Investments, Economic Growth and Employment: VAR Method for Romania

Vodă Alina Daniela 1 , Duguleană Liliana 2 , and Dobrotă Gabriela 3
  • 1 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, , Romania
  • 2 Transilvania University, , Braşov, Romania
  • 3 Constantin Brâncuşi University, , Târgu-Jiu, Romania


Economic growth can be seen as an effect of both fiscal policies and different legislative norms applied at national and macroeconomic level. Investments are a determining factor in the evolution of socio-economic life, influencing also the employment rate. This paper aims to identify the influence of investments on economic growth and employment using the vector autoregressive model (VAR). Based on the quarterly data from Romania, between the first quarter of 2000 and the second quarter of 2018, the Granger causality test and the impulse - response function was applied to identify the effect of the investments on the sustainable development of the Romanian economy. The results revealed that investments in Romania influence the economic growth and, implicitly, the employment. In terms of impulse – response function, a negative relationship between investment and employment was identified, which may be due to the fact that the need for human resources is no longer a priority in some sectors of activity due to technology.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alloza, M., (2017), A Very Short Note on Computing Impulse Response Functions, University College, London, available online at

  • Attanasio, O.P., Picci, L., Scorcu, A.E., (2000), Saving, growth, and investment: a macroeconomic analysis using a panel of countries, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 182-211.

  • Blomstrom, M., Lipsey, R.E., Zejan, M., (1993), Is fixed investment the key to economic growth?, NBER Working Papers 4436, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Bond, S., Leblebicioǧlu, A., Schiantarelli, F., (2010), Capital accumulation and growth: a new look at the empirical evidence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1073-1099.

  • Cheung, Y.W., Dooley, M.P., Sushko, V., (2012), Investment and growth in rich and poor countries, NBER Working Papers 17788, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Ghasemi, A., Zahediasl, S., (2012), Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for nonstatisticians, International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 486-489.

  • Jayaraman T. K., and Singh B., (2007), Foreign Direct Investment and Employment Creation in Pacific Island Countries: An Empirical Study of Fiji, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series, no. 35.

  • Jula, D. and Jula, N.M., (2017), Foreign Direct Investments and Employment. Structural Analysis, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 29-44.

  • Maitah, M., Hayat, A., Malec, K. and Eldeeb, O., (2014), The impact of foreign direct investments on employment in the Czech Republic, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1001-1008.

  • Mordecki, G., Ramírez, L., (2014), Investment, growth and employment: VECM for Uruguay, Serie Documentos de Trabajo, FCEA-IE, DT07/14, available online at

  • Mucuk, M. and Demirsel, M.T., (2013), The effect of foreign direct investments on unemployment: evidence from panel data for seven developing countries, Journal of Business, Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 3.

  • Sørensen, B. E., (2005), Granger causality, Economics, 7395, available online at

  • Yaylı, S. and Değer, M. K., (2012), The Relationships Between Foreign Direct Investments and Employment: Dynamic Panel Data Causality Analysis on Developing Countries (1991-2008), Finans, Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, Vol. 49 no. 568, pp. 43-51.


Journal + Issues