US Economic Policy Uncertainty and GCC Stock Market Performance

Saeed Abdullah 1
  • 1 The University of Arizona,

Abstract

The study evaluates the effect of economy policy uncertainty of US on gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries’ stock market returns. The GCC countries are Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman. Granger Causality Tests (GCT) was done primarily to evaluate if economy policy uncertainty granger cause on GCC stock market returns. The analysis established that oil prices granger cause stock market returns for Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE; the same is not true on changes in economic policy uncertainty of US cause on the stock market returns. Changes in economy policy uncertainty in US granger causes on stock market returns of Bahrain. On the other hand, economy policy uncertainty in US does not cause stock market returns in Qatar, UAE, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Vector Autoregression (VAR) analysis establishes that economy policy uncertainty in US negatively responds to the stock market returns of the GCC countries.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahmed, S., Coulibaly, B., & Zlate, A. (2017). International financial spillovers to emerging market economies: How important are economic fundamentals?. Journal of International Money and Finance, 76, 133-152.

  • Al-Maamary, H. M., Kazem, H. A., & Chaichan, M. T. (2017). The impact of oil price fluctuations on common renewable energies in GCC countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 989-1007.

  • Aloui, C., Hammoudeh, S., & ben Hamida, H. (2015). Global factors driving structural changes in the co-movement between sharia stocks and sukuk in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 31, 311-329.

  • Bai, S., Cui, W., & Zhang, L. (2018). The Granger causality analysis of stocks based on clustering. Cluster Computing, 1-6.

  • Bekaert, G., Ehrmann, M., Fratzscher, M., & Mehl, A. (2014). The global crisis and equity market contagion. The Journal of Finance, 69(6), 2597-2649.

  • Bjørnland, H. C., & Zhulanova, J. (2018). The Shale Oil Boom and the US Economy: Spillovers and Time-Varying Effects.

  • Boughanmi, H., Al-Shammakhi, A., & Antimiani, A. (2016). Deeper Integration or Wider Integration?: the case of Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Economic Integration, 206-233.

  • Commins, D. (2015). Islam in Saudi Arabia. IB Tauris.

  • Duenwald, C., & Tamirisa, N. T. (2018). Public Wage Bills in the Middle East and Central Asia. International Monetary Fund.

  • Gay, R. D. (2016). Effect of macroeconomic variables on stock market returns for four emerging economies: Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online), 15(3), 119.

  • Juselius, K. (2006). The cointegrated VAR model: methodology and applications. Oxford university press.

  • Mahedi Masuduzzaman (2012) “Impact of the Macroeconomic Variables on the Stock Market Returns: The Case of Germany and the United Kingdom“, Global Journal of Management and Business Research.

  • Mohamed Arouri & Christophe Rault & Frédéric Teulon, 2014. “Economic policy uncertainty, oil price shocks and GCC stock markets,” Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 1822-1834.

  • Samman, A. (2015). Introduction: Money’s other worlds. Finance and Society, 1(2), 23-26.

  • Saxena, S., & Al Hadrami, A. S. N. (2017). Do We Need a GCC Bank to Facilitate the Economic Turnaround of the GCC Region?. Digest of Middle East Studies, 26(2), 226-247.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search