Study of Wastewaters Contaminated with Heavy Metals in Bioethanol Production

Open access

Abstract

Bioethanol as a substitute for traditional sources of energy, especially oil transport, is currently one of the most researched alternative motor fuels. Normally, bioethanol is produced from agricultural crops such as sugar cane or corn. However, this is counter-productive, because agriculture is primarily serving to ensure enough food for the people. It is therefore necessary to look for new production of appropriate non-food crops or find an added value to this process. Utilisation of contaminated water from metal industry could be one of them. Based on the hypothesis of reduction of some toxic metals with higher oxidation number is opening the possibility of using this wastewater in alcohol fermentation of any kind of biomass. In this study, hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) was used as a model contaminant in the process of aerobic fermentation of corn to bioethanol. To determine the reduction potential of glucose to Cr(VI), and to quantitatively determinate the glucose content after saccharification, UV/VIS spectrophotometry was used. As a method of qualitative determination of fermentation product, gas chromatography with mass detection was used. Infrared spectrometry was used for qualitative analyses of produced ethanol. Based on the established results shown in this paper, we can conclude that the presence of hexavalent chromium in the fermentation process does not have a significant negative impact, while offering the opportunity of using the industrial wastewaters for the production of bioethanol fuel.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. TCHOUNWOU P. B. YEDJOU C. G. PATLOLLA A. K. SUTTON D. J. 2012. Heavy Metals Toxicity and the Environment. EXS Vol. 101 pp. 133–164.

  • 2. AGRAFIOTI E. KALDERIS D. DIAMADOPOULOS E. 2014. Arsenic and chromium removal from water using biochars derived from rice husk organic solid wastes and sewage sludge. J. Environ. Manage. Vol. 133 pp. 309–314.

  • 3. AL-QAHTANI K. M. 2016. Water purification using different waste fruit cortexes for the removal of heavy metals. J. Taibah Univ. Sci.10(5) pp. 700–708.

  • 4. Dehghani M. H. Sanaei D. Ali I. Bhatnagar A. 2016. Removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution using treated waste newspaper as a low-cost adsorbent: Kinetic modeling and isotherm studies. J. Mol. Liq. vol. 215 pp. 671–679.

  • 5. FOCARDI S. PEPI M. FOCARDI S. E. 2013. Microbial Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium as a Mechanism of Detoxification and Possible Bioremediation Applications. Biodegrad. - Life Sci. No. Iii.

  • 6. LEITA L. MARGON A. SINICCO T. MONDINI C. 2011. Glucose promotes the reduction of hexavalent chromium in soil. Geoderma164(3–4) pp. 122–127.

  • 7. SHUGABA A. BUBA. F. 2012. Uptake and Reduction of Hexavalent Chromium by Aspergillus Niger and Aspergillus Parasiticus. J. Pet. Environ. Biotechnol.03(03).

  • 8. EPA method 7196A Chromium Hexavalent (Colorimetric) 1992.

  • 9. YAO L. LEE S. L. WANG T. DE MOURA J. M. L. N. JOHNSON L. A. 2012. Effects of fermentation substrate conditions on corn-soy co-fermentation for fuel ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 120 pp. 140–148.

  • 10. MILLER G. L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. vol. 3 pp. 426–428.

  • 11. OLTEANU Z. OPRICA L. TRUTA E. ZAMFIRACHE M. ROSU M. C. 2012. Changes induced by two chromium-containing compounds in antioxidaive response soluble protein level and amylase activity in barley seedlings.

  • 12. NAGARAJAN R. MEHROTA R. BAJAJ M. M. 2006. Quantitative analysis of methanol an adulterant in alcoholic beverages using attenualed total reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Vol. 65 pp. 416–419. ISSN:0975-1084

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 227 81 9
PDF Downloads 158 73 4