Repellence and attraction of Apis mellifera foragers by nectar alkaloids

Open access

Abstract

Plant secondary metabolites present naturally in nectar, such as alkaloids, may change the behavioural responses of floral visitors and affect pollination. Some studies have shown that nectar containing low concentrations of these secondary metabolites is preferred by honey bee foragers over pure nectar. However, it remains unclear whether this is caused by dependence or addictive behaviour, a simple taste preference, or by other conditions such as self-medication. In our choice experiment, free-flying bees were presented with artificial flowers holding 20% sucrose containing 0.5−50 μg ml−1 of one of the naturally occurring nectar alkaloids - caffeine, nicotine, senecionine, and gelsemine. Nectar uptake was determined by weighing each flower and comparing the weight to that of the control flower. Our experimental design minimized memorizing and marking; despite this, caffeine was significantly preferred at concentrations 0.5−2 μg ml−1 over control nectar; this preference was not observed for other alkaloids. All of the compounds tested were repellent at concentrations above 5 μg ml−1. We confirmed previous reports that bees exhibit a preference for caffeine, and hypothesize that this is not due only to addictive behaviour but is at least partially mediated by taste preference. We observed no significant preference for nicotine or any other alkaloid.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adler LS (2000): The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91 409-420. doi: 10.1034/j.1600 0706.2000.910301.x.

  • Adler LS Irwin RE (2005): Ecological costs and benefits of defenses in nectar. Ecology 86 2968-2978. doi: 10.1890/05-0118.

  • Bainton RJ Tsai LTY Singh CM Moore MS Neckameyer WS Heberlein U (2000): Dopamine modulates acute responses to cocaine nicotine and ethanol in Drosophila. Current Biology 10 187-194. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00336-5.

  • Baracchi D Brown MJF Chittka L (2015): Weak and contradictory effects of self-medication with nectar nicotine by parasitized bumblebees. F1000Research 4 73. doi: 10.12688/ f1000research.6262.1.

  • Cook D Manson JS Gardner DR Welch KD Irwin RE (2013): Norditerpene alkaloid concentrations in tissues and floral rewards of larkspurs and impacts on pollinators. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 48 123-131. doi: 10.1016/j. bse.2012.11.015.

  • Gegear RJ Manson JS Thomson JD (2007): Ecological context influences pollinator deterrence by alkaloids in floral nectar. Ecology Letters 10 375-382. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01027.x.

  • Gherman BI Denner A Bobiş O Dezmirean DS Mărghitaş LA Schlüns H Moritz RFA Erler S (2014): Pathogen-associated self-medication behavior in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68 1777-1784. doi: 10.1007/s00265-014-1786-8.

  • Herrera CM Canto A Pozo MI Bazaga P (2009): Inhospitable sweetness: nectar filtering of pollinator-borne inocula leads to impoverished phylogenetically clustered yeast communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277 747-754. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1485.

  • Johnson SD Hargreaves AL Brown M (2006): Dark bitter- tasting nectar functions as a filter of flower visitors in a bird-pollinated plant. Ecology 87 2709-2716. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2709:DBNFAA]2.0.CO;2.

  • Kessler D Baldwin IT (2007): Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors of Nicotiana attenuata. The Plant Journal 49 840-854. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02995.x.

  • Kessler SC Tiedeken EJ Simcock KL Derveau S Mitchell J Softley S Stout JC Wright GA (2015): Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides. Nature 521 74-76. doi: 10.1038/nature14414.

  • Köhler A Pirk CWW Nicolson SW (2012): Honeybees and nectar nicotine: deterrence and reduced survival versus potential health benefits. Journal of Insect Physiology 58 286-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.12.002.

  • Manson JS Otterstatter MC Thomson JD (2010): Consumption of a nectar alkaloid reduces pathogen load in bumble bees. Oecologia 162 81-89. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1431-9.

  • Manson JS Cook D Gardner DR Irwin RE (2013): Dose‐dependent effects of nectar alkaloids in a montane plant-pol - linator community. Journal of Ecology 101 1604-1612. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12144.

  • Reinhard A Janke M von der Ohe W Kempf M Theuring C Hartmann T Schreier P Beuerle T (2009): Feeding deterrence and detrimental effects of pyrrolizidine alkaloids fed to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of Chemical Ecology 35 1086-1095. doi: 10.1007/s10886-009-9690-9.

  • Renwick JAA (2001): Variable diets and changing taste in plant-insect relationships. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27 1063-1076.

  • Schafer WR (2004): Addiction research in a simple animal model: the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Neuropharmacology 47 123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.06.026.

  • Singaravelan N Nee’man G Inbar M Izhaki I (2005): Feeding responses of free-flying honeybees to secondary compounds mimicking floral nectars. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31 2791-2804. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-8394-z.

  • Thomson JD Draguleasa MA Tan MG (2015): Flowers with caffeinated nectar receive more pollination. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 9 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s1 1829-014-9350-z.

  • Wink M (1988): Plant breeding: importance of plant secondary metabolites for protection against pathogens and herbivores. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 75 225-233.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.6

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.212
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.462

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 217 134 3
PDF Downloads 113 73 4