Remarks on the Final-over-Final Condition: A View from Chinese Head-Final Structures

Open access

Abstract

The paper discusses the universality of the final-over-final condition (FOFC). It has been proposed that sentence-final particles (SFPs) in Chinese may invalidate the universality of FOFC. This paper argues that the challenge from SFPs is inconclusive since the evidence for the head status of SFPs is lacking. On the other hand, the leftward complement of N0 in Chinese (Huang 2016) poses a greater threat to FOFC. However, it is argued that the violation is caused by a language-particular word order constraint due to Case directionality (Li 1990). Relating the syntactic FOFC violation to the word order constraint in compounds, it is proposed that FOFC may be understood as an instance of the shape conservation principle (Williams 2003), where the language-particular constraint is satisfied at the expense of a minimal violation of the universal condition.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abraham Werner. 2000. Modal particles in German: Word classification and legacy beyond grammaticalization. In Peter M. Vogel and Bernard Comrie (eds.) Approaches to the typology of word classes 321–350. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Bayer Josef. 2012. From modal particle to interrogative marker. A study of German denn. In Laura Brugé Anna Cardinaletti Giuliana Giusti Nicola Munaro and Cecilia Poletto (eds.) Functional heads (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 7) 13–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bhatt Rajesh. 1999. Covert modality in non-finite contexts. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.

  • Biberauer Theresa. 2017. FOFC and particles. In Michelle Sheehan Theresa Biberauer Ian Roberts and Anders Holmberg (eds.) The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Biberauer Theresa Anders Holmberg and Ian Roberts. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 169–225.

  • Biberauer Theresa and Michelle Sheehan (eds). 2013. Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bruening Benjamin. 2010. Ditransitive asymmetries and a theory of idiom formation. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 519–562.

  • Chan Hok-Shing Brian. 2013. Sentence-final particles complementizers antisymmetry and the final-over-final constraint. In Theresa Biberauer and Michelle Sheehan (eds.) Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order 445–468. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chomsky Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language 1–52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Cinque Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Erlewine Michael Yoshitaka. 2017. Low sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese and the final-over-final constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26. 37–75.

  • Feng Shengli. 1998. Prosodic structure and compound words in classical Chinese. In Jerome Packard (ed.) New approaches to Chinese word formation 197–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Feng Shengli. 2002. Prosodic syntax and morphology in Chinese. München: Lincom Europa.

  • Fukui Naoki and Yuji Takano. 1998. Symmetry in syntax: Merge and demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7. 27–86.

  • Gast Volker. 2008. Modal particles and context updating – the functions of German ja doch wohl and etwa. In Ole Letnes Eva Maagerø and Heinz Vater (eds.) Modalität und Grammatikalisierung 153–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

  • Grano Thomas. 2015. Control and restructuring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Grano Thomas. 2017. Finiteness contrasts without tense? A view from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26. 259–299.

  • Hacquard Valentine. 2006. Aspects of modality. Cambridge MA: MIT dissertation.

  • Hacquard Valentine. 2009. On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy 32. 279–315.

  • Horn Larry. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61. 121–174.

  • Huang C.-T. James. 2016. The syntax and semantics of prenominals: Construction or composition? Language and Linguistics 17. 431–475.

  • Kayne Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Ko Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23. 867–916.

  • König Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.

  • Lai Huei-ling. 1999. Rejected expectations: The scalar particles cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 37. 625–661.

  • Lee Thomas Hun-tak. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles CA: University of California Los Angeles dissertation.

  • Li Charles and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 1992. Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1. 125–156.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 693–702.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 1999. Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8. 75–99.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 2012. Mandarin de ↔ Taiwanese e. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33. 17–40.

  • Li Yen-hui Audrey. 2013. P-insertion and ellipsis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34. 99–128.

  • Liao Wei-wen Roger. 2011. The symmetry of syntactic relations. Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California dissertation.

  • Liao Wei-wen Roger. 2014a. On the loss of identity and emergence of order: Symmetry breaking in linguistic theory. In Kuniya Nasukawa and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Identity relations in grammar 289–320. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Liao Wei-wen Roger. 2014b. Morphology. In C.-T. James Huang Y.-H. Audrey Li and Andrew Simpson (eds.) The handbook of Chinese linguistics 3–25. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Liao Wei-wen Roger. 2016. The up and down of even. Paper presented at Theoretical Linguistics at Keio (TaLK-2016). Keio University 7–9 August.

  • Liao Wei-wen Roger and Wei-cheng Sam Jheng. 2015. How do we get even? Paper presented at the 10th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-10). Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 13–14 June.

  • Lin Jowang and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: A GB perspective. The Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology 66. 53–104.

  • Lin Tzong-hong Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14. 151–186.

  • Lin Tzong-hong Jonah. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48. 151–186.

  • Myler Neil. 2009. Form function and explanation at the syntax/morphology interface: Agreement agglutination and post-syntactic operations. Cambridge: University of Cambridge M. Phil. Dissertation.

  • Packard Jerome. 2000. The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pan Victor Junnan. 2015. Mandarin peripheral construals at syntax-discourse interface. The Linguistic Review 32. 819–868.

  • Pan Victor Junnan and Waltraud Paul. 2016a. Why Chinese SFPs are neither optional nor disjunctors. Lingua 170. 23–34.

  • Pan Victor Junnan and Waltraud Paul. 2016b. What you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complements. In Josef Bayer and Volker Struckmeier (eds.) Discourse particles: Formal approaches to their syntax and semantics 49–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Paul Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68. 77–115.

  • Paul Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Prince Alan and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden MA: Blackwell Pub.

  • Rizzi Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Rizzi Luigi. 2004. The structure of CP and IP. New York NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Roberts Ian. 2017. FOFC and moprhology. In Michelle Sheehan Theresa Biberauer Ian Roberts and Anders Holmberg (eds.) The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Schwarzschild Roger. 2006. The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9. 67–110.

  • Seuren Pieter A. M. 1988. Presupposition and negation. Journal of Semantics 6. 175–226.

  • Sheehan Michelle Theresa Biberauer Ian Roberts and Anders Holmberg (eds.) 2017. The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Soh Hooi Ling. 2009. Speaker presupposition and Mandarin Chinese sentence-final le: A unified analysis of the “change of state” and the “contrary to expectation” reading. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27. 623–657.

  • Soh Hooi Ling and Meijia Gao. 2006. Perfective aspect and transition in Mandarin Chinese: An analysis of double -le sentences. In Pascal Denis Eric McCready Alexis Palmer and Brian Reese (eds.) Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society conference 107–122. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Starosta Stanley Koenraad Kuiper Siew-ai Ng and Zhi-qian Wu. 1998. On defining the Chinese compound word: Headedness in Chinese compounding and Chinese VR compounds. In Jerome Packard (ed.) New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese 347–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Takano Yuji. 1996. Movement and parametric variation in syntax. Irvine CA: University of California Irvine dissertation.

  • Takita Kensuke. 2009. If Chinese is head-initial Japanese cannot be. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18. 41–61.

  • Tang C-C. Jane. 1990. A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics 28. 337–354.

  • Tang C-C. Jane. 2005. Nouns or classifiers: A non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 6. 431–472.

  • Tang Sze-Wing. 2006. Yueyu kuangshi xuci de jufa fenxi [A syntactic analysis of the discontinuous construction of function words in Cantonese]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese linguistics] 14. 16–23.

  • Tang Sze-Wing. 2015. A generalized syntactic schema for utterance particles in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 1(3). 1–23.

  • Tang Sze-Wing and Siu-Pong Cheng. 2014. Aspects of Cantonese grammar. In C.-T. James Huang Y.-H. Audrey Li and Andrew Simpson (eds.) The handbook of Chinese linguistics 601–628. Malden MA: Blackwell.

  • Tsai Wei-tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10. 129–168.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. 2015. A case of V2 in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 36. 81–108.

  • Williams Edwin. 2003. Representational theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Zhang Niina. 1999. Chinese de and the de construction. Syntaxis 2. 27–49.

  • Zhang Niina. 2012. De and the functional expansion of classifiers. Language and Linguistics 13. 569–582.

  • Zimmermann Malte. 2008. Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Benjamin Shaer Philippa Cook Werner Frey and Claudia Maienborn (eds.). Dislocated elements in discourse: Syntactic semantic and pragmatic perspectives 200–231. London: Routledge.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2946 747 8
PDF Downloads 258 153 5