Pedestrianism as an Effective Tool for Sustainable Intra-City Commuting in Calabar, Southern Nigeria

Open access

Abstract

The promotion of walking has become a global strategy in sustainable urban transportation planning. This is with the aim of reducing the urban commuter’s problems that result from the dominance of motorized urban transit, especially in developing countries with an increasing rate of urbanization. This study is carried out in Calabar, Southern Nigeria with the aim of assessing the conditions under which pedestrianism is enhanced. Research questionnaires were administered to household heads in all 22 localities with political delineation (wards) in the city. Respondents were sampled using the stratified sampling technique where every 10th residential house is sampled after the initial listing of houses. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict the conditions under which about 382 household heads (about 98% respondent rate) in Calabar could undertake utilitarian walking using factors such as motorized traffic, weather conditions, lack of safety of pedestrians and socio-economic variables as category predictors. A test of the full model against a constant single model was statistically significant, indicating that the predictors, as a set, reliably distinguished utilitarian walking and non-walking (chi square = 60.544, p < .001 with df = 17). Nagelkerke’s R2 of .232 indicated a moderately strong relationship between prediction and grouping. Prediction success overall was 70.5% (53.5% for non-walking, and 81.5% for walking). The Wald criterion demonstrated that only pedestrian conflict, lack of safety of pedestrian and the age of the pedestrian made a significant contribution to the prediction in model 1 (p = .000). Furthermore, about 99.2% of pedestrians indicated walking distances of not more than 5km while on the other hand, they can afford 0.8km to bus station, 3km to school, 5km for shopping, and about 20km for recreation trips. The study recommended counseling strategies for promoting pedestrianism among which is the development of pedestrian walkways and complementary facilities to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1]. ALFONZO M. A.: To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior 37(6) 808-836 2005.

  • [2]. BANISTER D.: Sustainable urban development and transport-a Eurovision for 2020. Transport Reviews 20(1) 113-130 2000.

  • [3]. EWING R. SCHROEER W. GREENE W.: School location and student travel. Analysis of Factors Effecting Mode choice Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1895 55-63 2004.

  • [4]. Ewing Reid Ross C. Brownson and David Berrigan: “Relationship between urban sprawl and weight of United States youth” American journal of preventive medicine 31 no. 6 (2006): 464-474. 2006

  • [5]. Fruin J. J.: Pedestrian planning and design (No. 206 pp) 1971.

  • [6]. Gómez L. F C. P. Diana D. Buchner R. C. Brownson O.L. Sarmiento J. D. Pinzón M. Ardila J. Moreno M. Serrato F. Lobelo: Built Environment Attributes and Walking Patterns Among the Elderly Population in Bogotá. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 38(6):592–599. 2010.

  • [7]. Hankey S. Lindsey G. Wang X. Borah J. Hoff K. Utecht B. & Xu Z.: Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis MN. Landscape and Urban Planning107(3) 307-316. 2012.

  • [8]. Larco N. Steiner B. Stockard J. & West A.: Pedestrian-friendly environments and active travel for residents of multifamily housing the role of preferences and perceptions. Environment and Behavior 44(3) 303-333. 2012.

  • [9]. Mohan D. & Tiwari G.: Sustainable transport systems: linkages between environmental issues public transport non-motorised transport and safety. Economic and Political Weekly 1589-1596. 1999.

  • [10]. Nagel C. L. Carlson N. E. Bosworth M. & Michael Y. L.: The relation between neighborhood built environment and walking activity among older adults. American journal of epidemiology 168(4) 461-468. 2008.

  • [11]. Nazelle A. Rodríguez D. A. & Crawford-Brown D.: The built environment and health: impacts of pedestrian-friendly designs on air pollution exposure. Science of the Total Environment 407(8) 2525-2535. 2009.

  • [12]. Okon I. E. C. O. Ogba M. A. Idoko D. D. Eni and R. O. Sule: Climate Change and the Challenges of Flood Mitigation in Calabar Urban South-South Nigeria. International Journal of Ecology and Ecosolution 2 (3) pp. 41-48. 2015.

  • [13]. Okon I. Ogba C. O. & Olorundami T.: An Assessment of Residents’ willingness to convert to Bicycle mode for intra-city transportation in Calabar. Journal of Transportation Letters in (International press). 2017.

  • [14]. Owen N. Humpel N. Leslie E. Bauman A. & Sallis J. F.: Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. American journal of preventive medicine 27(1) 67-76. 2004.

  • [15]. Pucher J and L. Dijkstra: Making Walking and Cycling Safer: Lessons from Europe. Transportation Quarterly 54 (3) pp. 53-64. 2000.

  • [16]. Saelens B.E. Sallis J.F. & Frank L.D.: Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation urban design and planning literatures. annals of behavioural Medicine 25 (2) pp. 80-91. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03. 2003.

  • [17]. Stern N.: The economics of climate change: the Stern review: Cambridge University press. 2007.

  • [18]. Sugiyama T. Neuhaus M. Cole R. Giles-Corti B. & Owen N.: Destination and route attributes associated with adults’ walking: a review. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 44(7) 1275-1286. 2012.

  • [19]. Wey W. M. & Chiu Y. H.: Assessing the walkability of pedestrian environment under the transit-oriented development. Habitat International 38 106-118. 2013.

  • [20]. World Health Organisation (WHO): Road traffic injuries. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs358/en/. 2016.

  • [21]. Yazid M. R. M. Ismail R. & Atiq R.: The Use of Non-Motorized For Sustainable Transportation in Malaysia. Procedia Engineering 20(0) 125-134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.147. 2011

Suche
Zeitschrifteninformation
Metriken
Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 189 122 4
PDF Downloads 130 87 3