Purpose: The present study investigated the main literature on the subject of methods and policies for reducing the electricity demand of domestic consumers, in order to identify the place of behavioral tools. Methodology: We used secondary sources, performing a literature review, together with analysis and synthesis. Findings: Policy makers prefer to use tools offered by neoclassical economics, such as various forms of taxation, fines and financial incentives in order to make domestic electricity consumers save electricity, on the assumption that consumers will make rational decisions while maximizing their personal benefit. However, studies conducted in recent years in the field of behavioral economics, which are based on the assumption that consumers’ decisions are not rational and are affected by cognitive biases, showed that the use of behavioral tools, such as detailed online information (feedback),social comparison information, information on varying rates (dynamic pricing) and general information (advertising campaign), are tools that are not less appropriate than the ones the neoclassical economics offers, mainly because electricity is an invisible product and consumers are unable to assess it by normal cognitive measures. Using an interdisciplinary combination of behavioral tools that come from a variety of approaches taken from a wide variety of different academic fields, it is possible to receive efficient results in the endeavor of reducing electricity demand. Implications: Although the neoclassical economics still remains the fundamental theory used by policymakers, it is recommended to consider behavioral economics as a complementary approach to the neoclassical economics, and combine behavioral tools in the policymakers’ toolbox, especially when those tools do not require a significant financial investment, thus efficiently maximizing the reduction of electricity demand among domestic consumers. These theoretical results will be used for designing future empirical researches on the efficiency of behavioral tools in changing the pattern of electricity consumers’ behavior.
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., and Rothengatter, T., 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002)| false
Andrey E. and Morelli J. 2010. Design of a smart meter techno-economic model for electric utilities in Ontario. Paper presented at the Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC) Halifax NS Canada.
Ariely D. 2008. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. New York USA: HarperCollins.
Benders R. M. J. Kok R. Moll H. C. Wiersma G. and Noorman K. J. 2006. New approaches for household energy conservation-In search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy 34(18) 3612-3622. doi:
Benders, R. M. J., Kok, R., Moll, H. C., Wiersma, G., and Noorman, K. J., 2006. New approaches for household energy conservation-In search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3612-3622. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.005)| false
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., and Reno, R. R., 1991. A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5)| false
Cialdini R. B. Reno R. R. and Kallgren C. A. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(6) 1015-1026. doi:
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., and Kallgren, C. A., 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.525)| false
Creyts J. Derkach A. Farese P. Nyquist S. and Ostrowski K. 2009. Unlocking energy efficiency in the US economy. United Kingdom: McKinsey Global Energy and Materials.
Darby S. 2006. The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption - A Review for Defra of the Literature on Metering Billing and Direct Displays. United Kingdom: Environmental Change Institute Oxford University.
Darby S. 2010. Literature reviews for the Energy Demand Research Project. London UK: Ofgem.
De Martino B. Kumaran D. Seymour B. and Dolan R. J. 2006. Frames biases and rational decision- making in the human brain. Science 313(5787) 684-687. doi:
De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., and Dolan, R. J., 2006. Frames, biases, and rational decision- making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684-687. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1128356)| false
Dulleck, U., and Kaufmann, S., 2004. Do customer information programs reduce household electricity demand? The Irish program. Energy Policy, 32(8), 1025-1032. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00060-0)| false
Ehrhardt-Martinez K. Donnelly K. A. and Laitner J. A. 2010. Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Washington USA: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
European Environment Agency 2012. Final electricity consumption by sector - ENER 018. Data and maps. from http://www.eea.europa.eu
Fan S. and Hyndman R. 2011. The Price Elasticity of Electricity Demand in South Australia. Energy Policy 39(6) 3709-3719. doi:
Gardner G. T. and Stern P. C. 2002. Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd ed. ed.). Boston MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Geller E. S. 2002. The challenge of increasing proenvironmental behavior. In R. B. Bechtel and A. Churchman (Eds.) Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 525-540). New York: Wiley.
Geva A. 1994. Consumer behavior purchasing decisions. Tel-Aviv Israel: The Open University.
Gilbert D. T. Pinel E. C. Wilson T. D. Blumberg S. J. and Wheatley T. P. 1998. Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(3) 617-638.
Goldman C. A. Barbose G. L. and Eto J. H. 2002. California Customer Load Reductions during the Electricity Crisis: Did They Help to Keep the Lights On? Journal of Industry Competition and Trade 2(1) 113-142. doi:
Goldman, C. A., Barbose, G. L., and Eto, J. H., 2002. California Customer Load Reductions during the Electricity Crisis: Did They Help to Keep the Lights On? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2(1), 113-142. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1020883005951)| false
King, P., 2009. ThalerRichard H. and SunsteinCass R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Yale. £18, pp. 293, hbk. Journal of Social Policy, 38(4), 726-727. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279409990158)| false
Labandeira, X., Labeaga, J. M., and Lopez-Otero, X., 2012. Estimation of elasticity price of electricity with incomplete information. Energy Economics, 34(3), 627-633. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.008)| false
Lee, L., Amir, O., and Ariely, D., 2009. In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 173-187. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/597160)| false
Logenthiran, T., Srinivasan, D., and Shun, T. Z., 2012. Demand side management in smart grid using heuristic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(3), 1244-1252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2012.2195686)| false
Lusardi A. Keller P. A. and Keller A. M. 2009. New ways to make people save: a social marketing approach. In A. Lusardi (Ed.) Overcoming the saving slump: how to improve the effectiveness of financial education and saving programs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:
Lusardi, A., Keller, P. A., and Keller, A. M., 2009. New ways to make people save: a social marketing approach. In A. Lusardi (Ed.), Overcoming the saving slump: how to improve the effectiveness of financial education and saving programs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226497105.003.0008)| false
Lutzenhiser L. Gossard M. H. and Bender S. 2002. Crisis in Paradise: Understanding Household Conservation Response to California's 2001 Energy Crisis. Paper presented at the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (published in Proceedings).
Mack B. and Hallmann S. 2004. Strom sparen in Lummerlund--eine Interventionsstudie in einer Passiv- und Niedrigenergiehaussiedlung. [Conserving electricity in Lummerlund. An intervention study in a passive and low energy house residential area]. Umweltpsychologie 8(1) 12-29.
MacLellan D. 2008. NSTAR Power Cost Monitor Pilot. Paper presented at the Behavior Energy & Climate Change Conference Sacramento.
Ministry of national infrastructures. energy and water resources 2010. National energy efficiency program. from http://energy.gov.il/GxmsMniPublications/energy.pdf
Ministry of national infrastructures. energy and water resources 2012. Press conference on electricity saving from http://energy.gov.il/AboutTheOffice/SpeakerMessages/Pages/GxmsMniSpokesmanElectricityBazoret12.aspx
Mizobuchi K. and Takeuchi K. 2012. The Influences of Economic and Psychological Factors on Energy- Saving Behavior: A Field Experiment in Matsuyama Japan http://www.econ.kobeu.ac.jp/RePEc/koe/wpaper/2012/1206.pdf.
Mohsenian-Rad A. H. Wong V. W. Jatskevich J. Schober R. and Leon-Garcia A. 2010.v Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 1(3) 320-331.
Moshari A. Yousefi G. R. Ebrahimi A. and Haghbin S. 2010. Demand-side behavior in the smart grid environment. Paper presented at the Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Chalmers Lindholmen Gothenburg Sweden.
Mountain D. 2006. The Impact of Real-Time Feedback on Residential Electricity Consumption: The Hydro One Pilot. Ontario: Mountain Economic Consulting and Associates Inc.
Newell R. G. and Siikamaki J. 2013. Nudging Energy Efficiency Behavior: The Role of Information Labels. NBER Working Paper Series 19224(july) 41. doi:
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., and Vlek, C., 2004. Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental BehaviorA Study into Household Energy Use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70-93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466)| false
Ratner R. K. Soman D. Zauberman G. Ariely D. Carmon Z. Keller P. A. and Kim B. K. 2008. How behavioral decision research can enhance consumer welfare: From freedom of choice to paternalistic intervention. Marketing Letters 19(3-4) 383-397. doi:
Ratner, R. K., Soman, D., Zauberman, G., Ariely, D., Carmon, Z., Keller, P. A., and Kim, B. K., 2008. How behavioral decision research can enhance consumer welfare: From freedom of choice to paternalistic intervention. Marketing Letters, 19(3-4), 383-397. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9044-3)| false
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., and Griskevicius, V., 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429-434. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x )| false
U.S. Department of Energy [DOE] 2006. Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them. A report to the United States Congress Pursuant to Section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. from https://energy.gov/oe/downloads/benefitsdemand-response-electricity-markets-and-recommendations-achieving-them-report
Van Dam S. S. Bakker C. A. and Van Hal J. D. M. 2010. Home energy monitors: Impact over the medium-term. Building Research and Information 38(5) 458-469. doi:
Van Dam, S. S., Bakker, C. A., and Van Hal, J. D. M., 2010. Home energy monitors: Impact over the medium-term. Building Research and Information, 38(5), 458-469. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2010.494832)| false
Winett R. A. Love S. Q. and Kidd C. 1982. The Effectiveness of An Energy Specialist and Extension Agents in Promoting Summer Energy Conservation by Home Visits. Journal of Environmental Systems 12(1) 61-70. doi:
Winett, R. A., Love, S. Q., and Kidd, C., 1982. The Effectiveness of An Energy Specialist and Extension Agents in Promoting Summer Energy Conservation by Home Visits. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12(1), 61-70. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/B4DN-N9H8-A57Y-2JDG )| false