Family Entrepreneurship in India’s ‘Diamond City’: A Phenomenological Research

Vimal Babu 1
  • 1 FIIB, , New Delhi, India


The history of family run business in Surat, India is more than 350 years now. However, over the last several decades, it has been observed that family run enterprises in Surat have not been able to scale up the business by untapping opportunities in international markets. The paper aims to explore the experiences of family-run enterprise owners in their attempt to grow their businesses in Surat. Given the stagnant growth trajectory, less expansion, and minimal diversification over the last several decades, the researcher is intrigued to study the experiences of these family-run enterprise owners. As a phenomenological research study, there is only one question: What experiences have these enterprise owners faced in a family-run enterprise as they attempt to grow their businesses? Non-leading prompts were asked to encourage participants to expand their responses to lead to a deeper understanding of those experiences. As respondents, seventeen family-run enterprise owners have been contacted for In-Depth Interview (IDI). The respondents were from diamond, textile and restaurant business in Surat. The study aided in identifying existing challenges and strengths making the whole experience of family-run enterprise owners unique, diverse and different from the conventional businesses operating in different industry. The findings indicate that the potential of family-run enterprises have not been harnessed to its fullest due to prevailing mediocrities, sub-standard practice, sophisticated and disoriented business procedures and system. Organization Development (OD) interventions would be effective in unearthing deeper issues and problems amongst these family-run enterprises in Surat.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aldrich H., Langton N. (1997). Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Life Cycles. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Ed. P. D. Reynolds, W. D. Bygrave, N. M. Carter, P. Davidsson, W. B. Gartner, C. M. Mason, and P. P. McDougall. Wellesley, MA: Babson College Center for Entrepreneurship, 349–357.

  • Astrachan, J.H., Kolenko, T.A. (1994). A neglected factor explaining family business success: Human resource practices. Family Business Review, 7(3): 251-262.

  • Barnett, T. and Kellermanns F.W. (2006) Are we family or are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(6): 837–854.

  • Cardon M.S. and Stevens C.E. (2004). Managing Human Resources in Small Organizations: What do we know?. Human Resource Management Review 14, 295–323.

  • Chrisman JJ, Chua JH and Kellermanns FW (2009) Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33(3): 739–760.

  • De Kok, J. and Ulhaner, L.M. (2001). Organization context and human resource management in the small firm. Small Business Economics, 17: 273-291.

  • Duran P, Kammerlander N, van Essen M and Zellweger T (2016) Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal 59(4): 1224–1264.

  • Gedajlovic E, Carney M, Chrisman JJ and Kellermanns FW (2012) The adolescence of family firm research taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management 38(4): 1010–1037.

  • Hauswald H, Hack A, Kellermanns FW and Patzelt H (2016) Attracting new talent to family firms: Who is attracted and under what conditions? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 40(5): 963-989.

  • Heneman, H.G.III, and Berkley, R.A. (1999). Applicant attraction practices and outcomes among small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(1): 53-74

  • Heneman, R.L., Tansky, J.W., and Camp, S.M. (2000). Human Resource Management Practices in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Unanswered Questions and Future Research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25, 1–11.

  • IFERA (2003) Family businesses dominate. Family Business Review 16(4): 235–240.

  • Kim, Y. and Gao, F.Y. (2010) An empirical study of human resource management practices in family firms in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management 21(12): 2095–2119.

  • LeBreton-Miller I and Miller D (2006) Why do some family businesses outcompete? Governance, longterm orientation, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(6): 731–746.

  • Maykut, P. & R. Morehouse (1994) Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide. London: The Falmer Press.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis, a sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Miller D, Lee J, Chang S and Le Breton-Miller I (2009) Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies 40(5): 802–817.

  • Miller D, Wright M, Le Breton-Miller I and Scholes L (2015) Resources and innovation in family businesses: The Janus-face of socioemotional preferences. California Management Review 58(4): 20–40.

  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Mouton, J. & Marais, H.C. (1990). Basic concepts in the methodology of the social sciences (Revised ed.). Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.

  • Reid, R.S., Morrow, T., Kelly, B., and McCartan, P. (2002). People Management in SMEs: An Analysis of Human Resource Strategies in Family and Non-Family Businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9(3), 245–259.

  • Songini, L. and Gnan, L. (2013). Family Involvement and Agency Cost Control Mechanisms in Family Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Journal of Small Business Management, forthcoming.

  • Upton, N., and Heck, R.K.Z. (1997). The Family Business Dimension of Entrepreneurship,” in Entrepreneurship 2000. Eds. Sexton, D.L. and Smilor, R.W. Chicago: Upstart Publishing, 243–266.

  • Wilkinson S. (1998) Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1(3), 181–203.


Journal + Issues