Happy Or Not? Roots of Student Satisfaction in Class Sessions

  • 1 University of North Carolina at Charlotte, , Charlotte


Businesses and organizations are turning to fast feedback devices that measure consumer satisfaction. These standalone devices often have four or five different smiley-face buttons that can quickly gauge consumer sentiment. These devices are becoming popular due to the short time commitment needed to provide feedback.

This instructor has piloted the use of a smiley-face survey tool that is used at the end of each class session. Initial results suggest the role of the instructor may play a lesser role in student happiness for a given class. External factors, such as outside event or incoming GPA, appear to have a larger effect on class satisfaction. Data from classes and sample email exchanges will be presented. This type of fast feedback system has many potential benefits and low startup costs.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ALDERMAN, LYN, STEPHEN TOWERS, AND SYLVIA BANNAH. “Student feedback systems in higher education: A focused literature review and environmental scan.” Quality in Higher Education 18, no. 3 (2012): 261-280.

  • ARDALAN, ALI, ROYA ARDALAN, SAMUEL COPPAGE, AND WILLIAM CROUCH. “A comparison of student feedback obtained through paper-based and web-based surveys of faculty teaching.” British Journal of Educational Technology 38, no. 6 (2007): 1085-1101.

  • D’AGOSTIN, FABIO. “The Value of Emoticons in Investigating Student Emotions Related to Mathematics Task Negotiation.” Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (2014).

  • FLODÉN, JONAS. “The impact of student feedback on teaching in higher education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42.7 (2017): 1054-1068.

  • Happy or Not Ltd. 2019. “Customer Stories.” Accessed August 3, 2019. https://www.happy-or-not.com/en/customer-stories/

  • HATZIAPOSTOLOU, THANOS, AND IRAKLIS PARASKAKIS. “Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system.” Electronic Journal of e-Learning 8, no. 2 (2010): 111-122.

  • KING, MALCOLM, IAN MORISON, GARY REED, AND GRAZYNA STACHOW. “Student feedback systems in the business school: a departmental model.” Quality assurance in Education 7, no. 2 (1999): 90-100.

  • SOREANU, PETER, AND EMIL SAUCAN. “Semi-continuous monitoring of student feedback in interactive synchronous e-learning environments.” In Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies, pp. 276-277. IEEE, 2003.

  • SURGENOR, PAUL WG. “Obstacles and opportunities: addressing the growing pains of summative student evaluation of teaching.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38, no. 3 (2013): 363-376.

  • VAN DEN BERG, ED. “Teaching, learning, and quick feedback methods.” Australian Science Teachers Journal 49, no. 2 (2003): 28.


Journal + Issues