Disputes Resolution

Open access


By „dispute” we mean an argumentative dialog where each of the two parts state opposite theses. Two sentences can be contrary if they have similar reference, but incompatible predicates (SIP – sentences with incompatible predicates). Usually, the disputes are solved using force in different ways, but that does not mean that the winner is right and his thesis is true. Therefore, we cannot evaluate a thesis on the ground of its success, but we need a reference mark for that. According to the Sophist school, the individual is the only reference mark, so any SIP is equally justified. The absolutist point of view claims that there is an objective reference mark and, consequently, the truth is, at its turn, objective and unique. Finally, the relativist orientation rejects any objective reference mark, but the right thesis is not arbitrary, as the sophists thought, it is true relatively to the state of the evaluator to a given moment. It follows that, for any evaluator, at a moment of time, only one SIP is true.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Born Max Einstein’s Theory of Relativity E. P. Dutton & Co. New York 1922

  • Dobre Marius Discurs publicitar retorică logică Trei București 2017

  • Dumitriu Anton Istoria logicii Ed. Didactică și Pedagogică București 1975

  • Lodder Arno R. DiaLaw Springer Dordrecht 1999

  • Mittelstaedt Peter Quantum Logic Reidel Dordrecht 1978

  • Russell Bertrand Istoria filosofiei occidentale I Humanitas București 2005

  • Russell Bertrand Istoria filosofiei occidentale II Humanitas București 2005

  • Russell Bertrand ABC of Relativity Signet London 1959

  • Walton Douglas Benjamins John Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation John Benjamins Amsterdam 2007

  • https://archive.org/details/einsteinstheoryo00born/page/n4

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 40 40 4
PDF Downloads 53 53 10