Participation of Environmental Science Students in an Open Discussion "Riga - European Green Capital"

Open access

Participation of Environmental Science Students in an Open Discussion "Riga - European Green Capital"

Starting from the year 2010, each year one European city is selected as the European Green Capital of the year. The award is granted to a city that has a consistent record of achieving high environmental standards, and is committed to ongoing and ambitious goals for further environmental improvement and sustainable development, as well as can act as a role model to inspire other cities and promote best practices to other European cities. Riga participated in the competition once, but did not fulfill the conditions, therefore an open discussion "Riga - European Green Capital" was organized by a nongovernmental organization "Association of Environmental Science Students". The aim of the discussion was to develop suggestions for the Riga city council on how to win the title "European Green Capital". Students of technical and engineering sciences were involved in the discussion to give their vision on what is needed for the city to comply with all the criteria of the competition. Thus, another aim of the discussion was to promote collaboration between students and the Riga city council in terms of environmental thinking.

As a result of the discussion, a nine-page letter was prepared with recommendations to the Riga city mayor on how to develop the city in a sustainable manner and outlining benefits which could arise if the city of Riga got the title. However, the most important outcome of the discussion are the skills which students gained from the experience of presenting their ideas and discussing them with specialists of the specific field. This should help in further studies and work, as well as in individual professional development. The discussions were also a starting point for further collaboration between the Riga city council and students from the Association of Latvian Environmental Science Students.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Kam-Fai H. Preferred teaching method: lecture discussion or tutorial? Studium 1973 No.4 p. 153. - 165.

  • Challen P. R. Brazdil L. C. Case studies as a basis for discussion method teaching in introductory chemistry courses. The Chemical Educator 1999 Vol.4 No.4 p. 1. - 13.

  • Cooper P. J. Simonds C.Communication for the Classroom Teacher. Pearson Education Canada 2010. 336 p.

  • Doyle F. J. Gatzke E. P. and Parker R. S. Practical Case Studies for Undergraduate Process Dynamics and Control Using Process Control Modules. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 1998 Vol.6 Issue 3 p. 181. - 191.

  • Hutchinson J. S. Teaching introductory chemistry using concept development case studies: Interactive and inductive learning. University Chemistry Education 2000 Vol. 4 No.1 p. 1. - 9.

  • Blackwell G. R. Group discussion techniques in a technical course. In: The 21st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference West Lafayette IN USA September 21 - 24 1991. Proceedings ‘Engineering Education in a New World Order' USA 1991 p. 430. - 432.

  • Omatseve B. O.J. The discussion teaching method: an interactive strategy in tertiary learning. Education 2007 [Online]. [Accessed 13.10.2010.]. Available:;col1

  • Memorandum of the European Green Capital title Tallinn 2006 [Accessed 15.10.2010.]. Available:

  • About the title European Green Capital [Accessed 15.10.2010.]. Available:

  • Declaration establishing the European Green Capital Award Brussels 2008 [Accessed 15.10.2010.]. Available:

  • Resident population by statistical region city and district at the beginning of the year 1990 - 2009. Central Statistical Bureau of Republic of Latvia. [Accessed 15.10.2010.]. Available:

  • The Expert Panel's Evaluation Work & Final Recommendations for the European Green Capital Award of 2010 and 2011 23rd January 2009 [Accessed 15.10.2010.]. Available:

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.67

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.86

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 164 42 0
PDF Downloads 70 27 1