Systematic Analysis of the Current Academic Research on Social Media Marketing

Open access

Abstract

With the advent of social media where customers have the technical ability to upload own content the change occurred in some of the communication habits online. This world of constant communication is a challenge for businesses as well researchers. Academic research in this area is bringing valuable insights into people attitudes and behaviour on the social media. What is the current situation and where the research field is heading is a question of high importance. This study uses the systematic approach to reviewing the literature and to show the development of publications produced at Czech universities. Although the results show an increasing number of studies, Czech research is lagging behind other similar countries. Compared with the best countries, it is lagging behind in the number of quotations per article. On the basis of these analyses, suggestions for future research that can help to promote future theory development are proposed.

References

  • Anderson, N., Herriot, P., and Hodgkinson, G. P., 2001. The practitioner-researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 391-411. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317901167451

  • Baumgartner, H., and Pieters, R., 2003. The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and Its Subareas Over Time. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 123-139. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.123.18610

  • Becan, M., and Smutny, Z., 2016. The Use of Enterprise Social Networks in Organizations from the Perspective of Generation Y in the Czech Republic. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 63(1).

  • Bryman, A., and Bell, E., 2007. Business research methods. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Chen, C. Y., Jim Wu, Y. C., and Wu, W. H., 2013. A sustainable collaborative research dialogue between practitioners and academics. Management Decision, 51(3), 566-593. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741311309661

  • Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., and Haynes, R. B., 1997. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376-380. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006

  • Counsell, C., 1997. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(5), 380-387. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-5-199709010-00008

  • de Vries, L., Gensler, S., and Leeflang, P. S. H., 2012. Popularity of Brand Posts on Brand Fan Pages: An Investigation of the Effects of Social Media Marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003

  • Denyer, D., and Tranfield, D., 2009. Producing a Systematic Review The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671-689). Los Angeles: SAGE.

  • Duncan, T., and Moriarty, S. E., 1998. A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 1-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252157

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Hofacker, C. F., and Bloching, B., 2013. Marketing the Pinball Way: Understanding How Social Media Change the Generation of Value for Consumers and Companies. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 237-241. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.005

  • Hult, G. T. M., Neese, W. T., and Bashaw, R. E., 1997. Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 37-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027347539701900105

  • Kaplan, A. M., and Haenlein, M., 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

  • Killian, G., and McManus, K., 2015. A marketing communications approach for the digital era: Managerial guidelines for social media integration. Business Horizons, 58(5), 539-549. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.05.006

  • Kozinets, R. V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., and Wilner, S. J., 2010. Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71-89. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.2.71

  • MacIntosh, R., Beech, N., Bartunek, J., Mason, K., Cooke, B., and Denyer, D., 2017. Impact and Management Research: Exploring Relationships between Temporality, Dialogue, Reflexivity and Praxis. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 3-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12207

  • Mangold, W. G., and Faulds, D. J., 2009. Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-365. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002

  • McKelvey, B., 2006. Van de Ven and Johnson's “Engaged Scholarship”: Nice Try, But…. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 822–829. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527451

  • Moriarty, S. E., Mitchell, N., and Wells, W. D., 2011. Advertising & IMC: Principles and Practice (9th ed. ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.

  • Nguyen, B., and Mutum, D. S., 2012. A review of customer relationship management: Successes, advances, pitfalls and futures. Business Process Management Journal, 18(3), 400-419. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151211232614

  • Petticrew, M., 2001. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: Myths and misconceptions. British Medical Journal, 322(7278), 98-101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7278.98

  • Pierce, B., and Garven, G., 1995. Publishing International Business Research: A Survey of Leading Journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 69-89. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490166

  • Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., and Daft, R. L., 2001. Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340-355. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069460

  • Saunders, M., Thornhill, A., and Lewis, P., 2009. Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed. ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., and Smart, P., 2003. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

  • Tranfield, D., and Starkey, K., 1998. The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy. British Journal of Management, 9(4), 341-353. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00103

  • Van De Ven, A. H., and Johnson, P. E., 2006. Knowledge for Theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527385

  • Yadav, M. S., and Pavlou, P. A., 2014. Marketing in computer-mediated environments: Research synthesis and new directions. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 20-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jm.12.0020

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 81 81 51
PDF Downloads 34 34 22