Modern medicine has increasingly directed its interest towards discovering the etiology of occupational dermatitis, but unfortunately it is not completely elucidated. As with other occupational diseases, the presence of the exposure and the temporal relation between the exposure and the appearance of the characteristic signs is a defining element, but obtaining the information on the etiological factors is not always easy, therefore the attention must be directed to a systematic collection of these data. Clinical diagnosis is not sufficient, so additional paraclinical tests are needed for a complete diagnosis. Currently, more and more emphasis is being placed on experimental studies targeting the discovery of molecular or genetic markers that complement the idea of individual susceptibility in the appearance of contact dermatitis. As frequent as it is difficult to diagnose, occupational dermatitis is still a public health problem.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Ortiz de Frutos FJ Conde Salazar L. Eczemas y dermatosis profesionales. In L Conde Salazar ed. Tratado de Dermatología. LUZÁN 5: Madrid 1994: 351–401.
2. Bucur G Bucur L Minca D Otelea M. – Dermatoze alergice profesionale (D.A.P.) în Patologia alergica professional (sub redactia Naghi E.) Ed. Moldogrup Bucuresti. 2001:12-98.
3. John SM Kezic S. Occupational skin diseases–Development and Implementation of European Standards on Prevention of Occupational Skin Diseases. JEADV. 2017;31(Suppl.4):3-4.
4. Calugareanu DL Popescu FS. Morbiditatea profesionala in Romania. Anul 2017 - Registrul Operativ Naţional al Bolilor Profesionale 2018 Institutul Naţional De Sănătate Publică Bucureşti. Downloaded on 7 june 2019. https://cnmrmc.insp.gov.ro/images/rapoarte/BoliProfesionale2017.pdf
5. Taylor JS Sood A Amado A. Occupational Skin Diseases Due to Irritants and Allergens in Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine 7th Edition. 2008:2068.
6. Lachapelle JM Frimat P Tennstedt D Ducombs G. Dermatologie Professionnelle et de l’Environnement. Ed. Masson Paris 1992;67:63-111.
8. Novak-Bilić G Vučić M Japundžić I Meštrović-Štefekov J Stanić-Duktaj S Lugović-Mihić L. Irritant and allergic contact dermatitis–skin lesion characteristics. Acta Clin Croat. 2018;57(4):713–20.
9. Ale IS Maibach HI. Irritant contact dermatitis. Rev Environ Health. 2014;29(3):195-206.
10. Lurati AR. Occupational risk assessment and irritant contact dermatitis. Workplace health & safety. 2015 Feb;63(2):81-7.
11. Al-Otaibi ST Alqahtani HAM. Management of contact dermatitis. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg.2015;19(2):86-91.
12. English J. Current concepts of irritant contact dermatitis. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(8):722–6.
13. Watkins SA Maibach HI. The hardening phenomenon in irritant contact dermatitis: an interpretative update. Contact Dermatitis Environmental and Occupational Dermatitis. 2009;60(3):123-130.
14. Park SI Kim JH Cho SI et al. Induction of a Hardening Phenomenon and Quantitative Changes of Ceramides in Stratum Corneum. Ann Dermatol. 2014 26(1):35–42.
15. Susitaival P Flyvholm M Meding B et al. Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49:70-6.
16. Chiriac AE Azoicai D Chiriac A Naznean A Larese Filon F Georgescu SR Foia L Podoleanu C Stolnicu S. Romanian Questionnaire to Assess the Prevalence of Occupational Hand Eczema among Healthcare Providers. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine 2016; Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1515/jim-2016-0061
17. Steiner M Dick F Semple S et al. How valid is a skin health questionnaire for occupational skin surveillance? Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2011;68(Suppl_1):A45-A45.