A Case of V2 in Chinese

Open access


As far as the left periphery is concerned, there is a conspiracy between syntax, semantics, and pragmatics to ensure the success of sentence formation. We would like to put forth the claim that peripheral features play an important role in this endeavor, which can be checked by either Merge or Move according to the parameter-settings of individual languages. Along this line, topic prominence can be regarded as the result of peripheral feature checking, and the null topic hypothesis à la Huang (1984) is reinvented as a null operator merger to fulfill interface economy in the left periphery. In this regard, Chinese provides substantial evidence from obligatory topicalization in outer affectives, evaluatives, and refutory wh-constructions, which applies only when the licensing from a D(efiniteness)-operator is blocked. The idea also extends naturally to the issues concerning pro-drop and bare nominals in general. In this light, we may well compare Chinese obligatory topicalization to those residual cases of verb-second (V2) in English, all being manifestation of the strong uniformity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bayer Josef. 2004. Decomposing the left periphery. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.) The syntax and semantics of the left periphery 59-95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Beghelli Filippo & Tim Stowell. 1996. Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.) Ways of scope taking 71–107. Dordrecht the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Brandner Ellen. 2004. Head-movement in minimalism and V2 as FORCE-marking. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.) The syntax and semantics of the left periphery 97-138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Chao Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkely: University of California Press.

  • Cheng Lisa L.-S. 1991. On the typology of Wh-questions. Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

  • Cheung Lawrence. 2007. Negative Wh-construction: Question-hood negation and implicature. Paper presented at the 4th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-4) The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 30 December.

  • Chomsky Noam. 1977. On Wh-Movement. In Peter Culicover Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajan (eds.) Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press.

  • Chomsky Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature origin and use New York: Praeger.

  • Chomsky Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A life in language 1–52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Cinque Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Diesing Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Haegeman Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses main clause phenomena and the composition of the left periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hamblin Charles L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10. 41-53.

  • Huang C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531-574.

  • Huang C.-T. James. 2004. Syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. Paper presented at 12th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-12) June 18-20.

  • Karttunen Lauri. 1977. The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 3-44.

  • Ko Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23. 867-916.

  • Laenzlinger Christopher & Gabriela Soare. 2005. A cartographic approach to Wh-movement in Romanian. Working Papers in Linguistics 1 23-60. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii Bucureşti.

  • Li Peter. 2013. A Comparative Study of Jianzhi and Jihu. Ms. National Tsing Hua University.

  • Liao Wei-Wen. 2011. The symmetry of syntactic relations. Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California dissertation.

  • Lin Jo-Wang. 1996. Polarity licensing and Wh-Quantification in Chinese. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.

  • Miyagawa Shigeru. 2010. Why move? Why agree? Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Reinhart Tanya. 1997. Interface economy: Focus and markedness. OTS working papers in linguistics. University of Utrecht.

  • Reinhart Tanya. 1998. Wh-in-situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6. 29-56.

  • Rizzi Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar 281-338. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Rizzi Luigi. 2004. Locality and the left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.) Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures vol. 3 223-251. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Saito Mamoru. 2008. Semantic and Discourse Interpretation of the Japanese Left Periphery. Ms. Nanzan University.

  • Saito Mamoru. 2010. Sentence Types and the Japanese Right Periphery. Ms. Nanzan University.

  • Starke Michal. 2001. Merge dissolves into move. Geneva: University of Geneva dissertation.

  • Stepanov Arthur & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai. 2008. Cartography and licensing of WH-Adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26. 589-638.

  • Teng Shou-Hsin. 1974. Double nominatives in Chinese. Language 50. 455-473.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. 1997. On the absence of island effects. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies New Series 27. 125-149.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10. 129-168.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. 2007. On middle applicatives. Paper presented in the 6th GLOW in Asia The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left periphery and How-Why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17. 83-115.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. 2010. High applicatives are not high enough: A cartographic solution. Ms. National Tsing Hua University Taiwan.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. To appear. Causality comitativity contrastivity and selfhood. In Jianhua Hu & Haihua Pan (eds.) Interfaces in grammar. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan. In press. On the topography of Chinese modals. In Ur Shlonsky (ed.) Beyond functional sequence. Oxford University Press.

  • Tsao Feng-Fu. 1979. A Functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book Co.

  • Tsao Feng-Fu. 1982. The double nominative construction in Mandarin Chinese. The Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 14. 275-297.

  • Wechsler Stephen. 1991. Verb second and illocutionary force. In Katherine Leffel & Denis Bouchard (eds.) Views on phrase structure 177-191. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Yang Barry C.-Y. 2014. Licensing Chinese null subjects. In C.-T James Huang & Feng-hsi Liu (eds.) Peaches and plums 203-226. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series. Taipei: Academia Sinica.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 511 161 6
PDF Downloads 201 97 4