Whiplash syndrome is a quite common pathology and can be defined as a neck injury produced by a sudden acceleration-deceleration, the consequence of which is a sudden forward and backward movement of the head and neck. The main production mechanism is a sudden acceleration-deceleration process that has as a consequence the sudden extension/flexion of the neck. Starting from the many structures involved, the whiplash syndrome is an interdisciplinary challenge (ENT specialist, neurologist, orthopedist, ophthalmologist, psychologist) and can be described by multiple signs and symptoms.
Whiplash syndrome is a complex pathology both through the mechanism of production and symptoms, and through the forensic implications that it has. The interdisciplinary medical collaboration, the implementation of stricter rules on wearing the seat belt and the development by car manufacturers of chairs and head restraints that protect the head and neck of passengers, would be the preventive step in the occurrence and especially the chronicization of these lesions.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Crowe HE. Injuries of the cervical spine. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Orthopaedic Association. San Francisco, USA; 1928.
2. Cesarani A, Claussen CF, Alpini D. Whiplash: An Interdisciplinary Challenge. In: Cesarani A, Alpini DC, Boniver R, Claussen CF, Gagey PM, Magnusson L, et al. Whiplash Injuries. Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer-Verlag Mailand, Milano; 1996, p.3-12.
3. Jenkins A, Teasdale G, Hadley MD, Macpherson P, Rowan JO. Brain lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in mild and severe head injuries. Lancet. 1986;2(8504):445-6.
4. Williams JF, McKenzie JA. The effect of collision severity on the motion of the head and neck during “whiplash”. J Biomech. 1975;8(3-4):257-9.
5. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(8 Suppl):1S-73S.
6. Downs J, Twomey L. The whiplash syndrome. Aust J Physiother. 1979;25(6):233-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)61046-1.
9. Magnusson M, Karlberg M. Pathophysiology of whiplash associated disorders: theories and controversies. In: Cesarani A, Alpini DC, Boniver R, Claussen CF, Gagey PM, Magnusson L, et al. Whiplash Injuries. Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer-Verlag Mailand, Milano; 1996, p.47-51.
10. Pearce JM. Polemics of chronic whiplash injury. Neurology. 1994;44(11):1993-7.
11. Johansson H, Sojka P. Pathophysiological mechanisms involved in genesis and spread of muscular tension in occupational muscle pain and in chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes: a hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 1991;35(3):196–203.
12. Jankovic J. Post traumatic movement disorders: central and peripheral mechanisms. Neurology. 1994;44(11):2006-14.
13. Jankovic J, Van der Linden C. Dystonia and tremor induced by peripheral trauma: predisposing factors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51(12):1512-9.
14. Cole JD, Illis LS, Sedgewick EM. Unilateral essential tremor after wrist immobilization: a case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52(2):286-7.
31. Scott W, Wideman TH, Sullivan MJ. Clinically meaningful scores on pain catastrophizing before and after multidisciplinary rehabilitation: a prospective study of individuals with subacute pain after whiplash injury. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(3):183-90. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31828eee6c.