Ecotoxicity and Biodegradability Assessment of Metalworking Fluids by Activated Sludge Bacteria

Kristína Gerulová 1 , Adriána Mihálková 1 , Magdaléna Šergovičová 1 , Alexander Guoth 1 , and Zuzana Nádašská 1
  • 1 Institute of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Slovak University of Technology, Botanická 49, 917 24 Trnava, Slovak Republic

Ecotoxicity and Biodegradability Assessment of Metalworking Fluids by Activated Sludge Bacteria

The main aim of this study was to evaluate toxicity of metalworking fluids to bacterial consortium of activated sludge according to OECD 209 (STN EN ISO 8192) and a potential of the same sludge to degrade a part of the fluids according to OECD 302B.

Toxic impact can affect different responses, particularly the inhibition of respiration measured from the oxygen consumption in a closed bottle. The degradation rate was calculated from COD according to the authors such as van der Gast and Ian Thompson (1, 2) who tested the degradability of some MWFs in bioreactors by measuring the COD. The lowest toxic MWF's were Cimstar 597 and Emulzin H (the highest tested concentration was below EC50), then Zubora TXS (EC50 - 11 349 mg l-1), Aquamet LAK-E (EC50 - 5 228 mg l-1), Adrana D 407 (EC50 - 4 351 mg l-1) followed, and finally, Hocut 3380 (EC50 - 2 339 mg l-1) was assessed as the most toxic.

Important in this test (OECD 302B) is that the starting concentration of the tested substance must not decrease below 20% after 3 hours of cultivating. After that, it is impossible to distinguish biological degradation of organic matter from abiotic elimination from the suspension through adsorption. Tested were 8 MWFs of similar concentration and different addition of activated sludge - 0.25 g l-1, 0.50 g l-1 and 1.00 g l-1. The test showed that, after the first 3 hours of cultivating, adsorption grew with the increasing amount of inoculums, except of Akvol B (the decrease of the starting concentration after the first 3 hours of cultivating was the lowest of all and below 20%). It can be stated that, according to the test basic conditions, all the tested MWFs have a potential to ultimate degradation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • THOMPSON, I. Integrated Water Management Technologies: A case study or Moving towards more sustainable industrial solution (coolants, lubricants), CEH Oxford, University of Oxford & Microbial Solutions Ltd.

  • van der GAST, Ch., J., WHITELEY, S., A., THOMPSON, I., P. Temporal dynamics and degradation activity of an bacterial inoculum for treating waste metal-working fluid. In Environmental Microbiology, 2004, No. 6, pp. 254-263.

  • PETTERSSON, A. High-performance base fluids for environmentally adapted lubricants. In Tribology international, 2007, 40, pp. 638-645.

  • Engineering and Design lubricants and hydraulic fluids, Department of the Army U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000, EM 1110-2-124, CECW-ET Engineer Manual 1110-2-1424, 28 February 1999

  • 2005/360/EC - COMMISSION DECISION of 26 April 2005 establishing ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to lubricants (notified under document number C(2005) 1372)

  • WAGNER. H., LUTHER, R., MANG, T. Lubricant base fluids based on renewable raw materials their catalytic manufacture and modification. In Applied catalysis a: general, 2001, 221, pp. 429-442.

  • VERCAMMEN, K., BARRIGA, J., ARNSEK, A., Summary of results combining biolubricants and low friction coatings. PROJECT PROJECT CONTRACT G5RDCT-2000-00410

  • BARTZ, W. J. Lubricants and the envirinment. In Tribology International Vol. 31, Nos 1-3, 1998, pp. 35-47.

  • BERAN, E., Experience with evaluating biodegradability of lubricating base oils, In: Tribology International, 41, 2008, p. 1212-1218.

  • Biodegradability Primer, WISE Solutions - renevable lubricants; [cit. 2005-02-09]. available at:

  • VIDALI, M. Bioremediation - An overview. In Pure Applicable Chemistry, 2001, Vol. 73, No. 7, pp.1163-1172.

  • Engineering and Design: Lubricants and Hydraulic Fluids, Department of the army, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000, 31 July 2006, Manual No. 1110-2-1424.

  • BATTERSBY, N., S. The biodegradability and microbial toxicity testing of lubricants - some recommendations. In Chemosphere. 2000, No. 41, pp. 1011-1027.

  • STRUIJS, J., VAN DEN BERG, R., Standardized biodegradability tests: extrapolation to aerobic environments. In: War. Res. 1995, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 255-262.

  • EKENGREN, Ö., NIEMINEN, I., BERGSTRÖM, R. Environmentally acceptable metalworking processes. Ivl Swedish Environmental Vtt Research Institute, 2002-01-18, A96291.

  • OECD 209, OECD GUIDELINE FOR TESTING OF CHEMICALS, Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test, 1992.

  • TECHNICAL INFORMATION - SHELL ADRANA D 407, Last updated: 19.03.2008

  • Material safety data sheet - Aquamet LAK-E, Agip, Last updated: 28.3.2008

  • Material safety data shet - Shell adrana D 407, Last updated: 04/2003

  • Technical sheet, Aquamet LAK-E, Agip, 10.4.2006

  • Houghton's Hocut 3380 trial successful at Biomet - 1st August 2008, available at:

  • Material Safety Data Sheet, HOCUT 795, Houghton International Inc., Revision date: 03/10/2011

  • Material Safety Data Sheet, AKVOL B, FUCHS Oil Corporation (CZ), Spol s.r.o., 6.11.2007

  • Material Safety Data Sheet, Ecocool MK3, FUCHS Oil Corporation (CZ), Spol s.r.o., 29.01.2008

  • Material Safety Data Sheet, Emulzin H, FUCHS Oil Corporation (SK), Spol s.r.o., 31.03.2010

  • Material Safety Data Sheet, Zubora TXS, Zeller + Gmelin GmbH & co. KG, Revision date 26.04.2004

  • Material Safety Data Sheet, Quakercool 7030 LF, Quaker Chemical B. V., Revision date 04.11.2006


Journal + Issues