BACKGROUND. Septal deviations are usually diagnosed by a patient’s subjective complaint of nasal stuffiness and a physical examination by the otorhinolaringologist. The decision for surgery is not always based on objective measurements. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry are objective tools for assessment of nasal patency but is still a controversial subject. In our populations, there are no general accepted methods for screening patients for septal surgery.
OBJECTIVE. To analyse the effectiveness of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in predicting the outcomes of septoplasty and rhinoseptoplasty and their usefulness in preoperative screening of septal deviations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS. 69 patients were included in this prospective study. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry were performed before and one year after surgery for the investigation of nasal obstruction. Several parameters were analysed before and after decongestion of the nasal mucosa. VAS (visual analogue scale) was also included for evaluation of the subjective symptom score pre- and postoperatively. After surgery, a short questionnaire was applied to investigate patients’ postoperative satisfaction.
RESULTS. The mean subjective scores of nasal patency improved significantly after surgery with 77%. Several parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry were analysed with binary logistic regression, to evaluate the predictive values on the postoperative satisfaction. The preoperative decongested overall MCA (minimal cross-sectional area) on the deviation side, the decongested bilateral MCA and the decongested Flow ratio had significantly the highest impact on the postoperative satisfaction (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry as objective tools can serve as objective evidence for the efficacy of septoplasty and rhinoseptoplasty. The parameters of rhinomanometry and anterior rhinometry are useful in the preoperative screening for septal deviations and in predicting postoperative satisfaction between different degrees of nasal septal deviations.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Stewart M.G. Smith T.L. Weaver E.M. et al. - Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(3):283–290.
2. Gray L.P. - Deviated nasal septum. Incidence and etiology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1978;87(3 Pt 3Suppl 50):3-20.
3. Aziz T. Biron L.V. Ansari K. Flores-Mir C. - Measurement tools for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;43:1-11. doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-43-11.
4. Toyserkani N.M. Frisch T. von Buchwald C. - Postoperative improvement in acoustic rhinometry measurements after septoplasty correlates with long-term satisfaction. Rhinology 2013;51(2):171-175. doi: 10.4193/Rhino12.163.
5. Dinis P.B. Haider H. - Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;23(2):85-90.
6. Skoloudik L. Vokurka J. Zborayova K. Celakovsky P. Kucera M. Ryska A. - Cytology of the nasal mucosa after total laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(11):1262-1265. doi: 10.3109/00016480802654398.
7. Holmström M. - The use of objective measures in selecting patients for septal surgery. Rhinology 2010;48(4):387-393. doi: 10.4193/Rhino10.072.
8. Tombu S. Daele J. Lefebvre P. - Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry in rhinoplasty. B-ENT 2010;6(Suppl 15):3-11.
9. Andre R.F. Vuyk H.D. Ahmed A. Graamans K. Nolst Trenite G.J. - Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34(6):518-525. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02042.x.
10. Kahveci O.K. Miman M.C. Yucel A. Yucedag F. Okur E. Altuntas A. - The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012;39(3):275-279. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
11. Larsson C. Millqvist E. Bende M. - Relationship between subjective nasal stuffiness and nasal patency measured by acoustic rhinometry. Am J Rhinol. 2001;15(6):403-405.
12. Vicheva D. - Measurement of the nose with acoustic rhinometry. Medical review 2004;Vol.XL(3):69-73.
13. Frank-Ito D.O. Kimbell J.S. Laud P. Garcia G.J. Rhee J.S. - Predicting post-surgery nasal physiology with computational modeling: current challenges and limitations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(5):751–759. doi: 10.1177/0194599814547497. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
14. Vicheva D. - Investigation in subjects without nasal symptoms. Turkish Journal of Rhinology 2008;1(1):5-7.
15. Mckiernan D.C. Banfield G. Kumar R. Hinton A.E. - Patient benefit from functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol. 2001;26(1):50-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2001.00427.x.
16. Lam D.J. James K.T. Weaver E.M. - Comparison of anatomic physiological and subjective measures of the nasal airway. Am J Rhinol. 2006;20(5):463–470.
17. Rhee J.S. Poetker D.M. Smith T.L. Bustillo A. Burzynski M. Davis R.E. - Nasal valve surgery improves disease-specific quality of life. Laryngoscope 2005;115(3):437–440.
18. Vicheva D. - Acoustic rhinometry. Monography. Publishing House “BOYKING” Plovdiv 2003.
19. Mlynski G. - Surgery of the nasal septum. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(4):223-229.
20. Zoumalan R.A. Constantinides M. - Subjective and objective improvement in breathing after rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14(6):423-428. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2012.665.
21. Pirila T. Tikanto J. - Unilateral and bilateral effects of nasal septum surgery demonstrated with acoustic rhinometry rhinomanometry and subjective assessment. Am J Rhinol. 2001;15(2):127–133.
22. Grymer L.F. Hilberg O. Elbrond O. Pedersen O.F. - Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of the nasal cavity with septal deviations before and after septoplasty. Laryngoscope 1989;99(11):1180-1187.
23. Szucs E. Clement P.A. - Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in the evaluation of nasal patency of patients with nasal septal deviation. Am J Rhinol. 1989;12(5):345-352.
24. Broms P. - Rhinomanometry. III. Procedures and criteria for distinction between skeletal stenosis and mucosal swelling. Acta Otolaryngol. 1982;94(3-4):361-370.
25. Jessen M. Malm L. - The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty. Rhinology 1984;22(3):157-164.
26. Jessen M. Ivarsson A. Malm L. - Nasal airway resistance and symptoms after functional septoplasty: comparison of findings at 9 months and 9 years. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1989;14(3):231-234.
27. Sipilä J.I. Suonpää J.T. Kortekangas A.E. Laippala P.T. - Rhinomanometry before Septoplasty: An Approach to Clinical Material with Diverse Nasal Symptoms. Am J Rhinol. 1992;6(1):17-22.
28. Sipila J. Suonpaa J. - A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254(8):387-390.
29. Kemker B. Liu X. Gungor A. Moinuddin R. Corey J.P. - Effect of nasal surgery on the nasal cavity as determined by acoustic rhinometry. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121(5):567–571.
30. Lio H.J. - Outcome after nasal septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2010;52:205–221.
31. Pirila T. Tikanto J. - Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in the preoperative screening of septal surgery patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009;23:605-609.
32. Boyce J.M. Eccles R. - Assessement of subjective scales for selection of patients for nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31:297-302.