Some forensic aspects of the nasal septal deformities

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. We reviewed the foreign aspects in nasal septal deformities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. Mladina classification of the nasal septal deformities was used.

RESULTS. Types 5 and 6 have been dominantly inherited. The mechanism of the onset and possible connection to the trauma against the nose, as well as clinical implications of the remaining four types of the nasal septal deformities, have been explained and described in detail, giving the court expert witnesses the excellent opportunity to make a reliable and valuable finding.

CONCLUSION. Type 5 and type 6 nasal septal deformities are never the consequence of the trauma against the nose. In most of the cases, this also concerns type 3. This type as well as type 7 require the latero-lateral and anterior-posterior X-rays of the nasal bones in cases when the nasal pyramid is concurrently deformed. Types 1 and 2 in most of the cases are connected to trauma against the nose.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Mladina R. The role of maxillar morphology in the development of pathological septal deformities. Rhinology. 1987;25(3):199-205.

  • 2. Verwoerd CD Mladina R Nolst Trenite GJ Pigott RW. The nose in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;32 Suppl:S45-52.

  • 3. Mladina R Ostojić D Koželj V Heinzel B Bastaić LJ. Pathological septal deformities in cleft palate children. L’Otorinolaryngologia Pediatrica. 1997;2-3:75-80.

  • 4. Mladina R Šubarić M. Are some septal deformities inherited? Type 6 revisited. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67:1291-94.

  • 5. Mladina R Skitarelić N Vuković K Subarić M Carić T Orihovac Z. Unilateral cleft lip/palate children: the incidence of type 6 septal deformities in their parents. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(6):335-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 2.

  • 6. Enlow DH. Growth and remodeling of the human maxilla. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:446–64.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 257 81 5
PDF Downloads 117 42 3