In this paper, an attempt is made to assessment and comparison of bootstrap experiment and Monte Carlo experiment for stock price simulation. Since the stock price evolution in the future is extremely important for the investors, there is the attempt to find the best method how to determine the future stock price of BNP Paribas′ bank. The aim of the paper is define the value of the European and Asian option on BNP Paribas′ stock at the maturity date. There are employed four different methods for the simulation. First method is bootstrap experiment with homoscedastic error term, second method is blocked bootstrap experiment with heteroscedastic error term, third method is Monte Carlo simulation with heteroscedastic error term and the last method is Monte Carlo simulation with homoscedastic error term. In the last method there is necessary to model the volatility using econometric GARCH model. The main purpose of the paper is to compare the mentioned methods and select the most reliable. The difference between classical European option and exotic Asian option based on the experiment results is the next aim of tis paper.
Andersen, T., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., and Vega, C., 2006. Real-time price discovery in global stock, bond and foreign exchange markets. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
Bank for International Settlements, 2015. OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2015 Statistical release. http://www.bis.org/publ/otc_hy1511.pdf.
BNP Paribas, 2016. How the bank is driving change. 2015 Annual Report, 63. https://group.bnpparibas/uploads/file/bnpp_ra_2015_en.pdf.
Bohdalová, M., 2006. Statistical Methods in Financial Services. (Dissertation Thesis), Comenius University, Bratislava.
Bohdalová, M., and Greguš, M., 2011. The identification of key market risk factors for a portfolio of EU bonds. Global business and economics anthology, 2(2), 470-477.
Bohdalová, M., and Greguš, M., 2012. Stochastic Analysis of the Financial Markets. Bratislava: Comenius University Press.
Bohdalová, M., and Šlahor, Ľ., 2008. Simulations of the correlated financial risk factors. Journal of Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Informatics, 4(1), 89-97.
Campbell, S. D., and Diebold, F. X., 2005. Stock returns and expected business conditions: Half a century of direct evidence. http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~fdiebold/papers/paper70/cd3a.pdf.
Daly, K., Nielsen, A. E. B., and Oppenheimer, P., 2010. Finding fair value in global equities: Part II - Forecasting returns. Journal of Portfolio Management. http://www.iijournals.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3905/jpm.2010.36.3.056.
Financeyahoo, 2017. California. 2017. from http://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BNP.F/history?period1=946681200&period2=1485730800&interval=1d&filter=history&frequency=1d
Franke, J., Härdle, W. K., and Hafner, C. M., 2008. Statistics of Financial Markets. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. doi:
Lettau, M., and Ludvigson, S., 2001. Consumption, aggregate wealth, and expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, LVI(3), 815-849.
Nnorges Bank Investment Management, 2012a. Economic Growth and Equity Returns. NBIM Discussion Note, 5. https://www.nbim.no/globalassets/documents/dicussionpaper/2012/discussionnote_5-12_final.pdf.
Nnorges Bank Investment Management, 2012b. Time-varying expected returns and investor heterogeneity: foundations for rebalancing. NBIM Discussion Note, 1. www.nbim.no/globalassets/documents/dicussion-paper/2012/discussionnote_1-12_v4.pdf.
Proksová, D., and Bohdalová, M., 2015. Bond yield spreads in the Eurozone. Analele ştiinţifice ale Universităţii "Al.I. Cuza" din Iaşi. Ştiinţe economice / Scientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi. Economic Sciences, 62(2), 221-239. doi:
Verbeek, M., 2008. A Guide to Modern Econometrics (3rd ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Wallick, D. W., Shanahan, J., Tasopoulos, C., and Yoon, J., 2012. The global case for strategic asset allocation. Vanguard research paper. https://institutional.vanguard.com/iam/pdf/VIPS_global_case.pdf.