The article deals with an urgent issue of necessity to enhance professional training of future foreign language teachers. It has been substantiated that the only way to assess its quality is to use a set of professional standards. Theoretical substantiation of the standards elaborated by TESOL, as well as their step-by-step process of elaboration, have been studied. These standards served as a model for developing standards of foreign language teachers’ professional training in other countries. On their basis the standards of foreign language teachers’ professional training, as well as indicators of teachers’ performance for each of them, have been formulated as a role model for other countries which pay special attention to foreign language teachers’ training. The main difficulties of the standards implementation have been defined, as well as their possible solutions. One of the most urgent issues raised in the article is the necessity to elaborate a detailed system for assessing teachers’ correspondence to the standards and to adjust the existing training programs to them. Conclusions about productivity and efficiency of the conducted research can only be made after the standards approbation throughout the complete foreign language teachers’ training program that is 4-6 years (depending on the degree - Bachelor or Master). Still, at this stage of our research it is quite clear that one of the possible solutions to the problem of the necessity to elaborate a detailed system for assessing teachers’ correspondence to the standards and to adjust the existing training programs to them is involvement of stakeholders of different levels to elaboration of the standards (from future teachers to educational authorities). The practical value of the presented material is that it can be used by other countries for elaborating their own national standards.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Arter J. & McTighe J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks CA: Corwin Press.
2. Burke K. (Ed.). (2011). From standards to rubrics in 6 steps (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Corwin Press.
3. Canagarajah A. S. & Wurr A. J. (2011). Multilingual communication and language acquisition: New research directions. The Reading Matrix 11 (1) 1-15.
4. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning teaching assessment. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
5. Darling-Hammond L. (2017). Teacher Education Around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice? European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (3) 291-309.
6. Doiz A. Lasagabaster D. & Sierra J. M. (2011). Internationalization multilinguism and English-Medium Instruction. World Englishes 30 345-359.
7. Farrell T. S. C. (2014). Reflective practice in ESL teacher development groups: From practices to principles. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
8. Kuhlman N. Kneževič. (2013). The TESOL Guidelines for Developing EFL Professional Teaching Standards. TESOL International Association 2013. Retrieved from: https://www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/pdf/the-tesol-guidelines-for-developing-eflstandards.pdf?sfvrsn=0.
9. Kuhlman N. (2010). Developing foreign language teacher standards in Uruguay. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal 4 (1) 107-126.
10. Liyanage I. Walker T. & Singh P. (2015). TESOL professional standards in the “Asian century”: dilemmas facing Australian TESOL teacher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 35 (4) 485-497.
11. Mahboob A. & Tilakaratna N. (2012). Toward a principles-based approach for English language teaching policies and practices. White paper. Alexandria VA: TESOL International Association.
12. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010 November). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Retrieved from http://centralsquarefoundation.org/edresource/transforming-teacher-education-through-clinical-practice-a-national-strategy-to-prepareeffective-teachers/.
13. Richards J. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
14. Richards J. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency Pedagogy and Performance. RELC Journal 48 7-30.
15. Staehr Fenner D. & Kuhlman N. (2012). Preparing effective teachers of English language learners. Alexandria VA: TESOL International Association.
16. Stevens D. & Levi A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: an assessment tool to save grading time convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling VA: Stylus.
17. TESOL International Association. (2007). Position statement on the role of teacher’s associations in education policy and planning. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/docs/pdf/10040.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
18. TESOL International Association. (2010). TESOL P-12 professional teaching standards (2nd ed.). Alexandria VA: Author.
19. TESOL International Association. (2013). Implementing the common core state standards for ESL. The changing role of the ESL teacher. Alexandria VA: Author.
20. TESOL International Association. (2017). Draft 2017 TESOL standards for P-12 teacher education programs. Retrieved from: https://www.tesol.org/docs/defaultsource/advocacy/tesol_standards-p12-teacheredprograms-public-draft.pdf?sfvrsn=0