The Regressive Magic of Words in Psychoanalytic Treatment


The clinical vignettes evoked in this text open up, I hope, new lines of thinking and reflection, necessary in approaching the following fundamental issue: what does the archaic aspect of the analytic relationship consist of, considered a determining element for the changes and transformations induced by the psychoanalytical protocol? An indispensable question for the deepening of means of evolution for the psychoanalytical technique, directly determined by the diversity of personality structures and defence mechanisms which the method has been confronted with the past years. All the more so that what can be brought to light from the past never represents a faithful witness of the prehistoric age, but rather a heterogeneous product to the extent that every stage of life traversed by the human subject modifies in its turn « primitive » experiences. This is also the reason for which states of pathogenic regression do not allow an exact reconstitution of original situations. Especially since there is not much said about origin. Only the paradox can be noticed, that the origin is different from the archaic. An archaic that continues to produce meaning in the present, forcing psychoanalytical practice and its practitioners to adapt to modernity, thorough the strangest and most unexpected clinical forms thus convoked.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ABRAHAM, K. (1907-1925). Oeuvres complètes. [Complete works] Payot, Paris, 1966, p. 362.

  • ADOMNICAI, I. (2004). Corps malade et adolescence. [Sick body and adolescence]. In Press, Paris, p. 266.

  • AISENSTEIN, M. (2002). La tombe des lucioles. [Grave of the fireflies] In Rev Franc Psychosom 22: 39-44.

  • FAIN, M. (1971). Prélude à la vie fantasmatique. [Prelude to fantasmatic life]. In Rev Fr Psychanal 35: 291-364.

  • FEDIDA, P. (1995). Le site de l’étranger. [The site of the alien] PUF, Paris, p. 311.

  • FREUD, S. (1914). Pour introduire le narcissisme. [On Narcissism: An Introduction] In La vie sexuelle. PUF, Paris, 1969, p. 14.

  • FREUD, S. (1923). Le Moi et le Ca. [The Ego and the Id] In Essais de psychanalyse. Payot, Paris, 1981, pp. 219-262.

  • FREUD, S. (1937). Constructions dans l’analyse. [Constructions in Analysis] In Resultats, idées, problèmes, II. PUF, Paris, 1985.

  • GREEN, A. (1973). Le discours vivant. [The Living discourse] PUF, Paris, p. 364.

  • GREEN, A. (2002). La pensée clinique. [The clinical thought] Odile Jacob, Paris, p. 358.

  • MARTY, P. (1980). L’ordre psychosomatique. [The psychosomatic order] Payot, Paris, p. 299.

  • MCDOUGALL, J. (1989). Théâtres du corps. [Theatres of the body] Gallimard, Paris, p. 220.

  • SMADJA, C. (1993). A propos des procédés autocalmants du Moi. [On the self-calming processes of the Self] Rev Franc Psychosom 4: 9-25. PUF, Paris.

  • SZWEC, G. (1993). « Les procédés autocalmants par la recherche répétitive de l’excitation. Les galériens volontaire ». [The self-calming processes for the repetitive research of excitation,] Rev Franc Psychosom 4: 51. PUF, Paris, p. 51.


Journal + Issues