Checking the low track lattice girder bridges for robustness

Open access


When you say about a thing or a being that they are robust, you imagine a complete entity from the point of view of its component parts giving out force and safety. The notion of robustness is associated with a lot of activity domains. Consequently, there are many definitions individualizing the robustness notion depending on the study domain.

The work aims to join in the present day studies with a new research in the bridge domain. The object of the study is represented by three low track steel lattice girder railway bridges.

In the article there is also presented the way the structural robustness notion is to be found in the national codes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] BRISCOE T. - Robust Parsing - Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology G.B. Varile and A. Zampolli Editors. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; New York; Pisa Italy. 513p. 1997

  • [2] BUCUR C. BUCUR V.M. ZANAICA L. SANTOS S.H.C. - Comment on European Codes and Comparison of Brazilian, Italian, Romanian Codes – Concerning the Approach of Robustness - Engenharia Estudo e Pesquisa ABPE (Asoc. Braziliană de Poduri și Structuri – filială IABSE) v.14 nr.2 pp. 27-45-jul./dez. 2014 ISSN 2316-591X; www.revistaeep.com2014

  • [3] BUCUR C. DERZSI S. – Scenarios for Robustness evaluations of a Bridge type structure – Lattice girder parallel flanges low track – International multidisciplinary scientific geoconferences SGEM-2014 Bulgaria – Conference Proceedings Vol. III pp.369-376 > ISSN 1314-2704; ISBN 978-619-7105-19-3; DOI 10.5593/sgem2014B53 2014

  • [4] FABER M. NARASIMHAN H. - COST Action TU0601 – Robustness of Structures : A summary 2011

  • [5] KOUVELIS P. YU G. - Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications. Non-convex Optimization and Its Applications; V14. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht Boston 356 p. 1997

  • [6] MEYER B. - Object-Oriented Software Construction - 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR 1254 p. 1997

  • [7] SANTOS S.H. ZANAICA L. BUCUR C. LIMA S.S. ARAI A. – Comparative study of Codes for the Seismic design of Structures - Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering Vol. 9 - No. 1-2013 pp 1-15 DOI: 10.2478/mmce-2013-0001 – and

  • [8] SLOTINE JJE LI W. - Applied Nonlinear Control - Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs N.J. 459 p. 1991

  • [9] *** COST Action TU0601 & E55 pp. 91-102 ISSN 978-3-909386-29-1 Switzerland/2010; and the site

  • [10] *** GSA - Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects - June 2003

  • [11] *** Review of international research on structural robustness and disproportionate collapse – Communities and Local Government Centre of the Protection of National Infrastructure – Arup 2011

  • [12] *** Cod de proiectare seismică Partea 1 - P100-1/2013 Prevederi de proiectare pentru clădiri 2013 [Seismic Design Code P100-1/2013 – Design Provisions for Buildings]

  • [13] *** SR-EN 1990:2004 - Bazele proiectării structurilor

  • [14] *** SR-EN 1991-1-7:2007 Euro-code 1: Partea 1-7 Acțiuni generale – Acțiuni Accidentale [EN 1991-1-7:2006 Euro-code 1 – Actions on Structures – Part 1-7: General Actions – Accidental Actions. London: British Standards Institution]

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 170 53 2
PDF Downloads 68 37 1