Remarks on the Final-over-Final Condition: A View from Chinese Head-Final Structures

Wei-wen Roger Liao 1
  • 1 Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica,


The paper discusses the universality of the final-over-final condition (FOFC). It has been proposed that sentence-final particles (SFPs) in Chinese may invalidate the universality of FOFC. This paper argues that the challenge from SFPs is inconclusive since the evidence for the head status of SFPs is lacking. On the other hand, the leftward complement of N0 in Chinese () poses a greater threat to FOFC. However, it is argued that the violation is caused by a language-particular word order constraint due to Case directionality (). Relating the syntactic FOFC violation to the word order constraint in compounds, it is proposed that FOFC may be understood as an instance of the shape conservation principle (), where the language-particular constraint is satisfied at the expense of a minimal violation of the universal condition.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abraham, Werner. 2000. Modal particles in German: Word classification and legacy beyond grammaticalization. In Peter M. Vogel and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 321–350. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Bayer, Josef. 2012. From modal particle to interrogative marker. A study of German denn. In Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, and Cecilia Poletto (eds.), Functional heads (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 7), 13–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bhatt, Rajesh. 1999. Covert modality in non-finite contexts. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.

  • Biberauer, Theresa. 2017. FOFC and particles. In Michelle Sheehan, Theresa Biberauer, Ian Roberts, and Anders Holmberg (eds.), The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, and Ian Roberts. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 169–225.

  • Biberauer, Theresa, and Michelle Sheehan (eds). 2013. Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. Ditransitive asymmetries and a theory of idiom formation. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 519–562.

  • Chan, Hok-Shing Brian. 2013. Sentence-final particles, complementizers, antisymmetry, and the final-over-final constraint. In Theresa Biberauer and Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Theoretical approaches to disharmonic word order, 445–468. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2017. Low sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese and the final-over-final constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26. 37–75.

  • Feng, Shengli. 1998. Prosodic structure and compound words in classical Chinese. In Jerome Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation, 197–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Feng, Shengli. 2002. Prosodic syntax and morphology in Chinese. München: Lincom Europa.

  • Fukui, Naoki, and Yuji Takano. 1998. Symmetry in syntax: Merge and demerge. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7. 27–86.

  • Gast, Volker. 2008. Modal particles and context updating – the functions of German ja, doch, wohl, and etwa. In Ole Letnes, Eva Maagerø, and Heinz Vater (eds.), Modalität und Grammatikalisierung, 153–177. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

  • Grano, Thomas. 2015. Control and restructuring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Grano, Thomas. 2017. Finiteness contrasts without tense? A view from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26. 259–299.

  • Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of modality. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.

  • Hacquard, Valentine. 2009. On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy 32. 279–315.

  • Horn, Larry. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61. 121–174.

  • Huang, C.-T. James. 2016. The syntax and semantics of prenominals: Construction or composition? Language and Linguistics 17. 431–475.

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23. 867–916.

  • König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.

  • Lai, Huei-ling. 1999. Rejected expectations: The scalar particles cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 37. 625–661.

  • Lee, Thomas Hun-tak. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.

  • Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1992. Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1. 125–156.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 693–702.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1999. Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8. 75–99.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2012. Mandarin de ↔ Taiwanese e. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33. 17–40.

  • Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2013. P-insertion and ellipsis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34. 99–128.

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2011. The symmetry of syntactic relations. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2014a. On the loss of identity and emergence of order: Symmetry breaking in linguistic theory. In Kuniya Nasukawa, and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Identity relations in grammar, 289–320. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2014b. Morphology. In C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson (eds.) The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 3–25. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2016. The up and down of even. Paper presented at Theoretical Linguistics at Keio (TaLK-2016). Keio University, 7–9 August.

  • Liao, Wei-wen Roger, and Wei-cheng Sam Jheng. 2015. How do we get even? Paper presented at the 10th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-10). Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 13–14 June.

  • Lin, Jowang, and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: A GB perspective. The Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology 66. 53–104.

  • Lin, Tzong-hong Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14. 151–186.

  • Lin, Tzong-hong Jonah. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48. 151–186.

  • Myler, Neil. 2009. Form, function, and explanation at the syntax/morphology interface: Agreement, agglutination and post-syntactic operations. Cambridge: University of Cambridge M. Phil. Dissertation.

  • Packard, Jerome. 2000. The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pan, Victor Junnan. 2015. Mandarin peripheral construals at syntax-discourse interface. The Linguistic Review 32. 819–868.

  • Pan, Victor Junnan, and Waltraud Paul. 2016a. Why Chinese SFPs are neither optional nor disjunctors. Lingua 170. 23–34.

  • Pan, Victor Junnan, and Waltraud Paul. 2016b. What you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complements. In Josef Bayer, and Volker Struckmeier (eds.), Discourse particles: Formal approaches to their syntax and semantics, 49–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68. 77–115.

  • Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. The structure of CP and IP. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Roberts, Ian. 2017. FOFC and moprhology. In Michelle Sheehan, Theresa Biberauer, Ian Roberts, and Anders Holmberg (eds.), The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Schwarzschild, Roger. 2006. The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9. 67–110.

  • Seuren, Pieter A. M. 1988. Presupposition and negation. Journal of Semantics 6. 175–226.

  • Sheehan, Michelle, Theresa Biberauer, Ian Roberts, and Anders Holmberg (eds.) 2017. The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Soh, Hooi Ling. 2009. Speaker presupposition and Mandarin Chinese sentence-final le: A unified analysis of the “change of state” and the “contrary to expectation” reading. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27. 623–657.

  • Soh, Hooi Ling, and Meijia Gao. 2006. Perfective aspect and transition in Mandarin Chinese: An analysis of double -le sentences. In Pascal Denis, Eric McCready, Alexis Palmer, and Brian Reese (eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society conference, 107–122. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

  • Starosta, Stanley, Koenraad Kuiper, Siew-ai Ng, and Zhi-qian Wu. 1998. On defining the Chinese compound word: Headedness in Chinese compounding and Chinese VR compounds. In Jerome Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology, phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese, 347–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Takano, Yuji. 1996. Movement and parametric variation in syntax. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine dissertation.

  • Takita, Kensuke. 2009. If Chinese is head-initial, Japanese cannot be. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18. 41–61.

  • Tang, C-C. Jane. 1990. A note on the DP analysis of the Chinese noun phrase. Linguistics 28. 337–354.

  • Tang, C-C. Jane. 2005. Nouns or classifiers: A non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 6. 431–472.

  • Tang, Sze-Wing. 2006. Yueyu kuangshi xuci de jufa fenxi [A syntactic analysis of the discontinuous construction of function words in Cantonese]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese linguistics] 14. 16–23.

  • Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. A generalized syntactic schema for utterance particles in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 1(3). 1–23.

  • Tang, Sze-Wing, and Siu-Pong Cheng. 2014. Aspects of Cantonese grammar. In C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 601–628. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10. 129–168.

  • Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2015. A case of V2 in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 36. 81–108.

  • Williams, Edwin. 2003. Representational theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Zhang, Niina. 1999. Chinese de and the de construction. Syntaxis 2. 27–49.

  • Zhang, Niina. 2012. De and the functional expansion of classifiers. Language and Linguistics 13. 569–582.

  • Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn (eds.). Dislocated elements in discourse: Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic perspectives, 200–231. London: Routledge.


Journal + Issues