Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Systems for Marketing Decisions

Open access

Abstract

The activity-based costing (ABC) systems emerged as a management accounting innovation in the mid-1980s in response to dissatisfaction with traditional management accounting techniques and heightened international competition. Although ABC provides many advantages for managerial decision making, ABC tends to be outdated due to its limitations and is substituted by the time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) systems. TDABC requires estimates of only two parameters: how much it costs per time unit of capacity to supply resources to activities and how much time it takes to perform each activity. TDABC allows incorporation of variation in the time demands made by different types of processes and consequently the representation of all possible combinations of activities that a process performs. This paper uses TDABC to calculate marketing costs and describes TDABC as a useful technique to reduce marketing resource costs and to support effective marketing decision making in various contexts such as marketing processes restructuring, marketing mix choices, customer profitability and price differentiation for customer classes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Beik L. and S. Buzby (1973) “Profitability Analysis by Market Segments” Journal of Marketing pp. 48-53.

  • Brimson J. (1991) Activity Accounting: an activity-based costing approach John Wiley & Sons: New York NY.

  • Everaert P. and W. Bruggeman (2007) “Time-driven Activity-based Costing: Exploring the Underlying Model” Cost Management pp. 16-20.

  • Hoozee S. M. L. Vermeire and W. Bruggeman (2012) “The impact of refinement on the accuracy of time-driven ABC” Abacus pp. 439-472.

  • Kaplan R. and S. Anderson (2004) “Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing” Harvard Business Review pp. 131-138.

  • Kaplan R. and S. Anderson (2007) “Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: A Simpler and More Powerful Path to Higher Profits” Harvard Business School Press: Boston MA.

  • Kaplan R.S. and R. Cooper (1998) “Cost & Effect. Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance” Harvard Business School Press: Boston MA.

  • Kee R. C. (2012) “Measuring & Managing the Cost of Governmental Services: A Case for Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing” Journal of Government Financial Management pp. 38-41.

  • Lilien G. P. Kotler and K. Moorthy (1992) Marketing Models Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs NJ.

  • Minter S. (2014) “US Mexico Are ‘Rising Stars’ in Manufacturing Cost Competitiveness” Industry Week.

  • Mittal V. M. Sarkees and F. Murshed (2008) “The Right Way to Manage Unprofitable Customers” Harvard Business Review

  • Narong D. K. (2009) “Activity-based costing and management solutions to traditional shortcomings of cost accounting” Cost Engineering pp. 11-18.

  • Sidhu B. and J. H. Roberts (2008) “The marketing accounting interface – lessons and limitations” Journal of Marketing Management pp. 669-686.

  • Spedding T. A. and G. Q. Sun (1999) “Application of discrete event simulation to the activity based costing of manufacturing systems” International Journal of Production Economics pp. 289-301.

  • Wegmann G. and S. Nozile (2009) “The activity-based costing method developments: state-of-the art and case study” The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices pp. 7-22.

  • Weber J. (2002) “Managing the Marketing Budget in a Cost-Constrained Environment” Industrial Marketing Management pp. 705-717.

Search