Interpretation of high resolution airborne magnetic data (HRAMD) of Ilesha and its environs, Southwest Nigeria, using Euler deconvolution method

Open access

Abstract

Interpretation of high resolution aeromagnetic data of Ilesha and its environs within the basement complex of the geological setting of Southwestern Nigeria was carried out in the study. The study area is delimited by geographic latitudes 7°30′–8°00′N and longitudes 4°30′–5°00′E. This investigation was carried out using Euler deconvolution on filtered digitised total magnetic data (Sheet Number 243) to delineate geological structures within the area under consideration. The digitised airborne magnetic data acquired in 2009 were obtained from the archives of the Nigeria Geological Survey Agency (NGSA). The airborne magnetic data were filtered, processed and enhanced; the resultant data were subjected to qualitative and quantitative magnetic interpretation, geometry and depth weighting analyses across the study area using Euler deconvolution filter control file in Oasis Montag software. Total magnetic intensity distribution in the field ranged from –77.7 to 139.7 nT. Total magnetic field intensities reveal high-magnitude magnetic intensity values (high-amplitude anomaly) and magnetic low intensities (low-amplitude magnetic anomaly) in the area under consideration. The study area is characterised with high intensity correlated with lithological variation in the basement. The sharp contrast is enhanced due to the sharp contrast in magnetic intensity between the magnetic susceptibilities of the crystalline and sedimentary rocks. The reduced-to-equator (RTE) map is characterised by high frequencies, short wavelengths, small size, weak intensity, sharp low amplitude and nearly irregular shaped anomalies, which may due to near-surface sources, such as shallow geologic units and cultural features. Euler deconvolution solution indicates a generally undulating basement, with a depth ranging from −500 to 1000 m. The Euler deconvolution results show that the basement relief is generally gentle and flat, lying within the basement terrain.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Milson J. (2003): Field Geophysics. England: John Wiley & Sons 249 p.

  • [2] Reeves C. (2007): Aeromagnetic Surveys: principle practice and interpretation. Geosoft INC 155 p.

  • [3] Badejo A.O. Adekunle A.A Oyerinde A.O. (2013): Pollution studies on groundwater contamination: water quality of Abeokuta Ogun State Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Environment and Earth Sciences 3 pp. 162–166.

  • [4] De Swardt A.J. (1953): The geology of the country around Ilesha. Geological Survey of Nigeria Bulletin 23 55 p.

  • [5] Russ P. (1957): Airborne electromagnetics in review. Geophysics 22 pp. 691–713.

  • [6] Hurley S. (1966): Electromagnetic reflections in salt deposits. Journal of Geophysics 32 pp. 633–637.

  • [7] Hurley S. (1970): Radar propagation in rock salt. Geophysical Prospecting 18 pp. 312–328.

  • [8] Rahaman M.A. (1976): A review of the basement geology of Nigeria in kogbe. Geology of Nigeria Elizabeth publishing CO pp. 41–58.

  • [9] Ajayi T.R. (1981): On the geochemistry and origin of the amphibolites of Ife Ilesha area South West Nigeria. Journal of Mining and Geology 17 pp. 179–196.

  • [10] Briggs I. (1974): Machine contouring using minimum curvature. Geophysics 39 pp. 39–48.

  • [11] Hildenbrand T.G. (1983): A Filtering Program based on two – dimensional Fourier analysis. U.S. Geological Survey 61 p.

  • [12] Hinze J. et al. (2005): New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database. Geophysics 70 pp. 25–32.

  • [13] Luo Y. Xue D. Wang M. (2010): Reduction to the pole at the equator. Chinese Journal of Geophysics 53 pp. 1082–1089.

  • [14] Gun P. J. (1975): Linear transformation of gravity and magnetic fields. Geophysical Prospecting 23 pp. 300–312.

  • [15] Hood P. (1965): Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying: Geophysics 30 891–902.

  • [16] Thompson D.T. (1982): EULDPH: a new technique for making computer–assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47 pp. 31–37.

  • [17] Reid A.B. Allsop J.M. Ganser H. Millett A.J. Somerton I.W. (1990): Magnetic Interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55 80–91.

  • [18] Hsu K.S. Coppens D. Shyu C.T. (2002): Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytical signal. Geophysics 63 pp. 194–1957.

  • [19] Mushayandebvu M.F. Driel V. Reid A.B. Fairhead J.D. (2001): Magnetic source parameters of 2D structures using extended Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 66 pp. 814–823.

  • [20] Stavrev P. Reid A. (2007): Degrees of homogeneity of potential fields and structural indices of Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 72 1–12.

  • [21] Melo F.F. Barbosa V.C.F. Uieda L. Oliveira V.C. Silva J.B.C. (2013): Estimating the nature and the horizontal and vertical positions of 3D magnetic sources using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 78 87–98.

  • [22] Silva J.B.C. Barbosa V.C.F. (2003): 3D Euler deconvolution: Theoretical basis for automatically selecting good solutions. Geophysics 68 pp. 1962–1968.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 277 124 7
PDF Downloads 234 149 9