A Cartographic Analysis of the Syntactic Structure of Mandarin Ba

Open access

Abstract

This paper analyzes the syntactic properties of the “ba-construction” or “disposal form” in Mandarin Chinese under new theoretical frameworks. By introducing the event-decomposition method proposed by Ramchand (2008), it argues that the ba-construction conveys the causativity and the resultativity of the event at the same time, which can be shown from the syntactic representation. Then, this paper tests the position of ba, assuming that it is a functional head, and the result of the test indicates that ba is a voice head in the hierarchy of functional projections proposed by Cinque (1999, 2006). The final word order of a ba-construction can be derived by the argument movement of the direct object and by a head movement of ba or by the merge of ba at the head position of the higher functional head of a split VoiceP.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Basciano Bianca. 2010. Verbal compounding and causativity in mandarin Chinese. Verona: University of Verona dissertation.

  • Belletti Adriana Naama Friedmann Dominique Brunato & Luigi Rizzi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10). 1053–1069.

  • Bender Emily. 2000. The syntax of mandarin bǎ: Reconsidering the verbal analysis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9(2). 105–145.

  • Chappell Hilary. 2006. From eurocentrism to sinocentrism: The case of disposal constructions in sinitic languages. Trends in linguistics Studies and Monographs 167. 441–486.

  • Chappell Hilary. 2007. Hanyu fangyan de chuzhi biaoji leixing [Typology of object marking constructions: a pan-Sinitic view]. Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on linguistics] 36. 183–209.

  • Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen & James Huang. 1994. On the argument structure of resultative compounds. In Matthew Chen & Ovid Tzeng (eds.) In honor of William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language chance 187–221. Nottingham: Pyramid Press.

  • Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen. 1997. Resultative compounds and lexical relational structures. In Feng-fu Tsao & Samuel H. Wang (eds.) Chinese Languages and Linguistics III: Morphology and Lexicon 167–197. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica.

  • Cinque Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Cinque Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Crystal David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics 6th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Davidson. Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.) The logic of decision and action 81–94. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

  • Higginbotham James. 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. In Higginbotham James. Pianesi Fabio & Varzi Achille Carlo (eds.) Speaking of events 49–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Huang C-T. James. 1992. Complex predicates in control. In Richard K. Larson Sabine Iatridou Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds.) Control and grammar 109–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Huang Cheng-Teh James Yen-hui Audrey Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kayne Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax (Linguistic inquiry monographs 25). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Kayne Richard S. 2005. Prepositions as probes. In Movement and silence 85–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kuo Pei-Jung. 2010. Transitivity and the ba construction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 8(1). 95–128.

  • Li Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 2006. Chinese ba. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Blackwell companion to syntax vol. 1 374–468. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Liu Feng-Hsi. 1990. Scope dependency in English and Chinese Los Angeles CA: University of California Los Angeles Dissertation.

  • Liu Feng-Hsi. 1997. An aspectual analysis of BA. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6(1). 51–99.

  • Paul Waltraud. 1988. The syntax of verb-object phrases in Chinese: Constraints and reanalysis. Paris: Languages Croises.

  • Paul Waltraud. 2002. Proxy categories in phrase structure theory and the Chinese VP. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 31(2). 137–174.

  • Paul Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 271). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

  • Peyraube Alain. 1985. Les structures en BA en chinois vernaculaire médiéval et moderne. Cahiers de Linguistique - Asie Orientale 14(2). 193–213.

  • Ramchand Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first-phase syntax (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Starke Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into merge: A theory of locality. Geneva: University of Geneva dissertation.

  • Sybesma Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. Dordrecht Netherlands & Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Thompson Sandra A. 1973. Transitivity and some problems with the ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1. 208–221.

  • Wang Li. 1945. Zhongguo yu fa li lun [Theory of Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju [Zhonghua book company].

  • Wang Li. 1954. Zhongguo xiandai yufa [Chinese modern grammar]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju [Zhonghua book company].

  • Whitman John & Waltraud Paul. 2005. Reanalysis and conservancy of structure in Chinese. In Montserrat Batllori Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds.) Grammaticalization and Parametric change 82–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Zou Ke. 1993. The syntax of the Chinese ba construction. Linguistics 31(7). 15–36.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 451 451 33
PDF Downloads 431 431 46