Suggestions and Recommendations on Statistical Analysis and Research Methodology

Open access

1. Adrian Man, Cosmin Moldovan, Minodora Dobreanu, Major editorial changes of Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2013;21(4):377-80. DOI: 10.2478/rrlm-2013 0047

2. Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine/Versita [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 10]. Available from: http:// medicine/

3. Revista română de medicină de laborator [Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 1]. Available from: autori.php

4. license_to_publish.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 23]. Available from: to_publish.pdf

5. Dienes Z. Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: which side are you on? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6:274-290. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611406920

6. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611417632

7. Straus S, Richardson S, Glasziou P, Haynes B. Evidence based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3rd Edition, Elsevier 2005, p.115.






13. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412

14. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.0020124

15. Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, Austin CP, Blumenstein R, Bradley EW et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):187-91. DOI: 10.1038/nature11556

16. Sena E, van der Worp HB, Howells D, Macleod M. How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke? Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:433-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.009

17. Festing MF, Altman DG. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. ILAR J. 2002;43(4):244-58. DOI: 10.1093/ ilar.43.4.244

18. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 1988.

19. Nakagawa S, Foster TM. The case against retrospective statistical power analyses with an introduction to power analysis. Acta Ethologica. 2004;7(2):103-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10211-004-0095z

Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator

Romanian Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0,800
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0,655

CiteScore 2017: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.194
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.306


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 248 196 10
PDF Downloads 114 101 12