The railway infrastructure is a very important component of the world’s total transportation network. Investment in its construction and maintenance is significant on a global scale. Previously published life cycle assessment (LCA) studies performed on road and rail systems very seldom included infrastructures in detail, mainly choosing to focus on vehicle manufacturing and fuel consumption. This article presents results from an environmental study for railway steel bridge materials for the demonstration case of the Buna Bridge in Croatia. The goal of these analyses was to compare two different types of remediation works for railway bridges with different materials and construction types. In the first part, the environmental impact of the classical concrete bridge construction was calculated, whereas in the second one, an alternative new solution, namely, the strengthening of the old steel bridge with ultra-high-performance fibre-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) deck, was studied. The results of the LCA show that the new solution with UHPFRC deck gives much better environmental performance. Up to now, results of LCA of railway open lines, railway bridges and tunnels have been published, but detailed analyses of the new solution with UHPFRC deck above the old bridge have not previously been performed.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
 Jonsson D. K. (2007): Indirect energy associated with Swedish road transport. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research; 7(3) pp. 183–200.
 Federici M. S. Ulgiati et al. (2003): Efficiency and sustainability indicators for passenger and commodities transportation systems. The case of Siena Italy. Ecological Indicators; 3 pp. 155–169.
 Caroll M. (2010); An Investigation into Concrete Composite Strengthening of a Continuous Wrought Iron Railway Bridge using Precast Concrete Deck Slabs Bridge University of Surrey MSc Thesis.
 Network Rail (2006): Railway Bridges Today and Tomorrow Proceedings of the conference UK.
 Olofsson I. Elfgren L. Bell B. Paulsson B. Niederleithinger E. Sandager J. Jensen Feltrin G. Täljsten B. Cremona C. Kiviluoma R. Bien J. (2005): Assessment of European railway bridges for future traffic demands and longer lives – EC project “Sustainable Bridges” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering; 1(2) pp. 93–100.
 Lounis Z. et al. (2010): Towards sustainable design of highway bridges. National Research Council of Canada.
 Stengel T. Schießl P. (2009): Life cycle assessment of UHPC bridge constructions: Sherbrooke footbridge Kassel Gärtnerplatz footbridge and Wapello road bridge. Architecture civil engineering environment 1/2009 pp. 109–118
 Brühwiler E. Denarié E. (2008): Rehabilitation of concrete structures using Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete in Proceedings UHPC-2008: The Second International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete March 05–07 2008 Kassel Germany. Kassel University Press pp. 895–902.
 Denarié E. & Brühwiler E. (2006a): Structural rehabilitations with Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concretes International Journal for Restoration of Buildings and Monuments Aedificatio; 12(5 and 6) 453–467.
 Denarié et al. (2006b): Full scale application of UHPFRC for the rehabilitation of bridges – from the lab to the field Deliverable SAMARIS D22http://samaris.zag.si/.
 Denarié et al. (2006c): Guidance for the use of UHPFRC for rehabilitation of concrete highway structures Deliverable SAMARIS D25bhttp://samaris.zag.si/.
 Šajna A. Strupi-Šuput J. Denarie E. Brühwiler E. Habert G. Rossi P. Reščič L. Wierzbicki T. (2010): Composite UHPFRC-concrete construction for rehabilitation - most recent advances and applications. V: Frangopol Dan M. (ur.). Bridge maintenance safety and management and life-cycle optimization: proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance Safety and Management Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA 11–15 July 2010. Boca Raton [etc.]: CRC Press cop. 2010 pp. 445–446
 Denarie E. Habert G. Šajna A. (2009): Recommendations for the use of UHPFRC for composite structural members: rehabilitation Log Čezsoški bridge. Brussels: FEHRL 2009. 58 p. http://arches.fehrl.org/?m=7&id_directory=1622
 Fifer Bizjak K. Knez F. Lernart S. Slanc K. (2016): Life-cycle assessment and repair of the railway transition zones of an existing bridge using geocomposite materials. Structure and infrastructure engineering ISSN 1573-2479 Apr. 2016 pp. 1–14.
 Roth A. Kåberger T. (2001): Making transport systems sustainable. Journal of Cleaner Production; 10 (2002) pp. 361–371.
 EN ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework (ISO 14040:2006)
 EN ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044:2006)
 PCR – Product Category Rules for prepairing an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Interurban railway transport services of passengers UN CPC 6421 Railway transport services of freight UN CPC 6512 and Railways UP CPC 53212 PCR 2009:03 Ver 1.0 The international EPD Consortium.
 Džajić I Klofutar J. Mikulić T. Stipanovič oslaković I. Šajna A. Vajdić M. (2015): Deliverable 3.3 Rehabilitation of bridges and Tunnels. Recommendations for the rehabilitation of engineering structures (bridges and tunnels) on the existing railway track with balastless track system. University College Dublin.
 University of Stuttgart and PE Europe (2007): Users manual Gabi 4.4 University of Stuttgart.
 Sleeswijk A.W. van Oers L.F.C.M. Guinée J.B. Struijs J. Huijbregts M. (2008): Normalisation in Product Life Cycle Assessment: An LCA of the Global and European Economic Systems in the Year 2000. Science of the Total Environment; 390 pp. 227–240.