983.

Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.213
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.106

Cited By
Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 360 158 8
PDF Downloads 208 121 6