INTRODUCTION: The link between the neurosurgeon’s knowledge and the scientific improvements made a dramatic change in the field expressed both in impressive drop in the mortality and morbidity rates that were operated in the beginning of the XXth century and in operating with high rates of success cases that were considered inoperable in the past. Neuronavigation systems have been used for many years on surgical orientation purposes especially for small, deep seated lesions where the use of neuronavigation is correlated with smaller corticotomies and with the extended use of transulcal approaches. The major problem of neuronavigation, the brainshift once the dura is opened can be solved either by integrated ultrasound or intraoperative MRI which is out of reach for many neurosurgical departments. METHOD: The procedure of neuronavigation and ultrasonic localization of the tumor is described starting with positioning the patient in the visual field of the neuronavigation integrated 3D ultrasonography system to the control of tumor resection by repeating the ultrasonographic scan in the end of the procedure. DISCUSSION: As demonstrated by many clinical trials on gliomas, the more tumor removed, the better long term control of tumor regrowth and the longer survival with a good quality of life. Of course, no matter how aggressive the surgery, no new deficits are acceptable in the modern era neurosurgery. There are many adjuvant methods for the neurosurgeon to achieve this maximal and safe tumor removal, including the 3T MRI combined with tractography and functional MRI, the intraoperative neuronavigation and neurophysiologic monitoring in both anesthetized and awake patients. The ultrasonography integrated in neuronavigaton comes as a welcomed addition to this adjuvants to help the surgeon achieve the set purpose. CONCLUSION: With the use of this real time imaging device, the common problem of brainshift encountered with the neuronavigation systems is covered and any eventual tumor residue can be spotted by ultrasonography and resected
2.Claus EB, Horlacher A, Hsu L, Schwartz RB, Dello- Iacono D, Talos F, et al: Survival rates in patients with low-grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer 103:1227-1233, 2005
3.Smith JS, Chang EF, Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD, Cha S, et al: Role of extent of resection in the longterm outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol 26: 1338-1345, 2008
4.Holodny AI, Schwartz TH, Ollenschleger M, Liu WC, Schulder M: Tumor involvement of the corticospinal tract: Diffusion magnetic resonance tractography with intraoperative correlation. J Neurosurg 95:1082, 2001.
5. Nimsky C, Gansland O, Cerny S, Hastreiter P, Greiner G, Fahlbusch R: Quantification of, visualization of, and compensation for brain shift using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 47:1070-1080, 2000.
6.Nimsky C, Gansland O, Hastreiter P, Fahlbusch R: Intraoperative compensation for brain shift. Surg Neurol 56:357-365, 2001.
7.Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A, Di Chiro G: Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 201:637-648, 1996.
8.Unsgaard G, Ommedal S, Muller T, Gronningsaeter A, Nagelhus Hernes TA: Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: Initial experience during brain tumor resection. Neurosurgery 50:804-812, 2002.
9. Auer LM, van Velthoven V: Intraoperative ultrasound (US) imaging: Comparison of pathomorphological findings in US and CT. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 104:84-95, 1990
10.Berger MS, Deliganis AV, Dobbins J, Keles GE: The effect of extent of resection on recurrence in patients with low grade cerebral hemisphere gliomas. Cancer 74:1784-1791, 1994
11.Black PM, Moriarty T, Alexander E III, Stieg P, Woodard EJ, Gleason PL, et al: Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery 41:831-845, 1997
12. Chacko AG, Kumar NK, Chacko G, Athyal R, Rajshekhar V: Intraoperative ultrasound in determining the extent of resection of parenchymal brain tumours-a comparative study with computed tomography and histopathology. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:743-748, 2003
13. Chandler WF, Knake JE, McGillicuddy JE, Lillehei KO, Silver TM: Intraoperative use of real-time ultrasonography in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 57:157-163, 1982
14.Fahlbusch R, Samii A: A review of cranial imaging techniques Lindner D, Trantakis C, Renner C, Arnold S, Schmitgen A, Schneider J, et al: Application of intraoperative 3D ultrasound during navigated tumor resection. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:197-202, 2006
15. Mäurer M, Becker G, Wagner R, Woydt M, Hofmann E, Puls I, et al: Early postoperative transcranial sonography (TCS),
16.Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R: Intraoperative visualization for resection of gliomas: The role of functional neuronavigation and intraoperative 1.5 T MRI. Neurol Res 28:482-487, 2006
17. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Kober H, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging combined with neuronavigation: a new concept. Neurosurgery 48:1082- 1091, 2001
18. Regelsberger J, Lohmann F, Helmke K, Westphal M: Ultrasound guided surgery of deep seated brain lesions. Eur J Ultrasound 12:115-121, 2000
19. Roth J, Biyani N, Beni-Adani L, Constantini S: Realtime neuronavigation with high-quality 3D ultrasound SonoWand in pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 43:185-191, 2007
20.Rubin JM, Quint DJ: Intraoperative US versus intraoperative MR imaging for guidance during intracranial neurosurgery. Radiology 215:917-918, 2000
21. Rygh OM, Nagelhus Hernes TA, Lindseth F, Selbekk T, Brostrup Müller T, Unsgaard G: Intraoperative navigated 3-dimensional ultrasound angiography in tumor surgery. Surg Neurol 66:581-592, 2006
22.Tronnier VM, Bonsanto MM, Staubert A, Knauth M, Kunze S, Wirtz CR: Comparison of intraoperative MR imaging and 3D-navigated ultrasonography in the detection and resection control of lesions. Neurosurg Focus 10(2):E3, 2001
23.Unsgaard G, Rygh OM, Selbekk T, Selbekk T, Brostrup Müller T, Unsgaard G: Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:235-253, 2006