Foreign Approaches to Determining the Categories of Teachers' Professionalization and Professionalism in the System of Continuing Advanced Training

Open access

Abstract

In this article we have tried to switch our attention towards the contemporary debates about the teaching profession that are more focused on a recognized reality that the profession is changing due to the development of modern society, with more complex tasks in the system of pedagogic education. Accordingly, we felt it necessary to respond to several issues raised by researchers in this problem field: what skills should teachers possess in a society that is constantly evolving and changing? What are teachers to “know” and “know how to do?” How should they be prepared to practice this profession? What types of theoretical, methodological, professional skills do teachers need to achieve? What are the most appropriate and effective primary training programs for teaching staff?

Answers to these questions can only be “the professionalization of teaching career” and, in particular, the development of “professiogram” of the profession. We thought it would be useful to analyze aspects such as professionalism and professionalization, their interrelation and significance. In addition, the professionalization is realized on the basis of standard educational function, which, in its turn, indicates the presence of general and specific skills and abilities needed to realize the teaching profession.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Андрущенко В. Табачек І. (2005). Формування особистості вчителя в сучасних умовах [Forming teacher’s personality under modern conditions]. Політичний менеджмент № 1 (10) p. 58–69 (in Ukrainian).

  • 2. Волянюк Н. Ю. (2003). Профессиональное развитие субъекта деятельности [Professional development of the subject of activity]. Физическое воспитание студентов творческих спеціальностей. Харьков № 2 p. 37–47.

  • 3. Деркач А. А. (2004). Акмеологические основы развития профессионала [Achmeological foundations of professional’s development]. М. : Издательство Московского психолого-социального института; Воронеж : Издательство НПО «МОДЭКС» p. 752 (in Russian).

  • 4. Зеєр Е. Ф. (2009). Психология профессионального развития [Psychology of professional development]. М. : Академия p. 240 (in Russian).

  • 5. Маркова А. К. (1996). Психология профессионализма [Psychology of professionalism]. М. : Междунар. гуманит. фонд «Знание» p. 308 [in Russian].

  • 6. Маркова А. К. (1995). Психологические критерии и ступени профессионализма учителя [Psychological criteria of teacher’s professionalism]. Педагогика № 6 p. 55–63 (in Russian).

  • 7. Мукан Н. В. (2007). Сучасні дослідження в галузі підвищення кваліфікації вчителів у системі неперервної професійної освіти англомовного світу [Contemporary researches on the field of teachers’ advanced training in the system of continuing professional education of English-speaking world]. Retrieved 1.09.2014 from : http://vlp.com.ua/files/ 10_36.pdf.

  • 8. Отич О. (2010). Професійна адаптація молодого вчителя в умовах зміни ціннісної парадигми освіти [Professional adaptation of a young teacher under the conditions of the change of values’ paradigm in education]. Педагогіка і психологія професійної освіти № 1–2 p. 268 p. 9–17 (in Ukrainian).

  • 9. Понзель У. (2012). Формування професіоналізму педагога [Pegagogue’s professionalism formation]. In: Бідюк Н. М. (Ed.) Порівняльна професійна педагогіка No 2 p. 213–218 (in Ukrainian).

  • 10. Попенко О. М. (2012). Професійна культура вчителя як інтеграційна якість особистості педагога-професіонала [Teacher’s professional culture as an integrative quality of pedagogue-professional’s personality]. Наукові записки НДУ ім. М. Гоголя. Психолого-педагогічні науки [Scientific notes of Nizhyn State University named after Mykola Gogol. Psychological and pedagogical sciences] № 1 p. 44–46 (in Ukrainian).

  • 11. Aldescu-Balas C. E. (2010). Student’s Initial Training for the Didactic Profession. PhD Thesis. Summary [PhD Candidate]. Cluj-Napoca p. 41 (in English).

  • 12. Cochran-Smith M. (2001). The outcomes question in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education No 17 р. 527–546.

  • 13. Hargreaves A. (2000). Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning. Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice Vol. 6 No. 2 p. 32.

  • 14. Schratz M. (2010). What is a “European Teacher”? A Discussion Paper European Network on Teacher Education Policies (ENTEP). Retrieved 1.09.2014 from : http://www. sdcentras.lt/pla/res/Schratz.pdf.

  • 15. Schön D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner : How Professionals Think in Action. London : Temple Smith p. 374.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 183 71 0
PDF Downloads 53 20 0