Objective. This study aimed to provide the true picture of a ten-year absenteeism survey with regard to work-related illnesses and injuries in medical-social workers, and to develop an analytical model for the occupational health practitioner to facilitate record linkage between health outcomes and occupational data.
Methods. Severity indicator and specific weight indicator were calculated on the basis of sick leaves evidence from seven care facilities, as well as the average lost days per year within the period 2008-2017. Four types of work-related illnesses, non-reported accidents and five occupational groups accounted for statistic modeling of data.
Results. According to the specific weight indicator for occupations, nurses ranked the first place for musculoskeletal disorders, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and traumatic injuries, followed by medical-social-educational staff. Severity indicator for musculoskeletal disorders was high correlated with the number of employees (r=0.66).
Conclusions: This analytical method is reliable to be applied in risk assessment procedures and occupational health expertise.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1.Parlamentul României. Legea asistenţei sociale nr. 292 din 2011 M.O. nr. 905 din 20 decembrie 2011.
2.FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Summary overview of types and characteristics of institutional and community-based services for persons with disabilities available across the EU. Vienna Austria. November 2017.
3.OSHA. Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Health Care and Social Services Workers. OSHA Publication 3148 – 06R. 2016.
4.European Commission. Occupational health and safety risks in the healthcare sector: Guide to prevention and good practice. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. 2011.
5.WHO. Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. Available at: http://www.who.int/occupational_health/publications/muscdisorders/en.
6.European Parliament and Council of 16 December 2008. Regulation (EC) no 1338/2008 on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:354:0070:0081:EN:PDF.
7.Pece S Dascalescu A. Method of assessing risk of accident and occupational illness in workplaces. Ministry of Labour and Social Security - National Institute of Research and Development for Work Protection Bucharest Romania. 1998. Available at: http://www.protectiamuncii.ro/en/good_practice/evaluarea_riscurilor_locurile%20_munca.shtml/.
8.Stoia M. Practica medicinii muncii. Ediţia a 2-a revizuită. Editura Universităţii „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu: Sibiu.2010;162-5.
9.Direcția de Sănătate Publică Sibiu. Dare de seamă privind ITM în anul 2017. 2018.
10.Minimol K. Risk Assessment and Strengths Based Case Management in Elderly Care - Scope of Social Work Practice. ArthaJ SocSci 2016;15:121-33.
11.Punnett L. Musculoskeletal disorders and occupational exposures: how should we judge the evidence concerning the causal association? Scand J Public Health 2014;42(13 Suppl):49-58.
12.Punnett L Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004;14:13-23.
13.Călugăreanu LD Popescu FS. Raport 2017 al Sintezei naţionale: Monitorizarea incidenţei bolilor profesionale şi a absenteismului medical prin boală profesională Institutul Naţional de Sănătate Publică Bucureşti. 2018.
14.Świątkowska B Hanke W. Occupational diseases among healthcare and social workers in 2009–2016. Med Pr 2018;69:531-8.
15.Goetzel RZ Roemer EC Holingue C. et al. Mental Health in the Workplace: A Call to Action. Proceedings from the Mental Health in the Workplace: Public Health Summit. J Occup Environ Med 2018;60:322-30.
16.Baciu L Vîrgă D. Well-being and Turnover Intentions among Romanian Social Workers. Revista de Asistenţă Socială 2018;1:89 107.