The Oral History Interview – A Relationship and Space of Trust


The oral history interview is a “multi-layered communicative event”. It is a unique, active event, reflective of a specific culture and of a particular time and space. Interviews, more precisely biographical interviews, are the tool I have been using for decades. The relationship between the interviewer and interviewee is, therefore, an essential question for me. I interview people to find out what happened to them, how they felt about it, how they recall it and what wider public memory they draw upon. Focused on the biographical narratives, as well as in-depth and repeated interviews, I have constantly faced ethical and moral questions in accordance with my role as a listener, and as a partner in the interview, but also as a scholar with the goal of using the interview in my scientific work. In my text, I would like to develop Hourig Attarian’s inspiring ideas on self-reflexivity, which brings to light the grey zones that we encounter in our work. This is often a difficult and fragile process. It is central to the connections that I create with the interviewees in my projects. These people always affect the course of my work, but also me personally. This balancing act is an exercise. I try to understand my own limits, I try to push my own boundaries, and assess how each of these circumstances impacts my research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abrams, L. (2016). Oral History Theory. 2st Edition. New York: Routledge.

  • Assmann, A. (2016). Shadows of Trauma, New York: Fordham University Press.

  • Attarian, H. (2013). Encounters in Vulnerability, Familiarity, and Friendship. In: A. Sheftel, S. Zembrzycki (Eds.), Oral History Off the Record. Toward an Ethnography of Practice. Foreword by Steven High. Afterword by Alessandro Portelli. Palgrave Macmillan (pp. 77–80).

  • Aviram, R. B. (2009). The Relational Origins of Prejudice a Convergence of Psychoanalytic and Social Cognitive Perspectives. Jason Aronson.

  • Behar, R. (1996). The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Bornat, J. (1998). Oral History as a Social Movement. In: R. Perks, A. Thomson (Eds.), The Oral History Reader. New York: Rout -ledge (pp. 189–205).

  • Delbo, Ch. (1985). Auschwitz and After. New Haven: Yale Univesity Press.

  • Felman, Sh., Laub, D. (1991). Testimonies: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History. London: Routledge.

  • Greenspan, H. (2010). On Listening to the Holocaust Survivor: Beyond Testimony. St. Paul’s Minnesota: Paragon House.

  • Hartman, G. (2002). The Ethics of Witness. An interview with Geoffrey Hartman. Interviewed by Ian Balfour and Rebecca Comay, conducted on December 29, 2000, Published in Lost in the Archives, September 2002, Toronto, Ont.: Alphabet City Media (pp. 492–509).

  • Kushner, T. (2006). Holocaust Testimony, Ethics, and the Problems of Representation. Poetics Today, 27(2), 275–291.

  • LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing History: Writing Trauma. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Levi, P. (1996). Survival in Auschwitz. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • Norkumas, M. (2013). The Vulnerable Listener. In: A. Sheftel, S. Zembrzycki (Eds.), Oral History Off the Record. Toward an Ethnography of Practice. Foreword by Steven High. Afterword by Alessandro Portelli. Palgrave Macmillan (pp. 81–96).

  • Portelli, A. (1991). What Makes Oral History Different? In: A. Portelli. The Death of Luigi Trastulli and Other Stories: Form and Meaning in Oral History. New York (pp. 45–58).

  • Portelli, A. (2003). The Order has Been Carried Out. History, Memory and Meaning of a Nazi Massacre in Rome. Palgrave.

  • Rice, M. (2017). “What! Still Alive?!”: Jewish Survivors in Poland and Israel Remember Homecoming (Modern Jewish History). New York: Syracuse University Press.

  • Sheftel A., Zembrzycki S. (2010). Only Human: A Reflection on the Ethical and Me -thodological Challenges of Working with “Difficult” Stories. The Oral History Review, 37(2), 191–214.

  • Thompson, P., Bornat, J. (Eds.) (2017). The Voice of the Past. Oral History. Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press.

  • Vaněk, M. (2013). Around the Globe. Rethin-king Oral History with Its Protagonists. Prague: Charles University.

  • Vrzgulová, M. (2017). Repräsentationen des Nationalaufstands in der Slowakei nach 1989. In: M. Zückert, J. Zarusky, V. Zimmermann (Eds.), Partisanen im Zweiten Weltkrieg Der Slowakische Nationalauf-stand im Kontext der europäischen Wider-standsbewegungen. Collegium Carolinum Bd. 37, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (pp. 297–312).

  • Vrzgulová, M. (2018). The memory of the Return of Slovak Holocaust Survivors in Jewish and non-Jewish Testimonies. Judaica Bohemiae, LIII(2), 53–76.

  • Wieviorka, A. (2006). The Era of the Witness, New York: Ithaca.

  • Yow, V. (1995). Ethics and Interpersonal Relationships in Oral History Research. Oral History Review, 22(1), 51–66.

  • Yow, V. (2006). Do I Like Them Too Much? Effects of the Oral History Interview on the Interviewer and Vice-versa. In: R. Perks, A. Thomson (Eds.), The Oral History Reader, Second Edition. New York: Routledge (pp. 54–72).


Journal + Issues