Change, Resistance to Change and Organizational Cynicism

Blanca Grama 1  and Ramona Todericiu 2
  • 1 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania
  • 2 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania


Over the past decades, the focus of the scientists has shifted towards the area of organizational change. The concept has been approached from several perspectives and studied by numerous disciplines and refers to a shift or transformation of an organization, of several components of the organization or of the processes that lie within. Being in an environment characterized by competitiveness and complexity, organizations are under a constant need of change, of progress, while the aim of each change is to improve the aspects that make this happen. The dynamics of the labour force market has contributed to the creation of an environment in which organizations are permanently facing the need to implement various changes regarding their strategy, structure, processes or culture. Henceforth, the factors that can alter the implementation of change benefit from an increased focus. Understanding the reason for which some employees can resist change can have major financial implications for the organization. When considering the human resources involved in the change, nothing seems simple; most of the times things are not as they should be, and most of the employees experience a resistance to change, sometimes in the form of change-specific cynicism, a notion defined as the belief of employees that the organization in which they work lacks integrity. This paper represents the cultural adaptation of Change-Specific Cynicism Scale (a scale proposed by , validated on the Canadian population), to the specifics of the Romanian population and supplies a method of evaluating change-specific cynicism for the specialized literature. Statistic results have shown that the Change-Specific Cynicism Scale has a high level of internal consistency (α=0,84) and can be used exclusively for equivalent populations. Moreover, this paper aims to approach the term organizational cynicism and its role in the context of organizational change.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3).

  • Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11).

  • Bartunek, J.M., Rousseau, D.M., Rudolph, J.M. & DePalma, J.A. (2006). On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion and assessment of an organizational change initiated by others. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 182-206.

  • Beer, M. and Nohria, N.,2000, Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78, no.3, May-Jun, 133-141.

  • Budeanu, A, Pitariu, H. (2009). Relatia dintre increderea in management si atitudinile fata de schimbare in contextual unei achizitii internationale, Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 7, (1), 29-43.

  • Coch, L. şi French, J.R.P. jr., (1948), Overcoming Resistance to Change în Human Relations, nr. 2, p. 512 - 532.

  • Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review.

  • Davis, W. D., & Gardner, W. L. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 15(4).

  • Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational Cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 22, 341-352.

  • George, J.M. & Jones, G.R. (2001). Towards a process model of individual change in organizations. Human Relations, 54, 419-444.

  • Kiefer, T. (2005). Feeling bad: Antecedents consequences of negative emotions in ongoing change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 875-897.

  • Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4).

  • Rafferty, A.E. & Griffin, M.A. (2008). Organizational Change. În J. Barling & C.L. Cooper (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 1: Micro Approaches. London: Sage Publications.pp. 603-620.

  • Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11(1).

  • Stanley, D. J., Meyer, J. P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business & Psychology, 19(4).

  • Stanley, D.J., (1998), Employee Cynism About Organizational Change. Developlemt and validation of a measure. Faculty of Graduate Studies. The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, September.

  • Thompson, R., Joseph, K., Bailey, L., Worley, J., Wiliams, C., (2000), Organizational change: an assessement for trsut and cynicism. Office of Aviation Medicine Washington DC, DOT/FAA/AM-00/14

  • Waddell, D., & Sohal, A. S. (1998). Resistance: A constructive tool for change management. Management Decision, 36(8).

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group & Organization Management, 25(2).


Journal + Issues