Appearance and Existence in Mandarin Chinese

Open access


In Mandarin Chinese, the string of three overt elements in a row, a locative, a verb, and a nominal, asserts the existence of the entity denoted by the nominal in the location. This paper argues that the verb is contained in an adjunct, whereas the locative in its base position and the nominal establish a matrix predication relation. Thus, instead of the overt verb, the head of the matrix predicate of the construction is null. Moreover, a new analysis is provided to explain the obligatory argument sharing between the verb and the matrix predication of the construction. Furthermore, the paper argues that the agent of a transitive verb in certain types of embedded clauses needs to be Case-licensed by either the v of the selecting verb, as in an ECM construction, or a local c-commanding functional element, such as a complementizer, as in the English infinitive for construction. This Case-licensing explains why the transitive verb in the string has no agent. The research shows that the syntactic strategies to license abstract Cases in Chinese are similar to the ones found in other languages. Finally, the paper argues that the post-verbal -zhe is an adessive marker when it occurs in a non-progressive context.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abbott Barbara. 1993. A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existential sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 19(1). 39–55.

  • Abbott Barbara. 1997. Definiteness and existentials. Language 73(1). 103–108.

  • Aissen Judith. 1975. Presentational-there insertion: A cyclic root transformation. In Robin E. Grossman James L. San & Timothy J. Vance (eds.) Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 11 1–14. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  • Bobaljik Jonathan David & Samuel Brown. 1997. Inter-arboreal operations: Head-movement and the extension requirement. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2). 345–356.

  • Boeckx Cedric. 2003. (In) Direct binding. Syntax 6(3). 213–236.

  • Bošković Zeljko. 2018. On the coordinate structure constraint across-the-board-movement phases and labeling. Unpublished manuscript University of Connecticut. Available on LingBizz lingbuzz/003894

  • Boye Kasper & Peter Harder. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3). 569–606.

  • Chao Yuan Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

  • Chierchia Gennaro. 1984. Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.

  • Chomsky Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Cinque Guglielmo. To appear. The syntax of relative clauses: A unified analysis. Cambridge University Press.

  • Comrie Bernard & Kaoru Horie. 1995. Complement clauses versus relative clauses: Some Khmer evidence. In Werner Abraham Talmy Givón & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.) Discourse grammar and typology: Papers in honor of John W.M. Verhaar 65–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Cuervo María Cristina. 2014. Alternating unaccusatives and the distribution of roots. Lingua 141. 48–70.

  • Deal Amy Rose. 2009. The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 12(4). 285–323.

  • Diesing Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Francez Itamar. 2007. Existential propositions. Stanford CA: Stanford University dissertation.

  • Fu Jingqi. 1994. On deriving Chinese derived nominals: Evidence for V-to-N raising. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.

  • Her One-Soon. 2009. Apparent subject-object inversion in Chinese. Linguistics 47(5). 1143–1181.

  • Hornstein Norbert. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Malden MA: Blackwell.

  • Hornstein Norbert & Hirohisa Kiguchi. 2002. PRO gate and movement. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(1). 33–46.

  • Hornstein Norbert & Jairo Nunes. 2002. On asymmetries between parasitic gap and across-the-board constructions. Syntax 5(1). 26–54.

  • Huang C.-T. James. 1987. Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In Eric Reuland & Alice Ter Meulen (eds.) The representation of (in)definiteness 226–253. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Huang C.-T. James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29(4). 423–509.

  • Huang C.-T. James Yen-Hui Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Irwin Patricia. 2012. Unaccusativity at the interfaces. New York: New York University dissertation.

  • Irwin Patricia. 2018. Existential unaccusativity and new discourse referents. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–42.

  • Karakoç Birsel & Annette Herkenrath. 2016. Clausal complementation in Turkish and Noghay in a semantic perspective. In Kasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.) Complementizer semantics in European languages. 619–664. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Kaufmann Ingrid. 1995. Konzeptuelle Grundlagen semantischer Dekompositionsstrukturen: Die Kombinatorik lokaler Verben und prädikativer Komplemente. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Kayne Richards. 2002. Pronoun and their antecedents. In Samuel Epstein & Daniel Seely (eds.) Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program 133–166. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Kural Murat. 2002. A four-way classification of monadic verbs. In Artemis Alexiadou (ed.) Theoretical approaches to universals 139–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Legate Julie Anne. 2008. Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1). 55–101.

  • Levin Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Levin Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Li Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Li Yen-Hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Springer.

  • Li Yen-Hui Audrey. 1996. Definite and indefinite existential constructions. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1/2). 175–191.

  • Li Yen-Hui Audrey. 2013. Case tense and clauses. In Hilary Chappell Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.) Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond 205–235. Taipei: Academia Sinica.

  • Li Yen-Hui Audrey. 2014. Thematic hierarchy and derivational economy. Language and Linguistics 15(3). 295–339.

  • Li Yen-Hui Audrey. 2016. Review article of Waltraud Paul’s new perspectives on Chinese syntax (2015). Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1). 1–17.

  • Liao Wei-wen R. & Tzong-hong J. Lin. 2019. Syntactic structures of Mandarin purposives. Linguistics 57(1). 87–126.

  • Lin Jo-Wang. 2002. Aspectual selection and temporal reference of the Chinese aspectual marker -zhe. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 32(2). 257–295.

  • Lin Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine CA: University of California Irvine dissertation.

  • Lin Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2008. Locative subject in Mandarin Chinese. Nanzan Linguistics 4. 69–88.

  • Lu Jianming. 2004. ‘Jushi yufa’ lilun yu Hanyu yanjiu [The construction grammar and study of Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 5. 412–416.

  • Lu Jianming. 2019. Xiandai Hanyu yufa yanjiu fazhande licheng [The progressing process of the syntactic research of Mandarin Chinese]. Talk given at Shangwu Yinshuguan Beijing 20 July.

  • Lü Shuxiang. 1965. Fangwei-ci shiyong qingkuang de chubu kaocha [A preliminary investigation of the use of localizers]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 3. 206–210.

  • McCawley James D. 1992. Justifying part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese linguistics 20(2). 211–246.

  • McCloskey James. 2014. Irish existentials in context. Syntax 17(4). 343–384.

  • McNally Louise. 1992. An interpretation for the English existential construction. Santa Cruz CA: University of California Santa Cruz dissertation.

  • McNally Louise. 1997. A semantics for the English existential construction. New York: Garland.

  • McNally Louise. 2011. Existential sentences. In Klaus von Heusinger Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.) Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning vol. 2 1829–1848. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Milsark Gary. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

  • Milsark Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3. 1–29.

  • Nakajima Heizo. 2001. Verbs in locative constructions and the generative lexicon. The Linguistic Review 18(1). 43–67.

  • Newmeyer Frederick J. 2010. What conversational English tells us about the nature of grammar: A critique of Thompson’s analysis of object complements. In Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.) Language usage and language structure 3–43. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Nunes Jairo. 2001. Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32(2). 303–344.

  • Nunes Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Nunes Jairo & Juan Uriagereka. 2000. Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3(1). 20–43.

  • Pan Haihua. 1996. Imperfective aspect zhe agent deletion and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14(2). 409–432.

  • Partee Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Jeroen Groenendijk Jeroen Groenendijk Dick de Jongh & Martin Stokhof (eds.) Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. [Reprinted in Paul Portner & Barbara Partee (eds.) Formal semantics: The essential readings 357–381. Oxford: Blackwell 2002.]

  • Partee Barbara H. & Vladimir Borschev. 2004. The semantics of Russian genitive of negation: The nature and role of perspectival structure. In Robert B. Young (ed.) Proceedings of the Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT)14 212–234. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.

  • Ramchand Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Shinzato Rumiko. 2011. Nominalization in Okinawan: From a diachronic and comparative perspective. In Foong Ha Yap Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.) Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives 445–472. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Svenonius Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.) Mapping spatial PPs (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6) 127–160. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Tang Ting-Chi C. 2000. Finite and nonfinite clauses in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 191–214.

  • Teng Shou-Hsin. 1978. Modification and the structures of existential sentences. In Robert L. Cheng Ying-che Li & Ting-chi Tang (eds.) Proceedings of symposium of Chinese linguistics LSA 197–210. Taipei: Student Books.

  • Thompson Sandra A. 1983. Grammar and discourse: The English detached participial clause. In Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.) Discourse perspectives on syntax 43–65. New York: Academic Press.

  • Tsao Feng-fu. 1996. Hanyu de tisheng dongci [raising verbs in Chinese] Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 3. 172–182.

  • Venhuizen Noortje J. Johan Bos Petra Hendriks & Harm Brouwer. 2018. Discourse semantics with information structure. Journal of Semantics 35(1). 127–169.

  • Wang Chyan-An Arthur & Hsiao-Hung Iris Wu. 2018. The syntax and semantics of Chinese impersonal V-Qilai construction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 16(1). 1–34.

  • Wang Hsuan-Hsiang Sam. 2018. The syntactic structures of derived nominals in Mandarin Chinese. Chiayi: National Chung Cheng University MA thesis.

  • Ward Gregory & Betty Birner. 1995. Definiteness and the English existential. Language 71(4). 722–742.

  • Wilder Chris. 1997. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Artemis Alexiadou & T. Alan Hall (eds.) Studies on universal grammar and typological variation 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Williams Edwin. 1994. Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Williams Edwin. 2006. The subject-predicate theory of there. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4). 648–651.

  • Wu Hsiao-Hung Iris. 2008. Generalized inversion and the theory of agree. Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

  • Zhang Niina Ning. 2002. Movement within a spatial phrase. In Hubert Cuyckens & Guenter Radden (eds.) Perspectives on prepositions (Linguistische Arbeiten) 47–63. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Zhang Niina Ning. 2008. Existential coda constructions as internally headed relative clause constructions. The Linguistics Journal 3(3). 8–54.

  • Zhang Niina Ning. 2016. Identifying Chinese dependent clauses in the forms of subjects. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25(3). 275–311.

  • Zhang Niina Ning. 2017. Adpositions. In Rint Sybesma Wolfgang Behr Yueguo Gu Zev Handel C.-T. James Huang & James Myers (eds.) Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics vol. 1 116–122. Leiden: Brill.

  • Zhang Niina Ning. 2018. Non-canonical objects as event kind-classifying elements. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(4). 1395–1437.

  • Zhang Niina Ning. 2019. Sentence-final aspect particles as finite markers in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 57(5). 967–1023.

  • Zhu Dexi. 1982. Yufa jiangyi [Lectures on grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The commercial press].

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 120 120 44
PDF Downloads 136 136 54