Potential Consequences of DGAT2 and BTN Genes Polymorphism in Iraqi Holstein Cattle

Mohammed Baqur S. Al-Shuhaib 1 , Rawan A. Al-Fihan 1 , Ali A. Al-Qutbi 2 , and Tahreer M. Al-Thuwaini 1
  • 1 Al-Qasim Green University, College of Agriculture, Department of Animal Production, Babil, Iraq
  • 2 Al-Qasim Green University, College of Food Science, Department of Food Science and Technology, Babil, Iraq

Abstract

This study was conducted to describe the genetic polymorphism within the bovine diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 (DGAT2) gene and 5′-UTR of butyrophilin (BTN) gene by several in vitro tools, as well as to predict their consequences using several in silico tools. After withdrawing blood, extracting DNA, and designing specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers, single-stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and PCR experiments were performed. Each different SSCP set was sequenced and analyzed. Two genotypes were detected with two alleles. Concerning DGAT2, the AA genotype was the most common, and seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found in the AB genotype while four SNPs were found in the AA genotype. The only coding SNP (p.Ala7Val) was found in the AB genotype. Concerning BTN, the AB genotype was the most common, and twenty-two novel SNPs were detected in the AB genotype, while six SNPs were observed in the AA genotype. The effect of the observed coding and noncoding SNPs was computationally analyzed. It was shown that the coding SNP, p.Ala7Val, was predicted to have functional consequences on the DGAT2 protein structure and function. Several outcomes were deduced from several noncoding SNPs in both genetic fragments studied. This study determines the pattern of polymorphism within the DGAT2 and BTN genes to conceive their consequences within Holstein breed.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Al-Shuhaib MBSA (2017): A universal, rapid, and inexpensive method for genomic DNA isolation from the whole blood of mammals and birds. Journal of Genetics, 96, 171–176. doi: 10.1007/s12041-017-0750-6.

  • An XP, Song SG, Hou JX, Zhu CM, Peng JX, Liu XQ, Liu HY, Xiao WP, Zhao HP, Bai L, Wang JG, Song BY, Cao BY (2011): Polymorphism identification in goat DGAT2 gene and association analysis with milk yield and fat percentage. Small Ruminant Research, 100, 107–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.05.017

  • Bahrami A, Behzadi Sh, Miraei-Ashtiani SR, Roh SG, Katoh K (2013): Genetic polymorphisms and protein structures in growth hormone, growth hormone receptor, ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 1 and leptin in Mehraban sheep. Gene, 527, 397–404. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.05.066

  • Berman A (2011): Invited review: Are adaptations present to support dairy cattle productivity in warm climates? Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 2147–2158. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010–3962.

  • Bhattacharya TK, Misra SS, Feroz DS, Shukla S, Kumar P, Sharma A (2006): Effect of butyrophilin gene polymorphism on milk quality traits in crossbred cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 19, 922–926. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2006.922.

  • Bhattacharya TK, Sheikh FD, Shukla S, Kumar P, Sharma A (2007): Differences of ovine butyrophilin gene (exon 8) from its bovine and bubaline counterpart. Small Ruminant Research, 69, 198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.12.006.

  • Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R (2005): I-Mutant 2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Research, 33, 306–310. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki375.

  • Cases S, Stone SJ, Zhou P, Yen E, Tow B, Lardizabal KD, Voelker T, Farese RV (2001): Cloning of DGAT2, a second mammalian diacylglycerol acyltransferase, and related family members. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 38870–38876. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106219200.

  • Cheunsuk S, Sarataphan N, Kengwikum K (2010): Genotypic effect of butyrophilin gene on milk fat in Thai-Holstein dairy cow. Journal of Biotechnology in Living Production, 5, 22–31. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2550.

  • Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP (2012): Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLOS ONE, 7, e46688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046688.

  • Coleman RA, Lewin TM, Muoio DM (2000): Physiological and nutritional regulation of enzymes of triacylglycerol synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition, 20, 77–103. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.20.1.77.

  • de Alencar SA, Lopes JCD (2010): A comprehensive in silico analysis of the functional and structural impact of SNPs in the IGF1R gene. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2010, Article ID 715139. doi: 10.1155/2010/715139.

  • Farré D, Roset R, Huerta M, Adsuara JE, Roselló L, Albà MM, Messeguer X (2003): Identification of patterns in biological sequences at the ALGGEN server: PROMO and MALGEN. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 3651–3653. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg605

  • Felius M, Theunissen B, Lenstra A (2015): Conservation of cattle genetic resources: the role of breeds. Journal of Agricultural Science, 153, 152–162. doi: 10.1017/S0021859614000124.

  • Gasser RB, Hu M, Chilton NB, Campbell BE, Jex AJ, Otranto D, Cafarchia C, Beveridge I, Zhu X (2006): Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) for the analysis of genetic variation. Nature Protocols, 1, 3121–3128. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.485.

  • Grillo G, Turi A, Licciulli F, Mignone F, Liuni S, Banfi S, Gennarino VA, Horner DS, Pavesi G, Picardi E, Pesole G (2010): UTRdb and UTRsite (RELEASE 2010): a collection of sequences and regulatory motifs of the untranslated region of eukaryotic mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research (Database issue), 38, D75–D80. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp902.

  • Grisart B, Farnir F, Karim L, Cambisano N, Kim JJ, Kvasz A, Mni M, Simon P, Frere JM, Coppieters W, Georges M (2004): Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the DGAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 2398–2403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308518100.

  • Gupta N, Pandey A, Malik G, Gupta SC (2009): Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in growth hormone gene of Jakhrana, a prominent milk goat breed in India. Small Ruminant Research, 81, 35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.11.001.

  • Hammami H, Rekik B, Gengler N (2009): Genotype by environment interaction in dairy cattle. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 13, 155–164.

  • Heid HW, Keenan TW (2005): Intracellular origin and secretion of MFG. European Journal of Cell Biology, 84, 245–258. doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-4-7.

  • Hradecká E, Čítek J, Panicke L, Řehout V, Hanusová L (2008): The relation of GH1, GHR and DGAT1 polymorphisms with estimated breeding values for milk production traits of German Holstein sires. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 238–245.

  • Kale DS, Yadav BR, Mukherjee A, Prasad J (2013): Single strand conformation polymorphism within butyrophilin gene and its relationship with milk yield in Indian River buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin, 32, 253–259.

  • Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE (2015): The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nature Protocols, 10, 845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053.

  • Komisarek J, Waskowicz K, Dorynek Z (2006): Analysis of the relationship between two single nucleotide polymorphisms of the butyrophilin (BTN1A1) gene and milk production traits in Jersey cattle. Annals of Animal Science, 6, 45–52.

  • Kuhn C, Thaller G, Winter A, Bininda-Emonds ORP (2004): Evidence for multiple alleles at the DGAT1 locus better explains a quantitative trait locus with major effect on milk fat content in cattle. Genetics, 167, 1873–1881. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.022749.

  • Liao PY, Lee KH (2010): From SNPs to functional polymorphism: the insight into biotechnology applications. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 49, 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2009.12.021.

  • Masoodi TA, Talluri VR, Shaik NA, Al-Aama JY, Hasan Q (2012): Functional genomics based prioritization of potential nsSNPs in EPHX1, GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genes for breast cancer susceptibility studies. Genomics, 99, 330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.04.006.

  • Mather IH, Jack LJW (1993): A review of the molecular and cellular biology of butyrophilin, the major protein of bovine milk-fat globule membrane. Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 3832–3850. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77726-7.

  • Ng PC, Henikoff S (2006): Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 7, 61–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115630.

  • Ogg SL, Weldon AK, Dobbie L, Smith AJ, Mather IH (2004): Expression of butyrophilin (Btn1a1) in lactating mammary gland is essential for the regulated secretion of milk-lipid droplets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 10084–10089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402930101.

  • Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T (1989): Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 86, 2766–2770.

  • Patel SM, Koringa PG, Reddy BB, Nathani NM, Joshi CG (2015): In silico analysis of consequences of non-synonymous SNPs of Slc11a2 gene in Indian bovines. Genomics Data, 5, 72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.05.015.

  • Pauline CN, Steven H (2003): SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 3812–3814. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg509.

  • Robenek H, Hofnagel O, Buers I, Lorkowski S, Schnoor M, Robenek MJ, Heid H, Troyer D, Severs NJ (2006): Butyrophilin controls milk fat globule secretion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 10385–10390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600795103.

  • Sandelin A, Wasserman WW (2005): Prediction of nuclear hormone receptor response elements. Molecular Endocrinology, 19, 595–606. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0101.

  • Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K, Ward M, Sherry ST (2000): dbSNP: a database of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 52355.

  • Spelman R, Georges M, Snell R (2002): Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Research, 12, 222–231. doi: 10.1101/gr.224202.

  • Tang H, Thomas PD (2016): PANTHER-PSEP: predicting disease-causing genetic variants using position-specific evolutionary preservation. Bioinformatics, 32, 2230–2232. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw222.

  • Thaller G, Kramer W, Winter A, Kaupe B, Erhardt G, Fries R (2003): Effects of DGAT1 variants on milk production traits in German cattle breeds. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 1911–1918. doi: 10.2527/2003.8181911x.

  • Wakimoto K, Chiba H, Michibata H, Seishima M, Kawasaki S, Okubo K, Mitsui H, Torii H, Imai Y (2003): A novel diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT2) is decreased in human psoriatic skin and increased in diabetic mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 310, 296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.015.

  • Winter A, Kramer W, Werner FA, Kollers S, Kata S, Durstewitz G, Buitkamp J, Womack JE, Thaller G, Fries R (2002): Association of a lysine-232/alanine polymorphism in a bovine gene encoding acyl-CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT1) with variation at a quantitative trait locus for milk fat content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9300–9305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142293799.

  • Winter A, Eckeveld Van M, Bininda Emonds ORP, Habermann FA, Fries R (2003): Genomic organization of the DGAT2/MOGAT gene family in cattle (Bos taurus) and other mammals. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 102, 42–47. doi: 10.1159/000075723.

  • Yadav P, Chatterjee A, Bhattacharjee A (2014): Identification of deleterious nsSNPs in α, μ, π and θ class of GST family and their influence on protein structure. Genomics Data, 2, 66–72.

  • Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T (1999): POPGENE Version 1.31. Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. University of Alberta, Edmonton.

  • Yen CE, Stone SJ, Koliwad S, Harris C, Robert V, Farese Jr RV (2008): DGAT enzymes and triacylglycerol biosynthesis. Journal of Lipid Research, 49, 2283–301. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800018-JLR200.

  • Zenger KR, Khatkar MS, Cavanagh JA, Hawken RJ, Raadsma HW (2006): Genome-wide genetic diversity of Holstein Friesian cattle reveals new insights into Australian and global population variability, including impact of selection. Animal Genetics, 38, 7–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01543.x.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search