Chinese Motion-Directional Construction: A Conceptual and Cognitive Analysis

Open access


This article proposes an analysis of the Motion-Directional Construction in Chinese in the Conceptual-Cognitive approach as outlined by Jackendoff and Langacker. This article first argues that the Motion-Directional Construction consists of conceptual subordination, expressing different mental spaces. Then, it examines the syntactic and semantic behaviors of the construction arguing that it is more like a constructional idiom. In particular, we discuss the case of pa ‘climb’ and generalize further that the motion verbs in Chinese typically express manners of movement. Within the Conceptual Semantics, we argue that a level of grammatical relation may not be necessary; it is the argument and conceptual structures that we need in the cognitive structure. Finally, we present the data and suggest the typological relevance of the Motion-Directional Construction.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bickerton Derek. 2008. Bastard tongues: A trailblazing linguist finds clues to our common humanity in the world’s lowliest languages. New York: Hill and Wang.

  • Bickerton Derek. 2013. The origins of syntactic language. In Maggie Tallerman and Kathleen Gibson (eds.) The Oxford handbook of language evolution 456–468. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Boas Hans C. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Boeckx Cedric. 2006. Linguistic minimalism: Origins concepts methods and aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bybee Joan. 2013. Domain-general processes as the basis for grammar. In Maggie Tallerman and Kathleen Gibson (eds.) The Oxford handbook of language evolution 528–536. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chao Yuen Ren. 1968. The grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

  • Cheung Hung Nin Samuel. 2007. Xianggang Yueyu yufa de yanjiu [A grammar of Cantonese as spoken in Hong Kong]. The Chinese University Press.

  • Chomsky Noam. 2015. Exploring the boundaries of Babel. In Andrea Moro The boundaries of Babel xi–xiii. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Cristofaro Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cristofaro Sonia. 2014. Is there really a syntactic category of subordination? In Laura Visapää Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva (eds.) Context of subordination: Cognitive typological and discourse perspectives 73–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Croft William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Croft William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Culicover Peter W. 2013. Explaining syntax: Representations structure and computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Culicover Peter W. 2015. Simpler syntax and the mind: Reflections on syntactic theory and cognitive science. In Ida Toivonen Piroska Csúri and Emile van der Zee (eds.) Structures in the mind: Essays on language music and cognition in honor of Ray Jackendoff 3–20. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Culicover Peter W. and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Farrell Patrick. 2005. Grammatical relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Fauconnier Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Fauconnier Gilles. 2007. Mental spaces. In Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics 351–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Fauconnier Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

  • Fong Ronald. 2015. A constructional-cognitive analysis of Chinese directionals. Cognitive Semantics 1(1). 104–130.

  • Fong Ronald. 2016. Chinese as satellite-framed: A constructional-cognitive interpretation. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3(2). 233–258.

  • Geuder Wilhelm and Matthias Weisgerer. 2008. Manner of movement and the conceptualization of force slides Journée d’étude ‘Il y a manière et manière’ Université d’Artois Arras France.

  • Goldberg Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Goldberg Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Huang C-T James Y-H Audrey Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Huddleston Rodney and Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jackendoff Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Jackendoff Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain meaning grammar evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Jackendoff Ray. 2007. Language consciousness culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Jackendoff Ray. 2010. Meaning and the lexicon: The parallel architecture 19752010. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • LaPolla Randy J. 1992. Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘direct object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica 63(4). 759–813.

  • Langacker Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Langacker Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Langacker Ronald W. 2013. Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Langacker Ronald W. 2014. Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In Laura Visapää Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva (eds.) Context of subordination 17–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Levin Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Boban Arsenijević Berit Gehrke and Rafael Marín (eds.) Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates. New York: Springer.

  • Levinson Stephen C. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Li Charles and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Loar Jian Kang. 2011. Chinese syntactic grammar: Functional and conceptual principles. New York: Peter Lang.

  • Slobin Dan. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist and Ludo Verhoeven (eds.) Relating events in narrative volume 2: Typological and contextual perspectives 219–257. Mahwah NJ: LEA.

  • Stassen Leon. 1985. Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Tallerman Maggie. 2013. What is syntax? In Maggie Tallerman and Kathleen Gibson (eds.) The Oxford handbook of language evolution 442–455. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Talmy Leonard. 2016. Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics 2(2). 133–163.

  • Traugott Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Cosntructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Van Valin Robert D Jr and Randy J LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Yiu Yuk Man Carine. 2005. Spatial extension: Directional verbs in Cantonese. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology dissertation.

  • Yiu Yuk-man Carine. 2013. Directional verbs in Cantonese: A typological and historical study. Language and Linguistics 14(3). 511–569.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2948 504 9
PDF Downloads 434 224 8