Efficiency of Pay for Performance Programs in Romanian Companies and the Mediating Role of Organizational Justice


The present research examined the influences of pay for performance programs on employee performance in the Romanian context, by comparing a sample of employees in companies in which such programs are implemented to a sample of employees in organizations in which performance is not used as a criterion in deciding financial rewards. Results show that the work performances of the former, as evaluated by the direct supervisors of each employee, are significantly higher than those of the latter, and that this effect of performance pay is partly mediated by its positive effects on employee perceptions of distributive and procedural justice. Furthermore, results indicate that the individual – level financial incentive systems are more efficient in fostering work performance than the team – level performance pay programs in the Romanian employee sample, and that they also have stronger effects on the two dimensions of organizational justice.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adams, J. S., 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.

  • Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M., 1987. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organization behavior. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 177-198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01048015

  • Armstrong, M., and Murlis, H., 2004. Reward Management: A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy and Practice. London: Kogan Page.

  • Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y., 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

  • Beer, M., Cannon, M. D., Baron, J. N., Dailey, P. R., Gerhart, B., Heneman, H. G., . . . Locke, E. A., 2004. Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 3-48. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20001

  • Brashear, T., Brooks, C., and Boles, J., 2004. Distributive and procedural justice in a sales force context: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 57(1), 86-93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00288-6

  • Byrne, B. M., 2001. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS - Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Cadsby, C. B., Song, F., and Tapon, F., 2007. Sorting and incentive effects of pay-for performance: An experimental investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 387-405. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634448

  • Cahuc, P., and Dormont, B., 1997. Profit sharing: Does it increase productivity and employment? A theoretical model and empirical evidence on French micro data. Labour Economics, 4(3), 293-319. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(97)00008-0

  • Chan, S., and Jepsen, D., 2011. Workplace Relationships, Attitudes, and Organizational Justice: A Hospitality Shift Worker Contextual Perspective. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 10(2), 150-168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2011.536939

  • Chiang, F. F. T., and Birtch, T. A., 2006. An empirical examination or reward preferences within and across national settings. Management International Review, 46(5), 573-596. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11575-006-0116-4

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., and Spector, P. E., 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A metaanalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., and Ng, K. Y., 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425

  • Cropanzano, R., and Rupp, D. E., 2003. An overview of organizational justice: Implications for work motivation. In L. W. Porter, G. Bigley and R. M. Steers (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (7 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

  • Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M., 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Premium. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

  • DeConinck, J. B., and Stilwell, C. D., 2004. Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57(3), 225-231. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00289-8

  • Della Torre, E., Giangreco, A., and Maes, J., 2014. Show Me the Money! Pay Structure and Individual Performance in Golden Teams. European Management Review, 11(1), 85-100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emre.12025

  • Downes, P. E., and Choi, D., 2014. Employee reactions to pay dispersion: A typology of existing research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 53-66. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.009

  • Engellandt, A., and Riphahn, R. T., 2011. Evidence on incentive effects of subjective performance evaluations. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 64(2), 241-257. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001979391106400202

  • Fischer, R., and Smith, P., 2003. Reward allocation and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(3), 251-268. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022103034003001

  • Gagne, M., and Deci, E. L., 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.322

  • Gerhart, B., and Fang, M., 2014. Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.010

  • Gerhart, B., and Milkovich, G. T., 1992. Employee compensation: Research and practice. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2 ed., pp. 481-569). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

  • Gerhart, B., and Rynes, S. L., 2003. Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Gibson, V. M., 1995. The new employee reward system. Management Review, 84(2), 13-18.

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Berrone, P., and Franco-Santos, M., 2010. Compensation and organizational performance. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.

  • Gupta, N., and Shaw, J. D., 2014. Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 1-4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.007

  • Guzzo, R. A., Jette, R. D., and Katzell, R. A., 1985. The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on worker productivity: A metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 38(2), 275-291. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00547.x

  • Hein, K., 1996. Raises fail, but incentives save the day. 170, 11.

  • Heneman, R. L., Ledford, G. E. J., and Gresham, M. T., 2000. The changing nature of work and its effect on compensation design and delivery. In S. L. Rynesand and B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensations in organizations (pp. 195-240). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Herzberg, F., 1968. One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53-62.

  • Hofstede, G., 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Judge, T., and Erez, A., 2007. Interaction and intersection: The constellation of emotional stability and extraversion in predicting performance. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 573-596. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00084.x

  • Kidwell, R. E., and Bennett, N., 1993. Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18, 429-456.

  • Kohn, A., 1993. Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 54.

  • Kwon, S., Kim, M., Kang, S., and Kim, M., 2008. Employee Reactions to Gainsharing under Seniority Pay Systems: The Mediating Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice. Human Resource Management, 47(4), 757-775. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20243

  • Ladebo, O., Oyekale, C., and Olaoye, O., 2005. Relative Contributions of Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Justice to Extension Personnel's Job Satisfaction. 12(1), 65-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2005.12107

  • Lazear, E., 2000. Performance pay and productivity. The American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346-1361. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1346

  • Leventhal, G. S., 1976. Fairness in social relationship. In Thibaut J.W., J. T. Spence and R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211-239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

  • Locke, E. A., Feren, D. B., McCaleb, V. M., Shaw, K. N., and Denny, A. T., 1980. The relative effectiveness of four methods of motivating employee performance. In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruenberg and D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in working life (pp. 363-388). New York: Wiley.

  • Lum, L., Kervin, J., Clark, K., Reid, F., and Sirola, W., 1998. Explaining nursing turnover intent: Job satisfaction, pay satisfaction, or organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 305-320. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<305::AID-JOB843>3.0.CO;2-N

  • Mafini, C., 2015. Investigating antecedent factors to job performance: Contemporary evidence from government supply management professionals. 15(1), 1-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ac.v15i1.287

  • Marsden, D., French, S., and Kubo, K., 2001. Does performance pay de-motivate, and does it matter? Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper, 660. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/3637/.

  • Marsden, D., and Richardson, R., 1994. Performing for Pay? The Effects of ‘Merit Pay’ on Motivation in a Public Service. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(2), 243-261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1994.tb01043.x

  • Mattson, M., Torbiorn, I., and Hellgren, J., 2014. Effects of staff bonus systems on safety behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 17-30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.012

  • Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., and Gerhart, B., 2013. Compensation (11th ed. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

  • Origo, F., 2009. Flexible pay, firm performance and the role of unions. New evidence from Italy. Labour Economics, 16(1), 64-78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2008.05.001

  • Pfeffer, J., 1998. The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Pinder, C. C., 2008. Work motivation in organizational behaviour (2nd ed. ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

  • Roth, L., 2006. Because I'm worth it? Understanding Inequality in a Performance-Based Pay System. Sociological Inquiry, 76(1), 116-139. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2006.00146.x

  • Rynes, S. L., 1987. Compensation strategies for recruiting. Topics in Total Compensation, 2, 185-196.

  • Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., and Parks, L., 2005. Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 571-600. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070254

  • Shaw, J. D., and Gupta, N., 2007. Pay system characteristics and quit patterns of good, average, and poor performers. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 903-928. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00095.x

  • Shaw, J. D., Gupta, N., and Delery, J., 2002. Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 491-512. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.235

  • Sweeney, P. D., 1990. Distributive justice and pay satisfaction: Field test of an equity theory prediction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4(3), 329-341. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01125243

  • Tekleab, A., Bartol, K., and Liu, W., 2005. Is it pay levels or pay raises that matter to fairness and turnover? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(8), 899-921. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.352

  • Trevor, C. O., Reilly, G., and Gerhart, B., 2012. Reconsidering pay dispersion's effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 585-610. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.0127

  • Vroom, V. H., 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

  • Wallace, C., Edwards, B., Arnold, T., Frazier, L., and Finch, D., 2009. Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 254-262. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013090

  • Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., and Erez, A., 1998. The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540-555. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256941

  • Wright, P. M., George, J. M., Farnsworth, R., and McMahan, G. C., 1993. Productivity and extra-role behavior: The effects of goals and incentives on spontaneous helping. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 374-381. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.374

  • Zhang, X., and Venkatesh, V., 2013. Explaining employee job performance: The role of online and offline workplace communication networks. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(3), 695-722.


Journal + Issues