Comparision of Dominant Features Identification for Tool Wear in Hard Turning of Inconel 718 by Using Vibration Analysis

Dasari Kondala Rao 1  and Kolla Srinivas 2
  • 1 Dept. of Mechanical Engg, Guntur, India
  • 2 Dept. of Mechanical Engg, Guntur, India


In various machining processes, the vibration signals are studied for tool condition monitoring often referred as wear monitoring. It is essential to overcome unpredicted machining trouble and to improvise the efficiency of the machine. Tool wear is a vital problem in materials such as nickel based alloys as they have high hardness ranges. Though they have high hardness, a nickel based alloy Inconel 718 with varying HRC (51, 53, and 55), is opted as work material for hard turning process in this work. Uncoated carbide, coated carbide and ceramic tools are employed as cutting tools. Taguchi’s L9 orthogonal array is considered by taking hardness, speed, feed and depth of cut as four input parameters, the number of experiments and the combinations of parameters for every run is obtained. The vibration signals are recorded at various stages of cutting, till the tool failure is observed. Taking this vibration signal data as input to ANOVA and Grey relation analysis (GRA) which categorizes the optimal and utmost dominant features such as Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor (CF), Skewness (Sk), Kurtosis (Ku), Absolute Deviation (AD), Mean, Standard Deviation (SD), Variance, peak, Frequency and Time in the tool wear process.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Ezugwu, E. O. “Key improvements in the machining of difficult to cut aerospace superalloys”, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 45 (12–13), pp. 1353 – 1367, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.02.003

  • [2] Olovsjo, S., Nyborg, L. “Influence of micro structure on wear behavior of uncoated WC tools in turning of Alloy718 and Waspalloy”, Wear 282–283, pp. 12 – 21, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.01.004

  • [3] Xiaozhi, C., Beizhi, L. “AE method for tool condition monitoring based on wavelet analysis”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 33 (9), pp. 968 – 976, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0523-5

  • [4] Scheffer, C., Kratz, H., Heyns, S., Klocke, F. “Develpoment of tool wear monitoring system for hard turning”, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 43 (10), pp. 973 – 985, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00110-X

  • [5] Kurada, S., Bradley, C. “A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring”, Computers in Industry 34 (1), pp. 55 – 72, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-3615(96)00075-9

  • [6] Kakade, S., Vijayaraghavan, L., Krishnamurthy, R. “Monitoring of tool status using intelligent acoustic emission sensing and decision based neural network”, IEEE, pp. 25 – 29, 1995. DOI: 10.1109/IACC.1995.465873

  • [7] Lalta, P., Rahul, K. “Study on Breaking Load of Single Lap Joint Using Hybrid Joining Techniques for Alloy Steel AISI 4140 and Mild Steel: Taguchi and Neural Network Approach”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 68 (1), pp. 51 – 60, 2018. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2018-0005

  • [8] Milesich, T., Danko, J., Bucha, J. “Neural Networks - A Way to Increase the Fuel Efficiency of Vehicles”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 68 (1), pp. 81 – 88, 2018. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2018-0008

  • [9] Siddhpura, M., Siddhpura, A., Bhave, S. “Vibration as a parameter for monitoring the health of precision machine tools”, In: Conference, International conference on frontiers in design and manufacturing engineering, Coimbatore (India). Macmillan, India, 2008.

  • [10] Dan, L., Mathew, J. “Tool wear and failure monitoring techniques for turning—a review”, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 30 (4), pp. 579 – 598, 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0890-6955(90)90009-8

  • [11] Rao, S.B. “Tool wear monitoring through the dynamics of stable turning”, J Eng Ind 108 (3), pp. 183 – 190, 1986. DOI: 10.1115/1.3187062

  • [12] Weller, E. J., Schrier, H. M., Weichbrodt, B. “What sound can be expected from worn tool?”, J Eng Ind 91(3), pp. 525 – 534, 1969. DOI: 10.1115/1.3591621

  • [13] Del Taglia, A., Portunato, S., Toni, P. “An approach to online measurement of tool wear by spectrum analysis”, In: Proc 17th international MTDR conference 7, pp. 141 – 148, 1976. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-81484-8_17

  • [14] Pandit, S.M., Kashou, S. “A data dependent system strategy of on-line tool wear sensing”, J Eng Ind 104 (3), pp. 217 – 223, 1982. DOI: 10.1115/1.3185822

  • [15] Pandit, S. M., Kashou, S. “Variation in friction coefficient with tool wear”, Wear 84 (1), pp. 65 – 79, 1983. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(83)90119-9

  • [16] Jiang, C. Y., Zhang, Y. Z., Xu, H. J. “In-Process Monitoring of Tool Wear Stage by the Frequency Band - Energy Method”, CIRP Annals 36 (1), pp. 45 – 48, 1987. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62550-5

  • [17] Teti, R., Jemielniak, K., O’Donnell, G., Dornfeld, D. “Advanced monitoring of machining operations”, CIRP Annals 59 (2), pp. 717 – 739, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010

  • [18] Lu, M. – C., Kannatey – Asibu, E. Jr. “Analysis of Sound Signal Generation Due to Flank Wear in Turning”, J.. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 124 (4), pp. 799 – 808, 2002. DOI: 10.1115/1.1511177

  • [19] Alonso, F. J., Salgado, D. R. “Analysis of the structure of vibration signals for tool wear detection”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 22 (3), pp. 735 – 748, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.012

  • [20] Rajesh, V. G., Narayanan Namboothiri, V. N. “Flank wear detection of cutting tool inserts in turning operation: application of nonlinear time series analysis”, Soft Compute 14, pp. 913 – 919, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-009-0466-5

  • [21] Ding, F., He, Z. “Cutting tool wear monitoring for reliability analysis using proportional hazards model”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 57 (5 – 8), pp. 565–574, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3316-4


Journal + Issues