Do CSR Practices Of Banks In Mauritius Lead To Satisfaction And Loyalty?

Open access

Abstract

This study aims to determine how CSR activities of banks in Mauritius impact on customers’ satisfaction and loyalty towards banks. A stakeholder approach to CSR and Carroll’s (1991) four part definition was adopted, which included economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic corporate social responsibilities. A three- section questionnaire was used for data collection. 384 questionnaires were distributed, out of which 352 were returned. The results indicate that philanthropic CSR, economic CSR and ethical CSR, in their order of descending importance, are significant predictors of customer satisfaction and loyalty. The study shows that legal responsibilities however did not influence customer satisfaction and loyalty. The study concludes that philanthropic, economic and ethical CSR could be areas to further investigate with a view to benefit from competitive advantage in the banking sector. The study purports to contribute to existing literature by providing evidence that Carroll’s model may not be applicable in non-western context, more particularly so, in small economies. The study also advocates future research avenues.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abd Rahim R. Jalaludin F. W. & Tajuddin K. (2011)The importance of corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour in Malaysia Asian Academy of Management Journal Vol. 16 no. 1 pp. 119-139.

  • Bhattacharya C.B. & Sen S. (2004) Doing better at doing good: when why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives California Management Review Vol. 47 No.1 pp. 9-24.

  • Carrigan M. & Attalla A. (2001) The myth of the ethical consumer - do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing Vol.18 no.7 pp. 570-74.

  • Carroll A. B. (1979) A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Review Vol.4 no.4 pp.497-505.

  • Carroll A. B. (1999) Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct Business and Society Vol.38 no. 3 pp. 268-295.

  • Carroll A. B. (1991) The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders Business Horizons Vol.34 no.4 pp.39-48.

  • Castelo Branco M. & Lima Rodriques L. (2007) Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility.

  • Chaudhuri A. & Ligas M. (2009) Consequences of value in retail markets Journal of Retailing Vol.85 no.3 pp. 406-419

  • Cronin J.J. Brady M.K. Brand R.R. Hightower R. and Shemwell D.J. (1997) A cross - sectional test of the effect and conceptualization of service value Journal of Services Marketing Vol.11 no.6 pp.375-91.

  • Cone Communications 2013. Global CSR study. Boston: Echo Research.

  • Dartey-Baah K. & Amponsah-Tawiah K. (2011) Exploring the limits of western corporate social responsibility theories in Africa International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol.2 no.18 pp.126-137.

  • Donaldson T. & Preston L. E. (1995)The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts Evidence and Implications Academy of Management Review Vol.20 no. 1 pp. 65-91.

  • Driver C. & Thompson G. (2002) Corporate governance and democracy: The stakeholder debate revisited Journal of Management and Governance Vol.6 no.2 pp.111-130.

  • Eldelman Insight 2012. Edelman Trust Barometer: U.S. Financial Services and Banking Industries.

  • Faullant R. Matzler K. & Füller J. (2008) The impact of satisfaction and image on loyalty: the case of Alpine ski resorts Managing Service Quality Vol.18 no.2 pp.163-178

  • Federation of Disabled Peoples Organisations (DPO) Mauritius 2013. Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Mauritius.

  • Field A. (2005): Discovering Statistics Using SPSS 2nd ed. Sage London.

  • Flandez R. (2013) Most Consumers Who Buy Charity-Linked Products Want Results [Online] Available at: http://philanthropy.com/article/Most-Consumers-Who-Buy/142029/

  • Freeman R. E. (1998) A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation in Pincus L. B. (Ed.) Perspectives in business ethics McGraw-Hill Singapore 171-181.

  • Garriga E. & Melé D. (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory Journal of business ethics Vol. 53 no.1-2 pp.51-71.

  • Guchait P. Anner M. & Wu L. (2011) Customer perceptions of corporate social responsibility of service firms: impact on customer attitudes and behavioral intentions.

  • Hair J. F. Jr. Black W. C. Babin B. J. & Anderson R. E. (2010): Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Ed. United States: Pearson Prentice Hall

  • Jain A.K. Pinson C. & Malhotra N.K. (2007) Customer loyalty as a construct in the marketing of banking services International Journal of Bank Marketing Vol.5 no. 3 pp. 49-72.

  • Laczniak G. R. & Murphy P. E. (2006) Normative perspectives for ethical and socially responsible marketing Journal of Macromarketing Vol.26 no.2 pp.154-177.

  • Maignan I. (2001) Consumers' perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison Journal of Business Ethics Vol.30 pp.57-72.

  • McDonald L. M. & Rundle-Thiele S (2008) Corporate social responsibility and bank customer satisfaction: a research agenda International Journal of Bank Marketing Vol.26 no.3 pp.170-182.

  • McDonald L. M. & Lai C. H. (2011) Impact of corporate social responsibility initiatives on Taiwanese banking customers International Journal of Bank Marketing Vol.29 no.1pp. 50-63.

  • McWilliams A. & Siegel D. (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective Academy of Management Review Vol.26 pp.117-127.

  • Mitchell R. K. Agle B. R. & Wood D. J. (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts Academy of management review Vol.22 no.4pp. 853-886.

  • Moir L. (2001) What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate governance Vol.1 no.2 pp.16-22.

  • Musa R. (2005) A proposed conceptual framework of satisfaction - attitudinal loyalty - behavioral loyalty chain: exploring the moderating effect of trust Paper presented at ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Relationship Marketing (Consumer).

  • Nareeman A. & Hassan Z. (2013) Customer Perceived Practice of CSR on Improving Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty International Journal of Accounting and Business Management Vol.1 no.1 pp.30-49.

  • Öberseder M. Schlegelmilch B. B. & Gruber V. (2011) Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions Journal of Business Ethics Vol.104 no.4pp. 449-460.

  • Öberseder M. Schlegelmilch B. B. & Murphy P. E. (2013) CSR practices and consumer perceptions Journal of Business Research Vol.66no.10 pp.1839-1851

  • Olson J. & Reynolds T. (1983) Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures: implications for advertising strategy in Percy L. and Woodside A. (Eds) Advertising and Consumer Psychology Lexington Books Lexington MA.

  • Onlaor W. & Rotchanakitumnuai S. (2010) Enhancing Customer Loyalty towards Corporate Social Responsibility of Thai Mobile Service Providers World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology Vol.40 pp. 41.

  • Parasuraman A. Zeithaml V.A. and Berry L.L. (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality Journal of Retailing Vol.64 no. 1 pp.12-40.

  • Poolthong Y. & Mandhachitara R. (2009) Customer expectations of CSR perceived service quality and brand effect in Thai retail banking International Journal of Bank Marketing Vol. 27 no.6 pp.408-427.

  • Porter M.E. & Kramer M.R. (2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility Harvard Business Review Vol. 84 no. 12 pp.78-9.

  • Raman M. Lim W. & Nair S. (2012) The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer loyalty. Kajian Malaysia Journal of Malaysian Studies Vol. 17 no. 1 pp. 3-12.

  • Republic of Mauritius Central Statistics Office Population and vital statistics (2013). Available from http://www.gov.mu/portal/site/cso.

  • Reverte C. (2009) Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 88 no. 2pp. 351-366.

  • Schwartz M. S. & Carroll A. B. (2003) Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain approach Business Ethics Quarterly pp.503-530.

  • Seibly G. (2013) Sterling Bank's Greg Seibly on CSR and Community Banks. American Banker 28 October.

  • Šimić M. L. & Štimac H. (2010) CSR: Croatian consumers’ response. Regulation and Best Practices in Public and Nonprofit Marketing 365.

  • Tan Y. W. & KOMARAN R. V. (2006) Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Study in Singapore; Strategic Management Policy

  • Taylor S.A. & Baker T.L. (1994) An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the information of consumers’ purchase intentions Journal of Retailing Vol.70 no. 2pp. 163-78.

  • Thuy P. N. & Le Nguyen Hau. (2010) Service personal values and customer loyalty: a study of banking services in a transitional economy International Journal of Bank Marketing Vol.28 no.6 pp.465-478.

  • United Nations Sustainable development platform Forum available at http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?menu=203 [accessed: 25 April 2014].

  • Valor C. (2005) Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: towards corporate accountability Business and Society Review Vol.110 no.2 pp.191-212.

  • Van der Laan S. (2009) The Role of Theory in Explaining Motivation for Corporate Social Disclosures: Voluntary Disclosures vs' Solicited' Disclosures Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal Journal 3 no. 4.

  • Visser W. (2005) Revisiting Carroll's CSR pyramid: An African perspective. In M. Huniche & E. R. Pedersen (Eds.) Corporate citizenship in developing countries: New partnership perspectives (pp. 29-56). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

  • Votaw D. (1972) Genius Becomes Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility Pt. I. California Management Review 15(2).

  • Wagner T. Lutz R. J. & Weitz B. A. (2009) Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions Journal of Marketing Vol.73 no. 6 pp.77-91.

  • Zeithaml V. A. (1988) Consumer perceptions of price quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence The Journal of Marketing Vol. 52 no. 2 pp.2-22.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2494 1216 104
PDF Downloads 2727 1227 97