Amputation, psychological consequences, and quality of life among Romanian patients

Alin Cristinel Cotigă 1 , 2 , Mirela Zivari 1 , Adrian Cursaru 3 , 5 , Cătălin Aliuş 4 , and Claudiu Ivan 6
  • 1 Department of Psychology, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
  • 2 Department of Psychology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
  • 3 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
  • 4 Department of General Surgery, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
  • 5 “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, , Bucharest, Romania
  • 6 Research Centre for Education and Life Chances, , Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

Amputation of the limb is a major psychological health issue that was not fully studied. Patients and their families struggle with symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, phantom limb phenomena, etc. There is also a tremendous impact on the person’s quality of life.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the psychological symptoms of depression, anxiety, and the quality of life among persons suffering from amputation of the limb.

Methods: 31 respondents agreed to participate in the study. They were recruited from the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. The medical conditions and the socio-demographic data (i.e., gender, marital status, income, etc.) along with the assessment of the psychological conditions and quality of life were contributions to the statistical analysis of the study.

Results: This study showed that levels of depression are moderate to severe for a significant percent of the population (i.e., a “moderate to severe” or “severe” level of depression was presented by 29% of the patients according to the PHQ-9 test, and 16.1% of the patients according to Beck’s Depression Inventory). Moreover, the levels of anxiety were relatively higher than those of the general population (i.e., severe anxiety was confirmed by the GAD-7 test in the case of 38.7% of the patients) and for most of them the quality of life was impaired.

Discussion: Amputation occurs mainly in adults/elderly aged over 50 years, married, living in urban areas, with different levels of depression and anxiety. At least half of them had a self-perceived health condition that was deteriorated, their physical and role functioning being primarily affected.

Conclusion: There is a need for psychological support of the patients suffering from limb amputation as most of the studies showed high prevalence of depression and anxiety. Socio-demographic factors also represent important elements in defining the quality of life of those patients.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Bhuvaneswar CG, Epstein LA, Stern TA. Reaction to Amputation: Recognition and Treatment. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007; 9:303-308. https://doi:10.4088/pcc.v09n0408.

  • 2. Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81:292-300. https://doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90074-1.

  • 3. Atherton R, Robertson N. Psychological adjustment to lower limb amputation amongst prosthesis users. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28:1201-1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600551674.

  • 4. Hawamdeh ZM, Othman YS, Ibrahim, AI. Assessment of anxiety and depression after lower limb amputation in Jordanian patients. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008; 4:627-633. https://doi:10.2147/ndt.s2541.

  • 5. Singh R, Ripley D, Pentland B, Todd I, Hunter J, Hutton L, Philip A. Depression and anxiety symptoms after lower limb amputation: the rise and fall. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:281-286. https://doi:10.1177/0269215508094710.

  • 6. Cansever A, Uzun O, Yildiz C, Ates A, Atesalp AS. Depression in men with traumatic lower part amputation: a comparison to men with surgical lower part amputation. Mil Med. 2003; 168:106-109.

  • 7. Ghous M, Gul S, Siddiqi FA, Pervaiz S, Bano S. Depression; prevalence among amputees. Prof Med J. 2015; 22:263-266.

  • 8. Perkins ZB, De’Ath HD, Sharp G, Tai NR. Factors affecting outcome after traumatic limb amputation. Br J Surg.2012; 99 Suppl1:75-86. https://doi:10.1002/bjs.7766.

  • 9. Christensen J, Ipsen T, Doherty P, Langberg H. Physical and social factors determining quality of life for veterans with lower-limb amputation(s): a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38:2345-2353. https://doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1129446.

  • 10. Grzebie A, Chabowski M, Malinowski M, Uchmanowicz I, Milan M, Janczak D. Analysis of selected factors determining quality of life in patients after lower limb amputation-a review article. Pol J Surg. 2017; 89:57-61. https://doi:10.5604/01.3001.0009.8980.

  • 11. Zidarov D, Swaine B, Gauthier-Gagnon C. Quality of life of persons with lower-limb amputation during rehabilitation and at 3-month follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90:634-645. https://doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.003.

  • 12. Racy JC. Psychological aspects of amputation. In Michael JW. Atlas of Limb Prosthetics: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principle. 2nd edn., 2002, Rosemont, IL, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. https://www.oandplibrary.org/alp/chap28-01.asp. Accessed 23 January 2020.

  • 13. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez, NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JCJM, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in Oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst.1993; 85:365-376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.

  • 14. King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996; 5:555-567. https://doi:10.1007/BF00439229.

  • 15. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9. Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16:606-613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

  • 16. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166:1092-1097. https://doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

  • 17. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:561-571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.

  • 18. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. 3rd edn. 2001, Brussels, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search