Cancer induced by exposure to ionizing radiations in medical personnel

Open access


Ionizing radiation are classified as Class I carcinogens. The exposure to this factor increases the risk of developing cancer, and researchers aim to establish the relationship between the exposure and the risk levels, as well as guidelines which would limit exposure to it. The risks were assessed through studies related to the atomic bomb survivors, to the populations exposed to radiation for the purpose of diagnosis or therapy and to the professionally exposed populations – radiologists, radiotherapists, workers in uranium mines, operatives in the nuclear industry. The population of Japanese survivors of the atomic bombs is the largest population exposed and studied with an extremely wide age range (from the irradiation in utero to old people). This population, made up of 93.000 people, represents a major source of information used to determine the potential risk of low dose radiation exposure. Health professionals working with ionizing radiation have been studied ever since the 1890’s. After the implementation of a radiation protection system, the doses received decreased only to increase again with the technical development and its use in a wide variety of specialties. Two recent studies on large cohorts and during long periods of time brought information about the cancer risk due to occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and shed light on the need to monitor exposed staff and re-evaluate radiological safety standards. This review is focused on recent literature concerning the radiation exposure of medical professionals.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1.Hendee WR O’Connor MK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology 2012;264:312-21.

  • 2.Miller RW. Delayed effects of external radiation exposure: a brief history. Radiation Research 1995;144:160-9.

  • 3.UNSCEAR sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York United Nations Studies of radiation-exposed population 2000.

  • 4.United Nations. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes (vol.2). United Nations publications; 2008 p. 344.

  • 5.NRC (National Research Council : Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation BEIR VII Washington DC National Academy Press 2006.

  • 6.Rajaraman P Doody MM Yu CL. Cancer Risks in US Radiologic Technologists Working With Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures 1994-2008. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:1101-9.

  • 7.Sun Z Inskip PD Wang J. Solid cancer incidence among Chinese medical diagnostic x-ray workers 1950–1995: Estimation of radiation-related risks. International Journal of Cancer 2016;138:2875-83.

  • 8.Venneri L Rossi F Botto N. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council’s Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. Am Heart J 2009; 157:118-24.

  • 9.Al-Abdulsalam A Brindhaban A. Occupational radiation exposure among the staff of Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2014;23:129-33.

  • 10.Joeris A Goldhahn S Kalampoki V. Intraoperative Radiation Exposure of Orthopaedic Surgeons – Mismatch. Occup Med Health Aff 2018;6:2.

  • 11.Valone LC Chambers M Lattanza L. Breast Radiation Exposure in Female Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:1808-13.

  • 12.Kirkwood ML Guild JB Arbique GM. Surgeon radiation dose during complex endovascular procedures. Journal of vascular surgery 2015;62:457-63.

  • 13.Kendrick DE Miller CP Moorehead PA. Comparative occupational radiation exposure between fixed and mobile imaging systems. J Vasc Surg 2016;63:190-7.

  • 14.Attigah N Oikonomou K Hinz U. Radiation exposure to eye lens and operator hands during endovascular procedures in hybrid operating rooms. J Vasc Surg 2016;63:198-203.

  • 15.Zeegers D Venkatesan S Koh SW. Biomarkers of Ionizing Radiation Exposure: A Multiparametric Approach. Genome Integr 2017;8:6.

  • 16.Rapport de l’ASN sur l’état de la sûreté nucléaire et de la radioprotection en France en 2017. Available: [Accessed 22 10 2018].

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 127 127 7
PDF Downloads 101 101 4