For better or for worse, the “corporations rule the world” assertion is nowadays more actual and accurate than ever before, as multinational companies represent the undisputable engine of the globalization process, and the latter continuously (re)creates the background against which global multinationals are flourishing, while reinforcing their “domination”. Since 1995, the Fortune Global 500 ranking (FG 500) annually provides a comprehensive and eloquent image of the world of global multinationals; the merits of the FG 500 ranking go beyond the synchronic approach of the characteristics of global multinationals (in terms of revenues, profits, assets and employees - by sector, industry and country), as it also favors diachronic analysis and comparisons - which are essential for strategists in identifying evolving trends and substantiating corporate strategies able to lead to sustainable competitiveness. The paper aims to determine the contribution of sectors to FG 500 ranking in 2016, on one hand, and to emphasize on some industry-based dynamics in FG 500 - by comparatively analyzing the 2016 and 1996 rankings, on the other hand.
Godfrey. B. J. & Zhou. Y. (1999). Ranking world cities: multinational corporations and the global urban hierarchy. Urban Geography. 20(3). 268-281.
Goldin I. & Mariathasan M. (2014). The butterfly defect: How globalization creates systemic risks and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.
Gorzeń-Mitka I. & Okręglicka M. (2015). Managing Complexity: A Discussion of Current Strategies and Approaches. Procedia Economics and Finance 27 438-444.
Grant R. M. (2003). Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: Evidence from the oil majors. Strategic Management Journal 24(6) 491-517.
Kolk. A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business strategy and the environment. 12(5). 279-291.
Muller. A. & Whiteman. G. (2009). Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response: A study of Fortune Global 500 firms. Journal of Business Ethics. 84(4). 589-603.
Murray J. Y. Kotabe M. & Wildt A. R. (1995). Strategic and financial performance implications of global sourcing strategy: A contingency analysis. Journal of International Business Studies 181-202.
Peng. M. W. (2012). The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal. 2(2). 97-107.
Peterson. R. B. Sargent. J. Napier. N. K. & Shim. W. S. (1996). Corporate expatriate HRM policies internationalization and performance in the world's largest MNCs. MIR: Management International Review. 215-230.
Rugman A. M. Oh C. H. & Lim D. S. (2012). The regional and global competitiveness of multinational firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(2) 218-235.
Rugman A. M. & Brain C. (2003). Multinational enterprises are regional not global. Multinational Business Review 11(1) 3-12.
Rugman. A. & Girod. S. (2003). Retail multinationals and globalization: the evidence is regional. European Management Journal. 21(1). 24-37.
Scharl. A. Dickinger. A. & Murphy. J. (2005). Diffusion and success factors of mobile marketing. Electronic commerce research and applications. 4(2). 159-173.
Tkaczyk C. Jones S. & Donnelly G. (2016). Everything You Need to Know About the Global 500 in 6 Charts. Fortune http://fortune.com/2016/07/22/global-500-in-6-charts/.
Urry J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity.