Displaying Labeled Quantitative Data

Open access


The information world is full of labeled quantitative data, in which a number of qualitative categories are to be compared based on a quantitative variable. Their graphical representations are various and serve different audiences and purposes. Based on a simple data set and its different visualizations, we will play with the data and their visual representation. We will use well-known charts, such as a regular table, a bar plot, and a word cloud; less-know, such as Cleveland’s dot plot, a fan plot, and a text-table; and new ones, constructed for the very aim of this essay, such as a labeled rectangle plot and a ruler-like graph. Our discussion will not aim to choose the best graph but rather to show the different faces of visualizing labeled quantitative data. I hope to convince the readers that it is always worth spending a minute on pondering how to present their data.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BATEMAN S. MANDRYK R. L. GUTWIN C. GENEST A. MCDINE D. & BROOKS C. (2010) Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM pp. 2573-2582.

  • BORKIN M. A. BYLINSKII Z. KIM N. W. BAINBRIDGE C. M. YEH C. S. BORKIN D. PFISTER H. OLIVA A. (2015) Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics Vol. 22 No. 1 pp. 519-528.

  • CLEVELAND W.S. (1994) The elements of graphing data 2nd ed. Summit NJ: Hobart USA.

  • FEW S. (2006) Information dashboard design. The Effective Visual Communication of Data Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.

  • HUFF D. (1954) How to lie with statistics W. W. Norton & Company.

  • JACOBY W. (2006) The dot plot: A graphical display for labeled quantitative values The Political Methodologist Vol. 14 No. 1 pp. 6-14.

  • KOZAK M. (2009) Text-table: an undervalued and underused tool for communicating information. European Science Editing Vol. 35 No. 4 pp. 103-105.

  • KOZAK M. HARTLEY J. WNUK A. TARTANUS M. (2015) Multiple pie charts: Unreadable inefficient and over-used. Journal of Scholarly Publishing Vol. 46 No. 3 pp. 282-289.

  • KOZAK M. KRZANOWSKI W. J. (2010) Effective presentation of data. European Science Editing Vol. 36 No. 2 pp. 41-42.

  • LEMON J. (2006) Plotrix: a package in the red light district of R. R-News Vol. 6 No. 4 pp. 8-12.

  • LEMON J. TYAGI A. (2009) The fan plot: A technique for displaying relative quantities and differences. Statistical Computing and Graphics Newsletter Vol. 20 No. 1 pp. 8-10.

  • R CORE TEAM (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  • TUFTE E.R. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. (1st and 2nd eds.). Cheshire CT: Graphics Press.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 26 26 8
PDF Downloads 40 40 20